1610
M. Kabata et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 1607–1611
10. (a) Molander, G. A.; Shakya, S. R. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
References and notes
59, 3445; (b) Shabangi, M.; Sealy, J. M.; Fuchs, J. R.;
Flowers, R. A., II. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4429.
11. (a) Mikkelsen, L. M.; Krintel, S. L.; Jimenez-Barbero, J.;
Skrydstrup, T. Chem. Commun. 2000, 2319; (b) Otaka, A.;
Yukimasa, A.; Watanabe, J.; Sasaki, Y.; Oishi, S.;
Tamamura, H.; Fujii, N. Chem. Commun. 2003,
1834.
12. We have recently communicated the result that treatment
of unsubstituted simple lactams with aldehydes in the
presence of SmI2 undergoes a novel N–C(hetero)-coupling
reaction instead of the pinacolic-type one to generate N-a-
hydroxyalkylated products, which could be applied to the
synthesis of some biologically active indolizidine natural
products.9e
13. We could not prepare the hydroxyalkylated imide 2 from
direct coupling reaction of N-benzylsuccinimide with
butanal in the presence of base (cf. Lozzi, L.; Ricci, A.;
Taddei, M. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 3408).
14. For examples, see: (a) Rieser, M. J.; Kozlowski, J. F.;
Wood, K. V.; McLaughlin, J. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991,
32, 1137; (b) Baussanne, I.; Schwardt, O.; Royer, J.;
1. (a) Girard, P.; Namy, J.-L.; Kagan, H. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1980, 102, 2693; (b) Namy, J.-L.; Girard, P.; Kagan,
H. B. Nouv. J. Chim. 1977, 1, 5; (c) Kagan, H. B. New. J.
Chem. 1990, 14, 453.
2. For recent reviews, see: (a) Kagan, H. B.; Namy, J.-L.;
Girard, P. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 175; (b) Kagan, H. B.;
Namy, J.-L. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 6573; (c) Kagan, H. B.;
Sasaki, M.; Collin, J. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988, 60, 1725; (d)
Molander, G. A. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 29; (e) Molander,
G. A. Org. React. 1994, 46, 211; (f) Molander, G. A.;
Harris, C. R. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 307; (g) Molander, G.
A.; Harris, C. R. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 3321; (h)
Molander, G. A.; Sono, M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 9289;
(i) Mochrouhi, F.; Namy, J.-L. Tetrahedron 1998, 54,
11111; (j) Krief, A.; Laval, A. M. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99,
745; (k) Matsuda, F. J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 2001, 59,
92; (l) Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 10351.
3. (a) Otsubo, K.; Inanaga, J.; Yamaguchi, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 5763; (b) Fukuzawa, S.; Seki, K.; Tatsu-
zawa, M.; Mutoh, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1482;
(c) Mikami, K.; Yamaoka, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
4501; (d) Riber, D.; Hazell, R.; Skrydstrup, T. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 65, 5382.
4. (a) Souppe, J.; Namy, J.-L.; Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1984, 25, 2869; (b) Mochrouhi, F.; Namy, J.-L.;
Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7183.
5. Mochrouhi, F.; Parlea, E.; Namy, J.-L. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 2431.
6. (a) Molander, G. A.; McKie, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58,
7216; (b) Mochrouhi, F.; Namy, J.-L.; Kagan, H. B.
Synlett 1996, 633.
`
´
Pichon, M.; Figadere, B.; Cave, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
38, 2259; (c) Capon, R. J.; Barrow, R. A.; Rochfort, S.;
Jobling, M.; Skene, C.; Lacey, E.; Gill, J. H.; Friedel, T.;
Wadsworth, D. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 2227.
15. Relative threo/erythro stereochemistry of 2 obtained was
unambiguously proved after MOM-protection by com-
paring its spectral data with those of the synthesized
compound 9 elaborated through crucial manipulations
from the lactone 4 according to our previous reports16 as
shown below:
O
O
CH OH
Me N
1) Swern oxid.
2
OH
ref. 16
Me NH
2
2
OTBDPS
OTBDPS
OTBDPS
HO
2
O
O
O
HOH C
O
O
2) C H MgBr
5
3
7
6
4
OH
quant.
3) p-TsOH
71%
OMOM
OMOM
OMOM
H
H
1) BnNH
Swern oxid.
PCC
45%
2
BnHN
2) MOMCl
O
O
O
N
Bn
N
Bn
46%
43%
3) Bu NF
8
OH
7
9
4
O
OH
7. (a) Ha, D.-C.; Yun, C.-S.; Yu, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 2577; (b) Ha, D.-C.; Yun, C.-S.; Lee, Y. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 621; (c) Farcas, S.; Namy, J.-L. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 7299; (d) Farcas, S.; Namy, J.-L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 879.
8. (a) Yoda, H.; Matsuda, K.; Nomura, H.; Takabe, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 1775; (b) Yoda, H.; Ujihara,
Y.; Takabe, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 9225.
9. (a) Ogawa, A.; Takami, N.; Nanke, T.; Ohya, S.; Hirao, T.
Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 12895; (b) Kikukawa, T.; Hana-
moto, T.; Inanaga, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7497; (c)
Molander, G. A.; Etter, J. B.; Zinke, P. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1987, 109, 453; (d) McDonald, C. E.; Galka, A. M.;
Green, A. I.; Keane, J. M.; Kowalchick, J. E.; Micklitsch,
C. M.; Wisnoski, D. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 163;
(e) Yoda, H.; Katoh, H.; Ujihara, Y.; Takabe, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2509; (f) Ricci, M.; Blakskjaer,
P.; Skrydstrup, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12413,
and references cited therein; (g) Blakskær, P.; Gavrila, A.;
Andersen, L.; Skrydstrup, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
9091; (h) Zheng, X.; Feng, C.-G.; Ye, J.-L.; Huang, P.-Q.
Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 553.
The other compounds were also estimated to have the
same stereochemistry based on the similarity of its spectral
data to those of threo-2 (R = Bn).
16. (a) Yoda, H.; Kimura, K.; Takabe, K. Synlett 2001, 400;
(b) Yoda, H.; Maruyama, K.; Takabe, K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 1775; (c) Yoda, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Takabe, K.
Heterocycles 2005, 65, 519.
17. The observed stereochemical outcome of these reactions
can be explained by consideration using six-membered
SmI2-chelation model containing nitrogen lone-paired
electrons as described below. In the thermodynamically
stable form in which the larger N-substituent would
occupy the equatorial position, the reaction progressed
through coupling of the radical produced by desulfuriza-
tion with a carbonyl compound. In this case the attack of
the radical present in the chelation model occurred from
the face avoiding the mutual steric repulsion between SmI2
and an aldehyde-alkyl group. In addition, the alkyl
function would also prefer to be equatorial resulting in
an increase of the threo-selectivity. Additional studies on
the precise mechanistic origin of these reactions are in
progress.