C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Photocatalytic Transformation of 1,2,4-Trisubstituted
Chlorophenols Promoted on Various Catalysts
Acknowledgment. This work is supported by the Grant-in-Aids
for Scientific Research (No. 15360430) and on Priority Areas
a
“
Fundamental Science and Technology of Photofunctional Inter-
faces (417)” (No. 15033244) from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT).
Supporting Information Available: Materials and methods, dis-
cussion, tables, and figures. This material is available free of charge
via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
(
1) Coyle, J. D.; Carless, H. A. C. Photochemistry in Organic Synthesis; Royal
Society of Chemistry: London, 1986.
(
2) Fox, M. A.; Dulay, M. T. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 341-357.
3) Fujishima, A.; Rao, T. N.; Tryk, D. A. J. Photochem. Photobiol., C:
Photochem. ReV. 2000, 1, 1-21.
(
(
4) Centi, G.; Trifiro, F. New DeVelopments in SelectiVe Oxidation; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, 1990.
a
Conditions: substrates, 20 µmol; catalyst, 10 mg; photoirradiation time,
(5) Arends, I. W. C. E.; Sheldon, R. A.; Wallau, M.; Schuchardt, U. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1144-1163.
2
h; H2O, 10 mL; temperature, 313 K. b EMW: 10 (0.5762 nm); 19 (0.6051
nm); 21 (0.6149 nm); 23 (0.6431 nm).
(6) Kuznicki, S. M.; Bell, V. A.; Nair, S.; Hillhouse, H. W.; Jacubinas, R.
M.; Braunbarth, C. M.; Toby, B. H.; Tsapatsis, M. Nature 2001, 412,
720-724.
and the activity is triggered by a combination of the short-lived
(7) Anpo, M. Photofunctional Zeolites; Nova Science Publishers Inc.: New
3
+
-
York, 2000.
[
Ti -O
L
]* and the restricted diffusion of a molecule inside the
(Figure 2D) is, therefore,
(
8) (a) Zhang, S. G.; Ichihashi, Y.; Yamashita, H.; Tatsumi, T.; Anpo, M.
Chem. Lett. 1996, 895-896. (b) Yamashita, H.; Fujii, Y.; Ichihashi, Y.;
Zhang, S. G.; Ikeue, K.; Park, D. R.; Koyano, K.; Tatsumi, T.; Anpo, M.
Catal. Today 1998, 45, 221-227. (c) Yeom, Y. H.; Frei, H. J. Phys. Chem.
A 2001, 105, 5334-5339. (d) Yamagata, S.; Nishijo, M.; Murao, N.; Ohta,
S.; Mizoguchi, I. Zeolites 1995, 15, 490-493. (e) Yoshida, H.; Murata,
C.; Hattori, T. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1551-1152.
pore. Zero conversion on Ti-SiO
attributed to the lack of the pore that regulates the motion of
substrates.26
The size-screening catalytic activity, inspired by titanosilicate
molecular sieves, is highlighted by their application to a selective
transformation of 1,2,4-trisubstituted harmful chlorophenols (Table
). Photoirradiation of bulk TiO with 21 (run 1) afforded the
2
corresponding trihydroxylated benzene derivative 10, which is
nontoxic and industrially valuable, as an initial product via a
hydroxyl radical addition.14 The yield of 10 is, however, signifi-
cantly low (1%) because the sequential decomposition of 10 occurs
on TiO
than the TS-1 and TS-2 pores, respectively, thus allowing effective
photoconversion of 21 on both catalysts (>65%) (runs 2 and 3).
On these catalysts, the substitution of -Cl by -OH also occurs,
via reaction of 21 trapped on the O
formed by a reduction of O
2
(9) (a) Corbin, D. R.; Herron, N. J. Mol. Catal. 1994, 86, 343-369. (b)
Tatsumi, T.; Nakamura, M.; Negishi, S.; Tominaga, H. Chem. Commun.
1990, 476-477.
1
(
10) (a) Ramamurthy, V.; Eaton, D. F.; Casper, J. V. Acc. Chem. Res. 1992,
2
5, 299-307. (b) Ramamurthy, V.; Shailaja, J.; Kaanumalle, L. S.; Sunoj,
R. B.; Chandrasekhar, J. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1987-1999. (c) Corma,
A.; Garcia, H. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1443-1459.
(11) Degnan, T. F., Jr. J. Catal. 2003, 216, 32-46.
(
(
12) Clerici, M. G.; Bellussi, G.; Romano, U. J. Catal. 1991, 129, 159-167.
13) Reddy, J. S.; Kumar, R. J. Catal. 1991, 130, 440-446.
14,27
2
.
The EMW of 21 (0.6149 nm) is 12 and 15% larger
(14) See Supporting Information.
(
15) Bordiga, S.; Coluccia, S.; Lamberti, C.; Marchese, L. Zecchina, A.;
Boscherini, F.; Buffa, F.; Genoni, F.; Leofanti, G.; Petrini, G.; Vlaic, G.
