the efficiency of desorption and ionization (e.g., fast atom
bombardment and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization).13-16
These pretreatment processes make it extremely difficult to use
mass spectrometry to continuously monitor the ongoing state of
a chemical reaction under ambient conditions.
Recently, the development of ambient ionization methods [e.g.,
electrospray laser desorption/ionization (ELDI) and desorption
electrospray ionization (DESI)] has made it unnecessary to heat
the sample solution or mix it with a matrix; nevertheless, only
solid samples are suitable for such analysis, meaning that drying
of the sample remains inevitable prior to ionization.17-22 An ideal
approach toward continuously monitoring the stages of ongoing
reaction would be to desorb and ionize the analyte molecules
directly from the solutions without drying the sample. Herein, we
report a modified ELDI techniquesliquid ELDIsthat allows
analyte ions to be generated directly from organic solvents and
aqueous solutions.21-26
In essence, the liquid ELDI technique presented herein is a
combination of two ionization methods: ELDI and surface-assisted
laser desorption/ionization (SALDI) operated under ambient
conditions.20-22,27-30 The possible mechanisms of ELDI and
SALDI have been discussed previously.20,21,27 Recently, the
principle of ELDI has been adapted in several techniques,
including matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization electrospray
ionization and laser ablation electrospray ionization.31-33 In SALDI,
a sample solution is mixed with an “inorganic liquid matrix”
comprising a suspension of micrometer-sized carbon powder in
a mixture of glycerol, sucrose, and methanol.27,28 Because SALDI
is performed under vacuum, the sample solution must be mixed
with a viscous liquid matrix, such as these glycerol/sucrose
solutions, to prevent it from drying in the source. It has been
proposed that, in SALDI, the carbon powder is the energy-transfer
medium coupling the laser UV energy into the molecules in the
viscous liquid solution under vacuum.27,28 For liquid ELDI, the
laser energy is first adsorbed by the fine carbon particles
suspended in the sample solution; the energy is subsequently
transferred to the solvent and the analyte molecules in the sample
solution; the desorbed analyte molecules are then postionized
through ESI processes. In this study, we applied liquid ELDI
combined with mass spectrometry to monitor the progress of
several ongoing chemical and biochemical reactions in different
solution.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Hemin chloride, cytochrome c, trypsin, 1,10-phenanthroline
(PA), nickel chloride, copper sulfate, iron(II) diammonium dis-
ulfate, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and the
organic solvents (HPLC grade) were purchased from Sigma or
Aldrich (Milkaukee, WI) and used without further purification.
Carbon graphite powder was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt,
Germany). The synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles coated with
trypsin has been described previously.34,35
The sample preparation process for liquid ELDI-MS analysis
is extremely simple: merely suspend a small amount of the fine
carbon powder (4 mg/mL) in the sample solution and then subject
it to analysis without any further sample pretreatment. Commonly,
a small amount of the sample solution (5-10 µL) deposited on
an acrylic sample plate [5 (L) × 2 (W) cm] using a micropipet
was sufficient for complete liquid ELDI analysis. The sample plate
was positioned on an acrylic plate placed on a XYZ-stage, which
was set in front of the sampling capillary (inlet) of an ion trap
mass spectrometer. The surface of the sample solution was then
exposed to a pulsed nitrogen laser operated at a wavelength of
337 nm (Physical Science), a frequency of 10 Hz [controlled by a
sweep function generator (model FG-101A, Kowa, Taiwan)], a
pulsed energy of ∼150 µJ, and length of 4 ns. The laser beam
(spot size: ∼100 µm × 150 µm) was focused through an objective
lens. The strongest ion signal (using cytochrome c as the standard
for evaluation) was obtained at an incident laser angle of ∼45°
and a focal length of ∼25 cm.
(11) Fenn, J. B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C. K.; Wong, S. F.; Whitehouse, C. M. Mass
Spectrom. Rev. 1990, 9, 37–70
(12) Coon, J. J.; Harrison, W. W. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5600–5605.
