Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
4-N-, 4-S-, and 4-O-Chloroquine Analogues
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2008, Vol. 51, No. 12 3467
affinities also differ strongly depending on pH and other
variables. The point being that even subtle modifications to CQ
can confer preference for one chemical form of FPIX vs another
(i.e., Fe[III] monomer vs µ-oxo dimer or vice versa), making
these compounds more or less active than CQ in the presence
of a given FPIX composition. Changes in FPIX composition
are a key prediction of the altered DV physiology known to
exist for CQR parasites.20,21
modifications of the CQ structure. These include that simulta-
neously fine-tuning both basicity of the quinolyl N and the length
of the CQ side chain may be important for optimizing
interactions with FPIX and that basicity of the tertiary aliphatic
N for CQ is important for accumulation within the parasite DV
but not for previously predicted ionic stabilization of CQ-FPIX
structures. Along with these principles, previous studies25,26 have
demonstrated that desethyl CQ has similar activity relative to
CQ for CQS strains but lower activity vs some CQR strains of
P. falciparum. In addition, shortening or lengthening the
aliphatic side chain of CQ has in general been shown to have
little effect on the activity vs CQS strains but to increase activity
vs CQR strains.9,11,26 However, these two modifications have
not previously been systematically varied in tandem, which
might result in additive or opposing effects. Below we report
data that test the above structure-function predictions for CQ
analogues.
Until very recently, design and synthesis of additional CQ
analogues guided by experimentally determined, atomic level
resolution drug-drug target structures has not been possible.
Many previous modifications have been addressed by combi-
natorial synthetic strategies, but how those modifications might
influence formation of a drug-target complex has been difficult
to rationalize or predict. Also, comparison between activity for
many of the CQ derivatives that have been made is difficult
because different strains of malaria have been used, and activity
3
has been assayed in multiple ways (e.g., via H hypoxanthine
Compounds 1-10. Compounds 1-10 were designed to
systematically explore the relationship between mono- vs diethyl
substitution at the terminal aliphatic N and the length of the
aliphatic side chain vs activity against CQS and CQR parasites
(Table 1). These compounds were prepared in two steps from
4,7-dichloroquinoline and a series of R,ω-diamines. The ami-
nation reaction proceeded at elevated temperatures with high
yields and the subsequent alkylation with ethyl bromide gave a
mixture of approximately 50% of the desired secondary and
tertiary amine, leaving about 50% of remaining starting materials
that were recovered in all cases (see Scheme 1). Aminoquino-
lines 1-10 were then analyzed for activity vs two CQS and
two CQR laboratory strains of P. falciparum using a new semi-
high-throughput SYBR Green I based assay. This assay was
developed independently in two laboratories,22,23 is easily
standardized, and was recently validated vs a large collection
of antimalarial compounds by the Walter Reed Army Institute.24
As described below and in the Discussion section, standardiza-
tion of the activity of candidate antimalarials against different
strains and species of Plasmodium is essential for future
progress, and the SYBR Green I assay offers one inexpensive
route that should be accessible to most laboratories engaged in
malaria research.
incorporation, lactate dehydrogenase activity, DNA staining,
etc.). These assays measure growth inhibition and/or death of
parasite cultures in different ways and thus do not report
identical IC50 data. Furthermore, most published modifications
to CQ have not included systematic, subtle alterations (e.g.,
iterative addition or substitution of single atoms) that can provide
clues to important structure-function principles.
In this study, we have analyzed a series of specific modifica-
tions to CQ that are predicted to be relevant for CQ activity vs
CQR parasites based on four considerations: (1) the geometry
of quinoline vs FPIX µ-oxo dimer structures we have recently
solved,16,18 (2) the existence of coordinate CQ-FPIX monomer
complexes under conditions that mimic those of the DV,19 (3)
differences in DV pH that have been deduced for CQS and CQR
parasites,20,21 (4) previous observations that the CQ side chain
length alters selectivity for CQR vs CQS parasites.9,11 We have
measured the activity of these rationally designed compounds
vs two CQ sensitive (CQS) and two CQ resistant (CQR) strains
using a standardized, easily validated, and inexpensive new
assay based on SYBR Green I intercalation that has recently
been adopted and validated by a number of laboratories.22–24
Takentogether,ourresultssuggestimportantnewstructure-function
principles for quinoline antimalarial drug design based on
chloroquine, including (1) replacement of the terminal tertiary
amino function by a secondary moiety reduces the potency vs
CQR strains, which suggests the side chain amino group is
recognized by the CQ resistance mechanism, (2) substitution
of S or O for N at position 4 significantly alters the quinolyl N
basicity and lowers the antimalarial potency while improving
the selectivity index (defined as the ratio of CQR strain IC50/
CQS strain IC50), (3) introduction of an additional basic amino
group to the side chain of 4-O CQ derivatives can improve the
potency while retaining an improved selectivity index, and (4)
surprisingly, no straightforward relationships between the ability
to bind FPIX µ-oxo dimer vs inhibition of Hz formation and
antimalarial potency exists for this series of CQ derivatives.
Aminoquinolines 3-5 are novel and have not previously been
analyzed vs malarial parasites, whereas 1, 2 and 6-10 have
been synthesized previously27–30 using similar but not identical
methods (Scheme 1) and tested vs less commonly used
laboratory strains of P. falciparum. Assessment of the activities
of all of these related CQ analogues has not previously been
standardized using the same strains, culture conditions, and
malarial growth inhibition assays. HB3 (CQS, Honduras) and
Dd2 (CQR, Indochina) are parents of a genetic cross that
produced a collection of progeny (GC03 [CQS] being one) for
which a very large amount of data has been collected regarding
thebiochemistryandgeneticsofchloroquinedrugresistance.15,31,32
Strain FCB (CQR, SE Asia) expresses similar CQR-causing
PfCRT mutations relative to Dd2,15 yet in most laboratories
shows 50-100% higher levels of CQR relative to Dd2. As such,
these strains are valuable reference points for future quinoline-
based antimalarial drug design guided by ongoing elucidation
of the CQR mechanism(s).
Results
Recently this consortium was the first to experimentally define
atomic level resolution structures for CQ, QN, quinidine (QD),
and AQ vs µ-oxo dimer FPIX,16,18 as well as the existence of
a coordinate CQ-monomeric FPIX complex under acidic
aqueous conditions.19 Other data suggest that DV pH may differ
for CQS vs CQR parasites.20 As previously suggested,16,18–20
these data led to several structure-function predictions for CQ
analogues that can now be systematically tested via strategic
We measured similar, but not identical, IC50 for 1, 2 vs CQS
(HB3, GC03) and CQR (Dd2, FCB) parasites, consistent with
earlier work that assayed CQS strains NF54 and Haiti 135 or
CQR strains K1 and Indochina I.26 Differences in precise IC50
are likely due to strain variation, our use of synchronized culture
vs asynchronous culture by others, the use of 3H hypoxanthine