916
D.T. Smith et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 40 (2005) 908–917
3
cular injection (0.1 cm sodium pentobarbital, 50 mg/ml). At
the end of the study, while the animals were under anesthe-
sia, the guinea pigs were euthanized by increasing the anes-
thetic dose significantly, followed by perfusion/fixation (glu-
taraldehyde in phosphate buffered Ringer’s solution).
pass the tube. The feeding needle is advanced between the
incisors and the beginning of the molars, which initiates a
swallowing or gag reflex, facilitating advancement of the feed-
ing needle to the stomach. Prior to this operation, the correct
needle (sized relative to the size of the guinea pig) is marked
by placing its end adjacent the animal’s last rib and marking
the proximal portion of the needle near the tip of the nose.
This provides an estimate of the required length to advance
to the stomach during gavage. The needle can be connected
to either a syringe or an aspirator allowing material to be intro-
duced into, or withdrawn from, the stomach.
7.2.4. SSEPs
It is the loss of nerve impulse conduction through the white
catastrophic deficits in behavior observed in SCI [1]. These
volleys of compound nerve impulses ascending and descend-
ing the spinal cord are associated with numerous axons and
synapses, and are referred to as EPs when stimulated syn-
chronously by electrical activation of a compound nerve of
the lower or upper limbs (in the SSEP) or activation of the
cortex (during motor EP recording, or MEPs, not performed
here). This form of stimulation of largely ascending impulses
and then recording them at the contralateral sensorimotor cor-
tex of the brain is referred to as SSEP testing.
Stimulation of the tibial nerve of the hind limb was accom-
plished using a pair of needle electrodes inserted near the
nerve at the popliteal notch of the knee. Similar SSEPs were
evoked by stimulation of the median nerve of the forelimb
with pair of stimulation electrodes. Recording electrodes were
located in the scalp covering the contralateral cortex region,
with an indifferent electrode usually located in the pinna of
the ear.
A complete electrical record for one period of investiga-
tion involved stimulating the nerve 200 times in a train (2 mA
square wave, 200 µs duration at 3 Hz). Three to four sets of
these records were then averaged to produce a single wave-
form for quantitative study. Recording and stimulation used
a Nihon Kohden Neuropak 4 and a Power Mac G-3 com-
puter.
Quantitative evaluation involved measurements of latency
from the initiation of stimulation (noted by the stimulus arti-
fact) to the initiation of the EP, however, the most reliable
and informative comparative data involved a determination
of the area beneath the EP in pixels using IPLab™ spectrum
software (Scanalytics, Farifax, VA). These areas beneath the
peak waveform (that is above baseline) were normalized by
dividing the post injury (or post treatment) EP by the area of
the initial EP recorded in the normal animal. If all (100%)
nerve fibers normally fired in synchrony by the stimulation
regimen before injury were theoretically recruited into con-
duction after a treatment, the average SSEPs should thus reach
unity (1.0).
A starting dosage for guinea pigs was estimated by work-
gia in dogs (0.5–1.0 mg/kg body weight) [24]. In the case of
an approximately 500 g guinea pig, this would result in a
total dosage of about 0.25 mg. A stock solution for gavage
3
was prepared where 0.2 cm of an aqueous solution con-
tained 0.2 mg of drug. This allowed the relative standardiza-
tion of total concentration given to animals, and was facili-
tated by the lack of significant variation in their weights (for
the 10 animals that were tested with 4-AP the mean weight
was 421.5 ± 20.9 g; for methyl carbamate 9 the mean weight
was 411.6 ± 23 g; P ≥ 0.5). The effective dosage for 4-AP
was sufficient to produce an improvement in the electrophysi-
ological record equal to 0.47 ± 0.04 mg/kg. By comparison,
the effective dosage for ethyl carbamate 10 appeared to be
slightly lower (0.37 ± 0.2 mg/kg) but this difference was not
statistically different given the small sample size (P ≥ 0.05).
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the expert technical aid of Debra Bohnert,
Brent Dawson andAliciaAltheizer. This work was supported
by financial support of the Center for Paralysis Research from
the State of Indiana.
References
[
1] R.B. Borgens, Restoring Function to the Injured Human Spinal Cord
Monograph), Springer-Verlag, Heidelburg, 2003.
(
[2] I. Wickelgren, Science 297 (2002) 178.
[3] C.M. Armstrong, A. Loboda, Biophys. J. 81 (2001) 895.
[
[
[
4] M. Crest, E. Beraud-Juven, M. Gola, Perspect. Drug Discov. Des.
5–16 (1999) 333.
5] F.S.P. Chen, D. Fedida, Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 15–16 (1999)
27.
6] T. Baukrowitz, G. Yellen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996)
13357.
1
2
7
.2.5. Drug administration
Drugs were administered by gavage using the following
[7] A.P. Southan, D.G. Owen, Br. J. Pharmacol. 122 (1997) 335.
[
8] K.M. Giangiacomo, J. Gabriel, V. Fremont, T.J. Mullmann, Perspect.
Drug Discov. Des. 15–16 (1999) 167.
methods. All tested drugs were introduced, in solution form,
into the guinea pig stomach using a round tipped feeding
needle (either 18 gauge, 55 mm length or 16 gauge, 75 mm
length; Fine Science Tools). Gavage is only carried out on
the sedated animal. In guinea pigs, the soft palate is continu-
ous with the base of the tongue with only a small opening to
[
[
9] A.R. Blight, J.A. Gruner, J. Neurol. Sci. 82 (1987) 145.
10] R.R. Hansebout, A.R. Blight, S. Fawcett, K. Reddy, J. Neurotrauma
1
0 (1993) 19.
[
11] P.J. Potter, K.C. Hayes, J.T.C. Hsieh, G.A. Delaney, J.L. Segal, Spinal
Cord 36 (1998) 147–155.