132
Y. Önal et al. / Journal of Catalysis 223 (2004) 122–133
already decreased to a small value, and the catalyst surface
should not be covered completely with D-glucose. Thus, the
adsorption of D-glucose is the rate-determining step of the
reaction and a modeling that represents this transition area
correctly should provide a reliable value for KG.
The concentration profiles of D-glucose hardly change,
when the value of KGS is varied. That means that the des-
orption of D-gluconic acid is always very fast compared with
the rates of the other elementary steps, so that the overall re-
action rate is never affected by this step.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. C. Mohr for the TEM analysis
of the catalysts at the Max-Planck-Institute for Microstruc-
ture Physics Halle, and Dr. J. Radnik (Institute for Applied
Chemistry Berlin) for the XPS measurements.
Appendix A. Nomenclature
[G] /[GS] D-Glucose/D-gluconic acid concentration;
[G]LS/[GS]SL D-Glucose/D-gluconic acid concentration on
the catalyst surface;
To check the optimization routine, initial values for the
kinetic parameters were varied widely and their influence on
the calculated parameters was analyzed. The resulting con-
centration courses were all in good agreement with the ex-
perimental data. It is notable that the adsorption constant of
D-gluconic acid was always smaller than that of D-glucose.
Furthermore, the values calculated for k1 were always simi-
lar independent of the model applied.
kads,G/kdes,G Adsorption/desorption constant of D-glucose;
k1/k
Reaction rate constants of the surface reaction;
−1
kdes,GS/kads,GS Desorption/adsorption constant of D-gluco-
nic acid;
kP
Empirical reaction constant of side reactions of D-
glucose;
θG
θGS
D-Glucose coverage grade of catalyst surface;
D-Gluconic acid coverage grade of catalyst surface;
5. Conclusions
rsurface Reaction rate of surface reaction;
rOR Overall reaction rate;
This investigation highlights the following points:
rSor,G Rate of D-glucose sorption;
rSor,GS Rate of D-gluconic acid sorption;
(i) Nanosized gold particles in the range of 3–6 nm pre-
pared on Black Pearls and Vulcan-type carbons are ac-
tive in liquid-phase oxidation of D-glucose to gluconic
acid. The most active gold catalyst had a specific gold
surface area of 94.2 m2/g.
MC
X
Catalyst concentration;
Conversion of D-glucose;
Selectivity to D-gluconic acid.
S
(ii) Reaction conditions could be optimized with respect
to the reaction rate of D-gluconic acid formation and
the selectivity of the reaction. The best results were
obtained at 50 ◦C and pH 9.5. Reasons for the effect
of temperature and pH on reaction rate of D-gluconic
acid formation were proposed, and on the basis of these
arguments together with the carefully estimated analy-
sis of reaction products, a reaction network was pre-
sented. The reaction could be successfully described by
an oxidative dehydrogenation mechanism in the aque-
ous phase which could be confirmed by experimental
observations.
(iii) It could also be shown that D-glucose oxidation is a
structure-sensitive reaction as a significant increase in
reaction rate could be observed with increasing Au spe-
cific surface area under the same reaction conditions.
(iv) Kinetic runs were carried out neglecting mass transfer
at the phase boundaries by intensive stirring and high
volumetric flow rate of air. By analyzing the effect of
catalyst concentration, initial D-glucose concentration,
and pH value of the liquid phase on reaction rate, it
could be shown that the surface reaction is the rate-
limiting step according to a semiempirical model based
on a Langmuir–Hinshelwood-type pathway. On the ba-
sis of these results, kinetic parameters were calculated
for the first time by an optimization routine and the re-
liability of the determined parameters was checked by
different methods.
References
[1] Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Electronic Release,
[2] F.W. Lichtenthaler, Acc. Chem. Res. 35 (2002) 728–737.
[3] M. Besson, P. Gallezot, in: R.A. Sheldon, H. van Bekkum (Eds.),
Fine Chemicals through Heterogeneous Catalysis, Wiley–VCH, 2001,
pp. 509–510, Chap. 9.3.
[4] M. Besson, P. Gallezot, Catal. Today 81 (2003) 547–559.
[5] S. Biella, L. Prati, M. Rossi, J. Catal. 206 (2002) 242–247.
[6] A. Martin, H. Berndt, I. Pitsch, A. Dittmar, in: Proceedings of 7th
European Workshop on Selective Oxidation, EuropaCat VI, Inns-
[7] S. Biella, G.L. Castiglioni, C. Fumagalli, L. Prati, M. Rossi, Catal.
Today 72 (2002) 43–49.
[8] F. Porta, L. Prati, M. Rossi, S. Coluccia, G. Martra, Catal. Today 61
(2000) 165–172.
[9] C. Bianchi, F. Porta, L. Prati, M. Rossi, Top. Catal. 13 (2000) 231–233.
[10] J.D. Grunwaldt, C. Kiener, C. Wögerbauer, A. Baiker, J. Catal. 181
(1999) 223–232.
[11] P. Claus, S. Schimpf, Y. Önal, in: Proceedings of 18th North American
Catalysis Society Meeting, Cancun, Mexico, June 1–6, 2003, p. 365.
[12] B. Kusserow, S. Schimpf, P. Claus, Adv. Synth. Catal. 345 (2003) 1–
11.
[13] J. Radnik, C. Mohr, P. Claus, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5 (2003) 172–
177.
[15] J.M. Montejano-Carrizales, F. Aguilera-Granja, J.L. Moran-Lopez,
Nanostruct. Mater. 8 (1997) 269–287.