96
T. Stringer et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 69 (2013) 90e98
4.2.2. Compound 4
few drops of 10.1 M HCl was added. Ferrocenecarboxaldehyde
(0.331 g, 1.55 mmol) was added to the suspension and the reaction
mixture stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The precipitate was
filtered, washed with water and dried in vacuo. Yield: 0.453 g, 98%. IR
(cmꢁ1): 3437 (NeH); 3267 (NeH); 1611 (C]N); 816 (C]S). 1H NMR
Compound 4 was prepared from 2 (1.49 g, 4.56 mmol) and 1,3-
propanediamine (0.117 g, 1.56 mmol). Yield: 0.818 g, 85%; IR
(cmꢁ1): 3258 (NeH); 1613 (C]N); 1138 (C]S); 1H NMR (DMSO-
d6):
d ppm 1.73 (2H, m, CH2); 1.90 (4H, m, CH2); 3.30 (4H, m, CH2);
3
3.40 (4H, m, CH2); 3.51 (4H, m, CH2); 6.46 (2H, d, JHeH ¼ 5.4, Are
(DMSO-d6): d
ppm 3.78 (4H, s, CH2); 4.17 (10H, s, Cp); 4.39 (4H, t, 3JHe
H); 7.19 (2H, m, NH); 7.37e7.47 (6H, m, NH, AreH); 7.77 (2H, d, 4JHe
¼ 1.8, Cp); 4.74 (4H, t, 3JHeH ¼ 1.8, Cp); 7.90 (2H, s, HC]N); 8.36 (2H,
H
3
3
¼ 2.1, AreH); 8.24 (2H, d, JHeH ¼ 9.0, AreH); 8.40 (2H, d, JHe
br s, NH); 11.29 (2H, s, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
d ppm 44.0;
H
H
¼ 5.4, AreH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
d
ppm 27.4; 28.5; 40.9e40.9
68.2; 69.4; 70.5; 79.4; 143.9; 177.2. ESI MS: m/z 601.0582 (100%,
[M þ H]þ). C26H28N6Fe2S2$H2O calculated: C 50.50, H 4.89, N 13.59%;
found: C 50.67, H 4.71, N 13.85%.
(6C); 98.4; 117.2; 123.7; 123.9; 127.0; 133.3; 148.7; 149.9; 151.6;
181.7; ESI MS: m/z 629.1812 (20%, [M þ H]þ); 315.0951 (100%,
[M þ 2H]2þ). C29H34N8S2Cl2$2H2O calculated: C 52.32, H 5.75, N
16.83%; found: C 52.51; H 5.95; N 15.13%.
4.2.7. Compound 12
Compound 12 was prepared from compound 9 (0.506 g,
1.59 mmol) and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (0.0780 g, 0.534 mmol).
Yield: 0.226 g, 46%. IR (cmꢁ1): 3431 (NeH); 3366 (NeH); 1606
4.2.3. Compound 5
Compound
5 was prepared from Compound 2 (0.415 g,
1.27 mmol) and tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (0.0586 g, 0.400 mmol).
(C]N); 818 (C]S); 1103 (ferrocene). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
d ppm
Yield: 0.242 g, 58%. IR (cmꢁ1): 3280 (NeH); 1611 (C]N); 1138
2.83 (6H, m, CH2); 3.71 (6H, m, CH2); 4.18 (15H, s, Cp); 4.41 (6H, m,
(C]S). 1H NMR (CD3OD-d4):
d
ppm 1.96 (6H, m, CH2); 2.66 (12H, m,
Cp); 4.69 (6H, m, Cp); 7.90 (3H, s, HC]N); 8.15 (3H, br s, NH); 11.22
CH2); 3.44e3.74 (12H, m, CH2); 6.44 (3H, m, AreH); 7.31 (3H, m,
AreH); 7.71 (3H, m, AreH); 7.99 (3H, m, AreH); 8.28 (3H, m, AreH).
(3H, s, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
d ppm 43.4; 53.3; 68.0; 69.4;
70.5; 79.4; 143.7; 176.7. ESI-MS: m/z 957.1362 (70%, [M þ H]þ).
13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
d
ppm 27.5; 41.1; 41.6; 52.9; 54.4; 98.5; 117.3;
C42H48N10Fe3S3 calculated: C 52.73, H 5.06, N 14.64%; found: C
123.8 (6C); 127.3; 133.1; 148.9; 149.8; 151.6; 182.2. ESI-MS: m/z 980
(5%, [M þ H]þ); 513 (60%, [M þ 2Na]2þ). C45H54N13S3Cl3$3H2O
calculated: C 52.29, H 5.85, N 17.62%; found: C 52.00; H 6.38; N
16.60%.
52.63, H 5.54, N 13.98%.
