5.3 ( 0.3 and a Ka yields of 50 500 ( 700 M-1. Similar
titrations performed between L1 and other divalent ions of
Mg, Ca, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn, and Cd exhibited no significant
change in the emission intensities (Figure 1a). At lower and
higher pH, viz., 6.0 and 8.0, the fluorescence is further
quenched. A change in the anion, viz., Cu(NO3)2 and CuCl2,
indicated no influence of the counteranion on the fluores-
cence results. Binding of Cu2+ with L1 in HEPES buffer was
further confirmed by absorption spectral studies (Figure 1b)
that provide a Ka of 42 500 ( 1000 M-1. However, Zn2+
does not show any significant binding in buffer (Figure 1c)
(Supporting Information, S4).
Titration of a mixture of {L1 and Cu2+} with M2+ (Figure
1d) in HEPES buffer resulted in a decrease of fluorescence
intensity by ∼10% in the case of Mg2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, and
Zn2+, by ∼30% in the case of Fe2+, Co2+, and Ni2+, and by
∼45% in the case of Cd2+, indicating that there is a net
fluorescence increase of L1 by 290-470% when Cu2+ is
bound in the presence of other biologically relevant metal
ions reported here. This can also be gauged by the fluores-
cence decay constants obtained during the titrations of {L1
and Cu2+} with M2+, viz., 37 100, 38 000, 40 000, 23 100,
and 29 400 M-1, respectively, for Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+,
and Cd2+. Fluorescence studies performed in HEPES buffer
by varying the concentration of Cu2+ but keeping the [Cu2+]/
[L1] mole ratio at 1:2 clearly indicated that the detection of
580 ppb can be established with an increase in fluorescence
by at least 150% (Supporting Information, S4). Thus, Cu2+
can be selectively recognized and quantified in HEPES buffer
at a physiological pH using L1 to quite low concentrations
even in the presence of other biologically relevant metal ions,
Scheme 1
Titration of L1 with Cu2+ in MeOH resulted in a substantial
increase in the fluorescence intensity of a 354 nm band until
the [Cu2+]/[L1] mole ratio is 0.5 (I/I0 ratio is 18 ( 1) and
then a decrease thereafter. Similar titration with Zn2+ in
MeOH shows a gradual increase in the fluorescence intensity
of a 450 nm band until the [Zn2+]/[L1] mole ratio of 1.0
(I/I0 ratio of 18 ( 2) and saturation thereafter. The titration
of L1 in MeOH with other biologically relevant divalent ions
of Mg, Ca, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cd exhibited no significant
change in the fluorescence intensity of either the 350 or the
450 nm bands. On the basis of the Benesi-Hildebrand
equation, Ka’s of 50 000 ( 1000 and 50 500 ( 1000 M-1
were derived, respectively, for Zn2+ and Cu2+ (Supporting
Information, S2).
The binding of Cu2+ and Zn2+ to L1 in MeOH was further
ascertained from the absorption spectral changes noticed in
the titrations. A plot of absorbance vs the [M2+]/[L1] mole
ratio for various bands clearly indicated the formation of a
1:1 complex in the case of Zn2+ and a 1:2 complex in the
case of Cu2+, the same as that obtained from the fluorescence
studies, and the corresponding logarithmic plots yielded Ka’s
of 44 500 ( 1500 and 50 500 ( 3500 M-1 in the cases of
Cu2+ and Zn2+, respectively. Similar titrations performed in
MeOH with other metal ions did not show any interpretable
changes in the spectra (Supporting Information, S3).
However, the fluorescence titrations performed between
M2+ and L1 in HEPES buffer, at pH 7.2-7.4, yielded
altogether different results. In buffer, only the titration of
Cu2+ with L1 showed a gradual enhancement in the fluo-
rescence intensity of the 350 nm band until the [Cu2+]/[L1]
mole ratio was 0.5 and a decrease thereafter with I/I0 being
by eliciting a switch-on fluorescence behavior (ΦL1
0.0005, ΦL1ꢀL1 ) 4.7 M-1 cm-1; and ΦL1+Cu ) 0.0035,
L1+CuꢀL1+Cu ) 34.4 M-1 cm-1) with a 7.0-fold increase in
)
Φ
quantum yield and a ∼7.3-fold increase in brightness
(ΦL1ꢀL1) upon Cu2+ addition.
These studies were appropriately compared with those of
the synthetic control molecular systems, L2, L3, and L4
(Figure 2, Supporting Information, S1) to establish the role
of imine and carbohydrate units in the sensor property of
L1.
(2) (a) Zeng, Li; Miller, E. W.; Pralle, A.; Isacoff, E. Y.; Chang, C. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10. (b) Banthia, S.; Samanta, A. New J. Chem.
2005, 29, 1007. (c) Singh, A.; Yao, Q.; Tong, L.; Clark Still, W.; Sames,
D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9601. (d) Cano-Raya, C.; Fern’andez-Ramos,
M. D.; Capit’an-Vallvey L. F. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 555, 299. (e) Brunner,
J.; Kraemer, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13626. (f) Royzen, M.; Dai,
Z.; Canary, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1612. (g) Torrado, A.;
Walkup, G. K.; Imperiali, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 609. (h) Xu,
Z.; Qian, X.; Cui, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3029. (i) Xu, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Qian,
X.; Cui, J.; Cui, D. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 889. (j) Gunnlaugsson, T.; Leonard,
J. P.; Murray, N. S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1557.
(3) (a) Woodroofe, C. C.; Lippard, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
11458. (b) Shults, M. D.; Pearce, D. A.; Imperiali, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 10591. (c) Taki, M.; Wolford, J. L.; O’Halloran, T. V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 712. (d) Walkup, G. K.; Imperiali, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 3053. (e) Nolan, E. M.; Burdette, S. C.; Harvey, J. H.;
Hilderbrand, S. A.; Lippard, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 2624. (f) Chang,
C. J.; Nolan, E. M.; Jaworski, J.; Burdette, S. C.; Sheng, M.; Lippard, S. J.
Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 203. (g) Chang, C. J.; Jaworski, J.; Nolan, E. M.;
Sheng, M.; Lippard, S. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 1129.
(h) Chang, C. J.; Nolan, E. M.; Jaworski, J.; Okamoto, K.; Hayashi, Y.;
Sheng, M.; Lippard, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 6774. (i) Royzen, M.;
Durandin, A.; Young, V. G., Jr.; Geacintov, N. E.; Canary, J. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3854. (j) Ajayaghosh, A.; Carol, P.; Sreejith, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14962.
Titration of Cu2+ with L2 in HEPES buffer showed no
significant change in the fluorescence intensity, suggesting
that the -HCdN- moiety in L1 favors Cu2+ binding over
that in L2 owing to the formation of a chelate in the case of
L1. The effect of such a chelation on the recognition of one
metal ion over the other has been recently demonstrated in
the case of calix[4]arene derivatives.4 However, the titration
with Cu2+ resulted in an increase of I/I0 to only 2.7 in the
case of L3 and to 2.3 in the case of L4 (Figure 3a). These
data suggest that the marginal increase observed in I/I0 in
the case of L3 and L4 can be explained on the basis of the
presence of imine and naphthylic -OH moieties suitable for
forming six-membered chelate and precludes the involvement
of the carbohydrate moiety in L4 in binding at least at the
(4) (a) Dessingou, J.; Joseph, R.; Rao, C. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46,
7967. (b) Kumar, A.; Ali, A.; Rao, C. P. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A Chem.
2006, 117, 164.
3526
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 16, 2006