Table 3. Isolated yield and purity of 2
wt %
yield
(%)
process
form
1
3
4
others (%)
methylene chloride
crystalline
amorphous
0.1-0.3%
0.3-1.0%
0.4-1.0%
1.2-2.0%
1.0-1.7%
85
99
90-110 ppm
0.10-0.18
toluene
laba
crystalline
amorphous
crystalline
amorphous
specification
<0.1%
<0.05%
0.23-0.52%
0.24-0.59%
0.70-1.17%
0.65-1.36%
92-93
99
82-92
99
190-245 ppm
505-715 ppm
100-135 ppm
<450 ppm
0.01-0.03%
0.10-0.13%
0.17-0.35%
<2%
planta
0.07-0.08
<0.5
<2%
a Average of three batches.
% of 1, since it was poorly rejected by crystallization of 2
(see Table 2). Following crystallization, the isolated solid
was heated in water at a pH of 4-5 to a melt to convert it
to an amorphous final product (non-polymorph A6). Levels
of 1 decreased slightly during this transformation.
Table 4. Molar balance of palmitates
moles
2
3
4
total
produced
isolated
mother liquor
∆
2956
2817
81.9
-57
3.4
5.4
13.2
115.4
25.0
113.8
+23.4
3075
2847
208.9
-19
The toluene process was demonstrated at the 6000-L scale
in the equipment used for the production of 2. Reaction
selectivity was as observed in the laboratory. As the reactor
loadings were equivalent to the production process, the
palmitoyl chloride addition time required to maintain the
reaction temperature below 5 °C was also equivalent. Six
water washes were necessary to remove the residual 1, a
decrease from the original process. Elimination of the
methylene chloride solvent exchange also decreased the total
processing time, increasing the throughput for the plant.
Isolated yield and purity analysis results for the crystalline
and amorphous forms of 2 are listed in Table 3. The isolated
yield over three 700 to 1000 kg batches averaged 87%, with
a high of 92%. Yield and product quality was improved over
the production process, but was lower than that obtained in
the laboratory. Comparing the laboratory- and plant-scale
results, the isolated yields were higher and the impurity levels
were lower in the laboratory, although the reaction selectivi-
ties, as indicated by analysis at the end of the acid chloride
addition, were similar. This was due to trans-esterification,
especially during the methylene chloride solvent exchange,
which increased the levels of 3 and 4, and decreased the
isolated yield from the process. During the work-up and
solvent exchange of a methylene chloride reaction mixture
in the laboratory, the level of 3 increased from 0.19 to 0.40
mol %, and the level of 4 increased from 6.46 to 7.70 mol
%, decreasing the level of 2 from 92.1 to 91.3 mol %. Some
degree of trans-esterification also occurred during the
extended processing time in the plant-scale trial of the toluene
process, as seen by the molar balance calculations of Table
4. No new impurities were found in the isolated product from
the new process. All of the unidentified minor impurities
detected by HPLC analysis were present in the methylene
chloride production product.
+15.2
increases in isolated yield, product quality, and throughput
over the process in methylene chloride. Reaction selectivity
was well modeled by simple expressions derived from the
rate equations for parallel consecutive reactions, which
predicted the product distribution using a 1000 to 1 difference
in the rate constants for reaction at the primary and secondary
hydroxyl groups of 1. Small increases in the impurity levels
found upon scale-up to 1000 kg were due to trans-
esterification during processing but were less than those
observed during processing using methylene chloride as the
solvent.
Experimental Section
Raw materials were obtained from the Garessio Chloram-
phenicol production plant. HPLC analysis was carried out
at λ ) 254 nm by injecting a 20 µL sample dissolved in
mobile phase onto a 4.6 × 250 mm ZORBAX SIL column
and eluting at 2 mL/min with 4.8 vol % 2-propanol in hexane.
Molar response factors were determined using standard
samples. Final product analyses were carried out by the
Garessio Quality Control Laboratory using established
methods.
Preparation of 2. A 1-L flask was charged with 100 g
(0.3905 mol) of chloramphenicol (1) and 400 mL of toluene,
and 50 mL of solvent was removed by vacuum distillation
to remove residual water. The slurry was chilled to -4 °C,
and 50 mL of toluene, 50 g of DMF, and 28.1 g (0.335 mol)
of pyridine were added. Palmitoyl chloride (90.2 g, 0.328
mol) was added dropwise over 140 min. The final reaction
temperature was 5 °C. After 2.5 h, the slurry was warmed
to 25 °C, and a few drops of 30% hydrogen peroxide in
water were added to remove the pink color. HPLC analysis
found 93.7 mol % of 2, 4.1 mol % of 4, 0.22 mol % of 3,
and 2.0 mol % of 1. The solution was washed with 200 mL
portions of water (1 × 25 °C, 1 × 45 °C, 5 × 60 °C) at a
pH of 3.5 (hydrochloric acid) to give 0.25 mol % of 1
remaining. The solution was cooled to 0 °C, and the solid
Conclusions
The process for the preparation of 2 in toluene and DMF
was developed and demonstrated at the production scale, with
(6) Mitra, A. K.; Ghosh, L. K.; Gupta, B. K. Drug DeV. Ind. Pharm. 1993, 19,
971-80.
Vol. 4, No. 4, 2000 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
303