1
62
RASKIL’DINA et al.
5. A. F. Plate and T. A. Meerovich, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR,
The reactions proceed to a high conversion of norꢀ
No. 2, 219 (1947).
bornene and quite selectively (Table 3).
The reaction of norbornene with ethylene glycol as
an example in the presence of HꢀBeta zeolite showed
that the yield of the diether increases with the increasꢀ
ing temperature. Thus, the amount of diether 23 in the
products of the reaction at 50
whereas it is formed in an amount comparable to that
of monoether 22 at 80 . The total selectivity for
6. H. C. Brown and M.ꢀH. Reie, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 24,
5646 (1969).
7. S. A. Shackelford, J. Org. Chem. 44, 3485 (1979).
8. D. F. Shellhamer, C. M. Curtis, R. H. Dunham, et al.,
°
С
is about 5% (Table 3),
J. Org. Chem. 50, 2751 (1985).
9. D. F. Shellhamer, R. D. Chapman, S. A. Shackelford,
et al., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, No. 2, 787 (1997).
°
С
ethers 23 and 25 decreases with the increasing temperꢀ
ature, since the amount of the byproducts nortricyꢀ
clane (NTC) and norbornene dimers grows.
1
0. M. J.ꢀL. Tschan, C. M. Thomas, H. Strub, and J.ꢀF. Carꢀ
pentier, Adv. Synth. Catal. 351, 2496 (2009).
11. A. G. Gasanov and A. V. Nagiev, Zh. Org. Khim. 30
,
Variation of the norbornene : diol molar ratio from
707 (1994).
1
: 3 to 3 : 1 in the reaction of norbornene with 2ꢀ 12. D. C. Rosenfeld, S. Shekhar, A. Takemiya, et al., Org.
buteneꢀ1,4ꢀdiol results in an increase in the proporꢀ
tion of diether 25 in the products (Table 3).
Lett. 8, 4179 (2006).
13. R. T. Mathers, C. LeBlond, K. Damodaran, et al.,
In summary, the data obtained in the study show a
Macromolecules 41, 524 (2008).
high efficiency of the HꢀBeta zeolite catalyst in reacꢀ 14. J. G. Taylor, N. Whittall, and K. K. (Mimi) Hii, Chem.
tions of the direct hydroalkoxylation of norbornene.
Commun., Issue 40, 5103 (2005).
In the reaction of norbornene with monohydric 15. M. J.ꢀL. Tschan, C. M. Thomas, H. Strub, and
alcohols, HꢀBeta zeolite does not rank below homoꢀ
J.ꢀF. Carpentier, Adv. Synth. Catal. 351, 2496 (2009).
geneous catalytic systems based on trifluoromethaneꢀ 16. Т. Hirai, А. Hamasaki, А. Nakamura, and
sulfonic acid in activity and selectivity and is even М. Tokunaga, Org. Lett. 11, 5510 (2009).
superior to them in the case of saturated aliphatic 17. Y. Oe, T. Ohta, and Y. Ito, Synlett, No. 1, 179 (2005).
alcohols. The conversion of norbornene in the reacꢀ
tion with saturated and unsaturated aliphatic and aroꢀ
matic monohydric alcohols is 78–98%, and the selecꢀ
tivity for alkoxynorbornanes reaches 98%.
The products of the norbornene reactions with
diols in the presence of HꢀBeta zeolite are monoꢀ and
diethers, whose yield and ratio can be controlled by
varying the reaction parameters.
1
1
2
2
8. T. T. Dang, F. Boeck, and L. Hintermann, J. Org.
Chem. 76, 9353 (2011).
9. K. Hensen, C. Mahaim, and W. F. Hölderich, Stud.
Surf. Sci. Catal. 105, 1133 (1997).
0. S. Radhakrishnan, J. Franken, and J. A. Martens,
Green Chem. 14, 1475 (2012).
1. G. Z. Raskil’dina, A. M. Suleimanova, A. N. Kazakꢀ
ova, et al., Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Khim. Khim.
Tekhnol. 56 (10), 29 (2013).
2
2. G. Z. Raskil’dina, Yu. G. Borisova, E. A. Mustafina,
and N. G. Grigor’eva, in LowꢀWaste, ResourceꢀSaving
Chemical Technologies and Environmental Safety: Proꢀ
ceedings of AllꢀRussia Scientific–Practical Conference
with International Participation (Fobos, Sterlitamak,
2013), p. 29 [in Russian].
REFERENCES
1
2
3
4
. R. McCague, M. G. Rowlands, S. E. Barrie, and
J. Houghton, J. Med. Chem. 33, 3050 (1990).
. J. M. Hanifin, S. C. Chan, J. B. Cheng, et al., J. Invest.
Dermatol. 107, 51 (1996).
. M. K. Mamedov, I. N. Gadzhieva, and Kh. M. Alimaꢀ 23. J. K. Whitesell and M. A. Minton, Stereochemical Analꢀ
rdanov, Russ. J. Org. Chem. 39, 180 (2003).
. M. K. Mamedov and E. T. Suleimanova, Zh. Org.
Khim. 29, 1138 (1993).
ysis of Alicyclic Compounds by Cꢀ13 NMR Spectroscopy
Chapman and Hall, London, 1988).
Translated by S. Zatonsky
(
PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY Vol. 55
No. 2
2015