(13) Karas, M.; Hillenkamp, F. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 2299–2301
(14) Tanaka, K. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1988, 2, 151–153
(15) Hillenkamp, F.; Karas, M.; Beavis, R. C.; Chait, B. T. Anal. Chem. 1991,
63, 1193A–1203A
(16) Barber, M.; Bordoli, R. S.; Sedgwick, R. D.; Tyler, A. N. Nature 1981,
293, 270–275
(17) Takats, Z.; Wiseman, J. M.; Gologan, B.; Cooks, R. G. Science 2004, 306,
471–473
(18) Wiseman, J. M.; Puolitaival, S. M.; Takats, Z.; Cooks, R. G.; Caprioli, R. M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7094–7097
(19) Cooks, R. G.; Ouyang, Z.; Takats, Z.; Wiseman, J. M. Science 2006, 311,
1566–1570
(20) Shiea, J.; Huang, M.-Z.; Hsu, H.-J.; Lee, C.-Y.; Yuan, C.-Y.; Beech, I.; Sunner,
J. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 19, 3701–3704
(21) Huang, M. Z.; Hsu, H. J.; Lee, J.; Jeng, J.; Shiea, J. J. Proteome Res. 2006,
5, 1107–1116
(22) Huang, M. Z.; Hsu, H. J.; Wu, C. I.; Lin, S. Y.; Ma, Y. L.; Cheng, T. L.;
Shiea, J. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 21, 1767–1775
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The configuration of the ESI source for liquid ELDI was similar
to those used in solid ELDI, pyrolysis/ESI, and fused-droplet ESI
sources.20-22,36-39 The capillary electrosprayer was aligned paral-
lel to, and ∼3.5 mm above, the acrylic sample plate. The ESI plume
was directed toward the ion sampling orifice of the mass analyzer
(i.e., parallel to the sample plate). The electrospray needle and
the sample plate potentials were both held at 0 V (grounded);
.
(23) Shiea, J.; Yuan, C. H.; Huang, M. Z. 5th HUPO Annual World Conference,
Long Beach, CA, Oct. 28-Nov. 1, 2006; Poster W199.
(24) Yuan, C. H.; Hung, W. C.; Chang, H. C.; Lin, H. Y.; Liu, J. J.; Shiea, J. 5th
HUPO Annual World Conference, Long Beach, CA, Oct. 28-Nov. 1, 2006;
Poster W 203.
(25) Jeng, J.; Yuan, C. H.; Cheng C. Y.; J. Shiea. 55th ASMS Conference on
Mass Spectrometry, Indianapolis, IN, June 3-7, 2007; Poster TPA 10.
(26) Yuan, C. H.; Ma, Y. L.; Shiea, J. 55th ASMS Conference on Mass
Spectrometry, Indianapolis, IN, June 3-7, 2007; Poster TPA 18.
(34) Jeng, J.; Lin, M.; Cheng, F.; Yeh, C.; Shiea, J. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
(27) Sunner, J.; Dratz, E.; Chen, Y. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 4335–4342
(28) Kraft, P.; Alimpiev, S.; Dratz, E.; Sunner, J. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998,
9, 912–924
(29) Chen, Y.; Shiea, J.; Sunner, J. J. Chromatogr., A 1998, 826, 77–86
(30) Han, M.; Sunner, J. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 11, 644–649
(31) Sampson, J. S.; Hawkridge, A. M.; Muddiman, D. C. J. Am. Soc. Mass
Spectrom. 2006, 17, 1712–1716
(32) Sampson, J. S.; Hawkridge, A. M.; Muddiman, D. C. Rapid Commun. Mass
Spectrom. 2007, 21, 1150–1154
(33) Nemes, P.; Vertes, A. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 8098–8106
.
2007, 21, 3060–3068
(35) Chang, F.; Yang, Y.; Huang, W.; Yeh, C.; Tsai, C.; Wu, C.; Shieh, D.
Biomaterials 2005, 26, 729–738
(36) Hsu, H. J.; Kuo, T. L.; Wu, S. H.; Oung, J. N.; Shiea, J. Anal. Chem. 2005,
77, 7744–7749
(37) Shiea, J.; Wang, C. H. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 32, 247–250
(38) Shiea, J.; Chang, D. Y.; Lin, C. H.; Jiang, S. J. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 4983–
4987
(39) Shiea, J.; Lee, C. C.; Chang, D. Y.; Jeng, J. J. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 37,
115–117
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7700 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 80, No. 20, October 15, 2008