used an Atlantis dC18 reverse-phase column (5 μM, 4.6 × 250 mm with UV-vis
detector at 254 and 220 nm, mobile phase ACN/H2O 30:70 to 90:10 from
0.01–30 min, flow rate 1 mL/min).
isolate the traps from the vaping device. Trap 1 was removed from its liquid N2
bath and allowed to warm to room temperature. Once trap 1 reached room
temperature, it was isolated from trap 2 by closing stopcock 2. Following
isolation of traps 1 and 2 from each other, CDCl3 (1.0 mL) was added to each
trap. Trap 2 was removed from its liquid N2 bath and allowed to warm to room
temperature. The CDCl3 was removed from both traps and immediately ana-
lyzed by NMR. Spiking vape samples with pure benzene and duroquinone
confirmed their assignments. The formation of 8 was confirmed by HPLC, GC-
MS experiments, and accurate mass measurement.
Apparatus for Vape Pyrolysis Trapping Experiments. Glass traps were purchased
from Rettberg GmbH, catalog number 137082015. Rubber tubing was used to
connect vaping device to the glass trap 1, the glass traps together, and glass trap
to the vacuum source. Low-form Dewar flasks (Sigma-Aldrich catalog number
Z150398) were used for liquid nitrogen baths. Schematics of the apparatus
configurations are shown in Fig. 11 and photographs showing the apparatus
material was measured from three independent experiments at 2.4 mg
per puff.
Procedure for Trapping Vape Pyrolysis-Produced Ketene 4 with Benzylamine 9.
All vaping experiments were conducted in a fumehood using the apparatus
setup as shown in Fig. 11C. The vaping device containing 1 was connected via
rubber tubing to the stopcock which in turn was connected to the glass trap,
the outlet of which was connected by rubber tubing to the vacuum source.
Benzylamine 9 (0.02 mL, 0.183 mmol) in CDCl3 (2.0 mL) was added into the glass
trap. The vaping device was turned on for 5 s with an airflow (65 mL/min) ap-
plied, generated by a vacuum, to draw the vapor (puff volume 35 mL) into the
trap. This was repeated 30 times at 30-s intervals and the airflow was stopped by
closing the vacuum. The CDCl3 was removed from the trap and immediately
analyzed by NMR and reverse-phase HPLC (Atlantis dC18 reverse-phase col-
umn, mobile-phase ACN/H2O 30:70 to 90:10 from 0.01–30 min, flow rate 1 mL/min).
Benzylamide 10 was identified in vape mixture NMR by a doublet peak at
4.36 ppm and confirmed by spiking the vape sample with pure 10. HPLC
retention time for benzylamide in the vape mixture was 5.0 min, which was
confirmed by spiking the vape mixture with an authentic sample of 10. The
formation of 10 was confirmed by GC-MS experiments and accurate mass
measurement. Excess of benzylamine was removed by aqueous acid ex-
traction prior to GC-MS analysis. A control experiment showed no formation
of benzylamide 10 following mixing 1 and 9 in CDCl3 for 24 h.
Procedure for Vape Pyrolysis with Low-Temperature Trapping. Vaping exper-
iments were conducted in a fumehood using the apparatus setup as shown in
Fig. 11A. The vaping device containing 1 was connected via rubber tubing to
the stopcock which in turn was connected to the glass trap, the outlet of
which was connected by rubber tubing to the vacuum source. Once assem-
bled the glass trap was placed into a liquid N2 bath for 2 min and vaping
then commenced. The vaping device was turned on for 5 s with an airflow
(65 mL/min) applied, generated by a vacuum, to draw the vapor (puff vol-
ume 35 mL) into the trap. This was repeated 8 times at 30-s intervals and the
airflow was stopped by closing the vacuum. To analyze the vaped material,
the trap was isolated from the vaping device by closing the stopcock, CDCl3
(1.0 mL) was added to the trap, the trap removed from the liquid N2 bath,
and allowed to warm to room temperature. The CDCl3 was removed from
the trap and immediately analyzed by NMR.
Procedure for Vape Pyrolysis with Low-Temperature Trapping and Separation
of VC from NVC. All vaping experiments were conducted in a fumehood using
the apparatus setup as shown in Fig. 11B. The vaping device containing 1 was
connected via rubber tubing to stopcock 1 which was connected to glass trap
1. The outlet of glass trap 1 was connected to stopcock 2, which was connected
to trap 2 which was connected by rubber tubing to the vacuum source. Once
assembled, glass traps 1 and 2 were placed into individual liquid N2 baths for
2 min and vaping then commenced. The vaping device was turned on for 5 s
with an airflow (65 mL/min) applied, generated by a vacuum, to draw the
vapor (puff volume 35 mL) into trap 1. This was repeated 8 times at 30-s in-
tervals, the airflow stopped by closing the vacuum, and stopcock 1 closed to
Data and Materials Availability. All data are available in the main text or SI
Appendix. Raw data files are available from the corresponding author upon
request.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. D.W. acknowledges the Synthesis and Solid State
Pharmaceutical Centre for postdoctoral funding support. Thanks to the Irish
Centre for High-End Computing and Dr. G. Sanchez for use of computational
hardware and software resources. Thanks to Emmet Campion (RCSI) for
assistance with mass spectrometry and NMR experiments.
