ChemComm
Communication
In addition, the cellular uptake of JLP1 differs from that of
JLP2. JLP1 and JLP2 (10 mM) were tested in latent EBV-infected
nasopharyngeal carcinoma C666-1 cells for 12 hours. The
uptake of JLP2 could be observed more apparently: the confocal
images from the C666-1 cells in the presence of JLP1 and JLP2
have been related to the findings from the flow cytometry
uptake studies (Fig. 3). No emission can be obtained from
JLP1 in the C666-1 cells and only JLP2 displays impressive
emission in the latent EBV-infected nasopharyngeal carcinoma
C666-1 cells in the same experiment.
In the cytotoxicity experiment (JLP1 and JLP2 in EBV/
non-EBV infected tumor cells, and Eik1 as the control), JLP2
demonstrated smaller IC50 values in EBV infected cancer cells
(C666-1, BIC50 = 20 mM, similar to the Eik1) than in non-EBV
infected cancer cells (HeLa, BIC50 = 1 mM). On the other hand,
JLP1, P1 and P2 demonstrated similar IC50 values with HeLa and
C666-1 cells under the same experimental conditions. Peptides
P1 and P2 are not cell permeable and alone are not effective in
preventing the growth of carcinoma cells, and so served as the
control experiments in the MTT assays (Fig. 4).
A specific and selective agent for both the imaging and
targeting of this virus-associated tumor is not currently avail-
able in the literature. In this regard, we have synthesised a dual-
function fluorescent probe (JLP2) of verified applicability for the
simultaneous imaging and control of the growth of a tumor
latently infected with EBV (e.g. nasopharyngeal carcinoma), on
account of the probe’s underlying mechanism of specifically
preventing the dimerization of EBNA1.
This work was funded by grants from The Hong Kong
Research Grants Council (HKBU 203013), City University of Hong
Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University (FRG 2/12-13/069).
Fig. 4 The inhibitory activities, measured by cell viability, of two EBNA1
specific peptides (P1 and P2), two small molecules (JLP1 and JLP2) and Eik1
(control) on (a) non-latent EBV-infected human cervical carcinoma HeLa
cells and (b) latent EBV-infected nasopharyngeal carcinoma C666-1 cells.
Notes and references
1 H. K. Koon, P. S. Chan, R. N. S. Wong, Z. G. Wu, M. L. Lung,
C. K. Chang and N. K. Mak, J. Cell. Biochem., 2009, 108, 1356.
2 L. S. Young and A. B. Rickinson, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 2004, 4, 757;
K. C. Chan, C. M. Ting, P. S. Chan, M. C. Lo, K. W. Lo, J. E Curry,
T. Smyth, A. W. M. Lee, W. T. Ng, G. S. W. Tsao, R. N. S. Wong,
M. L. Lung and N. K. Mak, Mol. Cancer, 2013, 12, 128.
photophysical properties of JLP1 and JLP2 are similar, as only
one amino acid in their structures is different; however, the
in situ and in vitro behaviours of JLP1 and JLP2 are completely
distinct. For instance, after the addition of EBNA1 into the
aqueous solutions of JLP1 and JLP2, emission enhancement
could be detected only for JLP2, more or less 1.5-fold upon the
addition of 200 nM EBNA1 (inset of Fig. 2), whereas, for JLP1, the
emission intensity was slightly diminished with the same dose of
EBNA1 in water (Fig. S14, ESI†). Aside from this, we had also
confirmed the specific binding of JLP2 to EBNA1 by MBS
(3-maleimidobenzoyl N-hydroxysuccinimide) crossed-linked SDS-
PAGE assay. MBS can form covalent cross-linkages with dimerized
3 G. Kennedy and B. Sugden, Mol. Cell. Biol., 2003, 23, 6906.
´
4 A. T. C. Chan, V. Gregoire, J.-L. Lefebvre, L. Licitra and E. Felip, Ann.
Oncol., 2010, 21, 187.
5 L. Frappier, Scientifica, 2012, 2012, 438204.
6 D. W. Smith and B. Sugden, Viruses, 2013, 5, 226.
7 S. J. Duellman, K. L. Thompson, J. J. Coon and R. R. Burgess,
J. Gen. Virol., 2009, 90, 2251.
8 N. Li, S. Thompson, D. C. Schultz, W. Zhu, H. Jiang, C. Luo and
P. M. Lieberman, PLoS One, 2010, 5, e10126.
9 S. Y. Kim, K. A. Song, E. Kieff and M. S. Kang, Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun., 2012, 424, 251.
EBNA1 proteins, which can be separated using SDS-PAGE. That is, 10 M. Kenji, Y.-S. Naoko, O. Chikashi, T. Toshiki and M. Hisao,
J. Biol. Chem., 2012, 287(28), 23977.
11 G. R. Rosania, J. W. Lee, L. Ding, H.-S. Yoon and Y.-T. Chang,
EBNA1, disrupted by the compound in the assay, can no longer
exist as a dimer. In Fig. S16 (ESI†) (black box), it can be seen that
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 1130.
only JLP2 obviously decreased the amount of dimeric EBNA1.
12 O. Trott and A. J. Olson, J. Comput. Chem., 2010, 31, 455.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 6517--6519 | 6519