J. Cui et al. / Journal of Catalysis 320 (2014) 26–32
27
Table 1
Water content in Et3NHCl.
copper(I) chloride (P99.00%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
All these chemicals were stored in a glove box.
Technical grade: Triethylamine hydrochloride (98%), aluminum
chloride (anhydrous reagent grade), and copper(I) chloride
(90+%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar.
Et3NHCl
Water in Et3NHCl (mg/kg) Water in Et3NHCl (mmol/mol)
Synthesis grade
Technical grade 440.2
5.9
0.045
3.4
Water content in triethylamine hydrochloride was determined
by Karl Fischer method (Table 1).
Pyridine (P99.50%) and dichloromethane-d2 (99.8%) were pur-
chased from Merck KGaA, dried over molecular sieves 4 Å, and
stored in a glove box.
2.3. NMR analysis
All the samples were prepared in a glove box. An ionic liquid
sample (ca. 35 mg) was placed into an NMR tube (5 mm, borosili-
cate glass). Deuterated dichloromethane was added (ca. 1 mL).
The tube was closed with a standard cap and removed from the
glove box immediately prior to the measurement.
1H and 27Al NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C on an Agilent
NMR spectrometer at 400 and 104 MHz, respectively.
Typical 1H NMR spectral data are as follows (400 MHz, CD2Cl2,
residual CDHCl2 referenced at 5.32 ppm):
BIL with AlCl3 molar fraction of 0.64: d (ppm) 1.43 (t, J = 7.6 Hz,
CH3, 9H), 3.32 (qd, J = 7.4 Hz, J = 5.2 Hz, CH2, 6H), and 5.68 (t,
J = 52.8 Hz, NH, 1H).
BIL + 10 mol% H2O: d (ppm) 1.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, CH3, 9H), 3.31 (qd,
J = 7.4 Hz, J = 5.2 Hz, CH2, 6H), 4.85 (s), and 5.69 (t, J = 53.3 Hz, NH,
1H).
2.2. Preparation of ILs
2.2.1. Basis ionic liquids (Et3NHCl–AlCl3, BILs)
BILs with different AlCl3 molar fractions were prepared accord-
ing to the typical procedure [23] under the protection of dry nitro-
gen using Schlenk techniques. A typical example is given for a BIL
with AlCl3 molar fraction of 0.64 (XAlCl3 = 0.64). Synthesis grade
Et3NHCl (13.77 g, 0.10 mol) was placed in a flask. AlCl3 (99.99%
grade, 24.00 g, 0.18 mol) was slowly added to the flask in 30 min
while keeping the reaction temperature below 80 °C. The mixture
was then heated to 80 °C and maintained at that temperature until
all solids ‘‘dissolved.’’ The BILs were generally formed within 3–4 h.
E (BIL + H2O): d (ppm) 1.41 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, CH3, 9H), 3.31 (qd,
J = 7.4 Hz, J = 5.2 Hz, CH2, 6H), 4.85 (s), and 5.71 (t, J = 52.0 Hz,
NH, 1H).
Dry CIL: d (ppm) 1.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, CH3, 9H), 3.31 (qd, J = 7.4 Hz,
J = 5.2 Hz, CH2, 6H), and 5.97 (t, J = 52.0 Hz, NH, 1H).
Wet CIL: d (ppm) 1.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, CH3, 9H), 3.30 (qd, J = 7.4 Hz,
J = 5.2 Hz, CH2, 6H), 4.81 (s), and 5.96 (t, J = 51.6 Hz, NH, 1H). The
precise integral ratio was CH3: CH2: NH: AlOH = 54.11: 36.72:
5.94: 0.17.
ECIL: d (ppm) 1.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, CH3, 9H), 3.30 (qd, J = 7.4 Hz,
J = 5.2 Hz, CH2, 6H), and 6.03 (t, J = 51.6 Hz, NH, 1H).
ECIL + HCl: d (ppm) 1.42 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, CH3, 9H), 3.31 (qd,
J = 7.3 Hz, J = 5.2 Hz, CH2, 6H), 4.81 (s), and 5.99 (t, J = 51.6 Hz,
NH, 1H).
2.2.2. Addition of water to BILs
BIL (ca. 10.00 g, precisely weighed) was placed in a Schlenk ves-
sel, and specific molar equivalent of water was added via syringe.
The molar equivalent was defined as mol H2O per mol of N in
the ionic liquid.
2.2.3. Wet composite ionic liquid (Et3NHCl–AlCl3-CuCl, wet CIL)
CIL was synthesized according to patent application
US20040133056A1 [19]: Anhydrous aluminum chloride was
slowly added to a round-bottomed flask containing technical grade
Et3NHCl under atmospheric conditions at 80 °C. After the forma-
tion of chloroaluminate IL (see the procedure for the BILs), cuprous
chloride was introduced. The reaction mixture was stirred at
100 °C for 2 h, until the complete homogenization of the resulting
ionic liquid.
Pyridine: d (ppm) 7.25 (t, J = 1.6 Hz, meta, 2H), 7.66 (t, J = 8.0 Hz,
para, H), and 8.58 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, ortho, 2H).
ECIL + pyridine (extra signals): Lewis acid complex: –CHa–
(d = 8.91 ppm), –CHb– (d = 8.34 ppm), and –CHc– (d = 7.87 ppm),
ratio of Ha:Hb:Hc = 0.77:0.39:0.79 (Fig. 11).
2.2.4. Dry composite ionic liquid (Et3NHCl–AlCl3–CuCl, dry CIL)
The procedure was repeated as for wet CIL using synthesis
grade feedstock and under the protection of nitrogen atmosphere.
Wet CIL + pyridine (extra signals): Pyridinium: –CH –
a
(d = 8.85 ppm), –CHb– (d = 8.15 ppm), –CH – (d = 8.71 ppm), and –
c
NHd (d = 12.79 ppm, t, J = 68.0 Hz), the ratio of H :Hb:H :Hd was
a
c
2.2.5. Evacuated wet CIL (ECIL)
almost at 2:2:1:1 (Fig. 11).
Some typical 1H NMR spectra of BIL and CIL before and after dif-
ferent treatments are shown in Fig. S1. Other NMR spectral data
(all in CD2Cl2 unless indicated otherwise) are given in the results
and discussion part.
Wet CIL was evacuated with a vacuum pump (P < 0.1 mbar) at
50 °C for 12 h with stirring. Lots of bubbles were generated at
the surface of CIL indicating the loss of gas (HCl).
2.2.6. Addition of HCl to ECIL (ECIL + HCl)
Hydrogen chloride was introduced into ECIL (ca. 10 g) via a tube
filled with anhydrous calcium chloride.
2.4. IR analysis
Infrared spectra were recorded in KBr disks by means of a Nico-
let FTIR spectrophotometer. In the glove box, IL samples (0.5 mL)
were put in between the KBr disks and removed from the glove
box immediately prior to measurement. FT-IR spectra were
recorded on a Nicolet 380/FT-IR Nexus infrared spectrometer in
the typical KBr range of the 4000–400 cmꢀ1 at room temperature,
with a resolution of 4 cmꢀ1 in 32 parallel scans.
2.5. Alkylation test with dry, wet CIL and ECIL and product analysis
In a typical experiment, 50 mL of ionic liquid catalyst was
placed in a 250 mL semi-continuous glass autoclave (Fig. 2). An
Fig. 1. Protonation of butene, formation of tert-butyl cation, and alkylation of 2-
butene.