4.3. Biological and biophysical assays
4.3.1. In vitro antiplasmodial assay
4.2.4. Compound 6
The test samples were tested in triplicate on one occasion
against chloroquine sensitive (CQS) NF54 strain and chloroquine-
resistant (CQR) Dd2 strain of P. falciparum. Continuous in vitro
cultures of asexual erythrocyte stages of P. falciparum were main-
tained using a modified method of Trager and Jensen [50]. Quan-
titative assessment of antiplasmodial activity in vitro was
determined via the parasite lactate dehydrogenase assay using a
modified method described by Makler et al. [51]. The test samples
were prepared as a 20 mg/ml stock solution in 100% DMSO and
sonicated to enhance solubility. Samples were tested as a suspen-
sion if not completely dissolved. Stock solutions were stored
at ꢁ20 ꢀC. Further dilutions were prepared on the day of the
experiment. Chloroquine (CQ) was used as the reference drug in all
experiments. A full doseeresponse measurement was performed
for all compounds to determine the concentration inhibiting 50% of
parasite growth (IC50 value). Test samples were tested at a starting
concentration of 1000 ng/ml, which was then serially diluted 2-fold
in complete medium to give 10 concentrations; with the lowest
concentration being 2 ng/ml. The same dilution technique was used
for all samples. The highest concentration of solvent to which
the parasites were exposed to had no measurable effect on the
parasite viability. The IC50 values were obtained using a non-linear
doseeresponse curve fitting analysis via GraphPad Prism v.4.0
software. Evaluation is based on means from three independent
experiments.
Compound
6 was prepared from compound 2 (0.888 g,
2.725 mmol) and G1 DAB dendrimer (0.164 g, 0.518 mmol). Yield:
0.092 g, 12%; IR (cmꢁ1): 3272 (NeH); 1611 (C]N); 1138 (C]S). 1H
NMR (DMSO-d6):
d ppm 1.32 (4H, m, CH2); 1.59 (8H, m, CH2); 1.89
(8H, m, CH2); 2.35 (12H, m, CH2); 3.21e3.45 (16H, m, CH2); 3.50
(8H, m, CH2); 6.44 (4H, br d, 3JHeH ¼ 5.4, AreH); 7.19 (4H, br s, NH);
7.41 (12H, m, NH, AreH); 7.77 (4H, d, 4JHeH ¼ 2.2, AreH); 8.25 (4H,
m, AreH); 8.38 (4H, d, JHeH ¼ 5.3, AreH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
3
d
ppm 24.7; 26.8; 28.1; 41.4e42.9 (12C); 51.6; 53.8; 99.1; 117.9;
124.5 (8C); 127.9; 133.8; 149.5; 150.4; 152.3; 182.3; ESI MS: m/z
1429 (70%, [M þ H]þ); C68H88N18S4Cl4$5H2O calculated: C 53.81, H
6.51, N 16.61%; found: C 53.90; H 6.42; N 15.02%.
4.2.5. Compound 10
Compound 9 (0.197 g, 0.618 mmol) was suspended in EtOH
(20 ml). n-Propylamine (0.0430 g, 0.730 mmol) was added to the
suspension and the resulting solution was refluxed under Argon
for 12 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue dis-
solved in DCM (15 ml). The organic layer was washed with water
until the water layer remained clear. The organic extracts were
dried over NaSO4. The solvent was removed in vacuo, to the res-
idue diethyl ether and petroleum ether was added and the product
was allowed to precipitate. Yield: 0.062 g, 30%. IR (cmꢁ1): 3371
(NeH); 3129 (NeH); 1604 (C]N); 816 (C]S); 1090 (ferrocene). 1H
NMR (DMSO-d6):
d
ppm 0.88 (3H, t, 3JHeH ¼ 7.5, CH3); 1.59 (2H, m,
CH2); 3.49 (2H, m, CH2); 4.21 (5H, s, Cp); 4.42 (2H, m Cp); 4.72
4.3.2.
b
-Hematin inhibition assay
b-hematin formation assay was adapted from the method
(2H, m, Cp); 7.89 (1H, s, HC]N); 8.12 (1H, br s, NH); 11.11 (1H, s,
The
NH); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
d
ppm 11.7; 22.7; 45.5; 68.0; 69.4; 70.4;
described by Wright and co-workers [39]. Test compounds were
prepared as a 10 mM stock solution in 100% DMSO. Test samples
79.6; 143.4; 176.8. ESI-MS: m/z 330.0724 (100%, [M þ H]þ).
C
15H19N3FeS calculated: C 54.72, H 5.82, N 12.76%; found: C 53.99;
were tested at a starting concentration of 500
mM and the lowest
H 5.73; N 10.84%.
drug concentration being 5 M. The stock solution was serially
m
By following the same synthetic procedure as that for 10,
compound 12 was synthesized.
diluted to give 12 concentrations in a 96 well flat-bottom assay
plate. NP-40 detergent was then added to mediate the formation of
b
-hematin (30.55
of hematin was prepared by dissolving hemin (16.3 mg) in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) (1 ml). A 177.76 l aliquot of hematin stock was
suspended in 20 ml of a 2 M acetate buffer, pH 4.7. The hematin
mM, final concentration). A 25 mM stock solution
4.2.6. Compound 11
Compound 11 wasprepared fromethane-1,2-dithiosemicarbazide
(0.160 g, 0.767 mmol) which was suspended in H2O (25 ml). To this, a
m