J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 4125-4132.
(
(
16) Cox, S. D.; Gier, T. E.; Stucky, G. D. Chem. Mater. 1990, 2, 609-619.
17) Calculations were performed with the MNDO-PM3 method within the
WinMOPAC version 3.0 software (Fujitsu Inc.). Molecular thickness of
the substrates is <0.3 nm, which is rather smaller than the pore diameter
of the catalysts, such that the thickness is not considered in this study.
18) J a¨ ger, R. Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 10, 247-256.
-
L
site with a superoxide anion
on the Ti3+ site. Astoundingly,
14
2
excellent high selectivity of 10 was obtained on TS-1 (85%) and
TS-2 (> 99%). Since the -OH is less bulky than -Cl, the EMW
of 10 (0.5762 nm) is 6% smaller than that of 21 and is only 5 and
(
(19) Anderson, C.; Bard, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2611-2616.
(
20) Hsien, Y.-H.; Chang, C.-F.; Chen, Y.-H.; Cheng, S. Appl. Catal. B 2001,
1, 241-249.
(21) Murata, C.; Yoshida, H.; Kumagai, J.; Hattori, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003,
3
8
% larger than the TS-1 and TS-2 pores, respectively, thus allowing
107, 4364-4373.
relatively smooth diffusion of 10 inside the pores. Sequential
reaction of 10 on the catalysts, therefore, scarcely occurs, thus
affording 10 in high selectivity. These catalysts also promoted
selective transformation of dichlorophenols (19 and 23) into 10 in
high selectivity (>80%) (runs 8, 9, 11, and 12), where in both cases
intermediately formed 21 is sequentially transformed into 10. The
above findings demonstrate that the titanosilicate molecular sieves
shave” a molecule, interlocked inside the pore, into a smoothly
(
22) Ikeue, K.; Yamashita, H.; Anpo, M.; Takewaki, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001,
105, 8350-8355.
3+
(
23) Double integration of the Ti signal on ESR spectra (Figure 3ii) indicates
3
+
that decrease in the Ti intensity in the presence of H
2
O (56 mmol/g of
catalyst) is 12% (TS-1) and 82% (Ti-SiO ), based on the intensity
2
2
obtained in vacuo (Figure 3i). Surface hydrophilicity of Ti-SiO is
significantly higher than that of TS-1 (Supporting Information Table S1;
14
3+
monolayer adsorption capacity of H O). The strong Ti deactivation on
2
3+
-
L
2 2
Ti-SiO is, therefore, due to the enhanced access of H O to [Ti -O ]*.
(
(
(
24) van Koningsveld, H.; Jansen, J. C. Microporous Mater. 1996, 6, 159-
167. The straight pore dimension of silicalite-1 (0.52 × 0.58 nm) changes
to 0.46 × 0.64 nm (9.4% expansion) in the presence of naphthalene.
“
diffusive slim molecule. In general, harmful chlorophenols are
treated (detoxificated) by chemical28 and photochemical
3
+
25) Relative Ti intensity on TS-1, obtained by double integration of ESR
spectra, is 1 (in vacuo), 0.99 [with acetonitrile (56 mmol/g of catalyst)],
3,27
total
2
and 0.88 [with H O (56 mmol/g of catalyst)].
destruction processes. The present molecular shave catalytic system
enables the detoxification of chlorophenols and the synthesis of
valuable phenol derivatives all at once, proving that this “green”
photocatalyst may contribute to the development of an economically
and environmentally friendly chemical process.
In conclusion, we have found the size-screening photocatalytic
activity of titanosilicate molecular sieves. Various titanosilicate
molecular sieves, of different pore sizes and structures, have so far
been synthesized using a structure directing agent. The catalytic
system based on titanosilicate molecular sieves has the potential
to become a very powerful tool for photocatalytic organic synthesis.
26) A question arising is why the amount of substrates adsorbed on the catalyst
surface does not affect the substrate conversion on TS-1 and TS-2
(Supporting Information Table S2), although the substrate adsorption may
occur mainly inside the pore of high surface area and the strongly adsorbed
3+
-
substrate is likely to be trapped easily by [Ti -O ]*. The substrate
L
adsorption may occur mainly on the silicious surface of the catalysts
3
+
-
L
because of very low Ti content. The substrate trapping by [Ti -O ]*
is, therefore, not related to the degree of the substrate adsorption.
(27) D’Oliveira, J.-C.; Minero, C.; Pelizzetti, E.; Pichat, P. J. Photochem.
Photobiol., A: Chem. 1993, 72, 261-267.
(
28) Gupta, S. S.; Stadler, M.; Noser, C. A.; Ghosh, A.; Steinhoff, B.; Lenoir,
D.; Horwitz, C. P.; Schramn, K.-W.; Collins, T. J. Science 2002, 296,
326-328.
JA042707H
8306 J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 127, NO. 23, 2005