1. H. Ledford, Scientists chase cause of mysterious vaping illness as death toll rises.
Nature 574, 303–304 (2019).
15. R. M. Mendenhall, H. E. Stokinger, Tolerance and cross-tolerance development to
atmospheric pollutants ketene and ozone. J. Appl. Physiol. 14, 923–926 (1959).
16. L. S. Hardison, Jr, E. Wright, A. F. Pizon, Phosgene exposure: A case of accidental
industrial exposure. J. Med. Toxicol. 10, 51–56 (2014).
17. J. F. Treon et al., Physiologic response of animals exposed to air-borne ketene. J. Ind.
Hyg. Toxicol. 31, 209–219 (1949).
18. M. J. Frisch et al., Gaussian 09 (Revision A.1, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2009).
19. R. Taylor, The mechanism of thermal eliminations, part 25. Arrhenius data for py-
rolysis of isochroman-3-one, benzyl methyl ether, 2-hydroxyethylbenzene, phenyl
acetate, and 3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 183–189 (1988).
20. E. Ghibaudi, A. J. Colussi, Very low pressure pyrolysis of phenyl acetate. Int. J. Chem.
Kinet. 16, 1575–1583 (1984).
21. J. Bland, G. da Silva, A detailed chemical kinetic model for pyrolysis of the lignin
model compound chroman. AIMS Environ. Sci. 1, 12–25 (2014).
22. K. A. Persson, S. Berg, M. Törnqvist, G. P. Scalia-Tomba, L. Ehrenberg, Note on ethene
and other low-molecular weight hydrocarbons in environmental tobacco smoke. Acta
Chem. Scand. B 42, 690–696 (1988).
2. M. C. Madison et al., Electronic cigarettes disrupt lung lipid homeostasis and innate
immunity independent of nicotine. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 4290–4304 (2019).
3. B. C. Blount et al.; Lung Injury Response Laboratory Working Group, Vitamin E acetate
in bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid associated with EVALI. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 697–705
(2020).
4. M. A. Keen, I. Hassan, Vitamin E in dermatology. Indian Dermatol. Online J. 7, 311–
315 (2016).
5. J. E. Layden et al., Pulmonary illness related to E-cigarette use in Illinois and Wis-
consin–Preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med., 10.1056/NEJMoa1911614 (2019).
6. S. D. Maddock et al., Pulmonary lipid-laden macrophages and vaping. N. Engl. J. Med.
381, 1488–1489 (2019).
7. T. S. Henry, J. P. Kanne, S. J. Kligerman, Imaging of vaping-associated lung disease. N.
Engl. J. Med. 381, 1486–1487 (2019).
8. Y. M. Butt et al., Pathology of vaping-associated lung injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 381,
1780–1781 (2019).
9. W. Chen et al., Measurement of heating coil temperature for e-cigarettes with a “top-
coil” clearomizer. PLoS One 13, e0195925 (2018).
23. K. G. Darrall, J. A. Figgins, R. D. Brown, G. F. Phillips, Determination of benzene and
associated volatile compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke. Analyst (Lond.) 123,
1095–1101 (1998).
24. M. L. Rubinstein, K. Delucchi, N. L. Benowitz, D. E. Ramo, Adolescent exposure to toxic
volatile organic chemicals from e-cigarettes. Pediatrics 141, e20173557 (2018).
25. A. G. Siraki, T. S. Chan, P. J. O’Brien, Application of quantitative structure-toxicity
relationships for the comparison of the cytotoxicity of 14 p-benzoquinone conge-
ners in primary cultured rat hepatocytes versus PC12 cells. Toxicol. Sci. 81, 148–159
(2004).
10. O. Geiss, I. Bianchi, J. Barrero-Moreno, Correlation of volatile carbonyl yields emitted
by e-cigarettes with the temperature of the heating coil and the perceived sensorial
quality of the generated vapours. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 219, 268–277 (2016).
11. C. D. Hurd, F. H. Blunck, The pyrolysis of esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 2419–2425
(1938).
12. H. Nakata, A. Tatematsu, Mechanism of mass spectral ketene elimination from phenyl
acetates. Org. Mass Spectrom. 5, 1343–1344 (1971).
13. R. Miller, C. Abaecherli, A. Said, B. Jackson, “Ketenes” in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of
Industrial Chemistry (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany,
2012), vol. 20, pp. 171–183.
26. Zs. Czégény et al., Thermal behavior of selected flavour ingredients and additives
under simulated cigarette combustion and tobacco heating conditions. J. Anal. Appl.
Pyrolysis 121, 990–204 (2016).
14. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Ketene. https://www.
27. X. Wang et al., Synthesis and biological evaluation of phenoxyacetic acid derivatives
as novel free fatty acid receptor 1 agonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 23, 132–140 (2015).
Wu and O’Shea
PNAS
|
March 24, 2020
|
vol. 117
|
no. 12
|
6355