Changes in patterns of cytokines in relapsing and remitting MS
P Mara da Costa et al
297
Although many interesting type
1
or type
2
of EAE in murines. Further support for this protective
role of IFNg during the pathogenesis of EAE has come
from studies showing that mice with disrupted IFNg
gene are susceptible to the induction of the disease.29
The characteristic cytokine products of Th1 and
Th2 are mutually inhibitory for the differentiation and
effector function of the reciprocal phenotype. IFNg has
been shown to prevent Th2 cell proliferation, whereas
IL-10 profoundly inhibits the synthesis of Th1
cytokines.30 ± 32 TGFb has been described as a Th3
cytokine33 and its effects on suppressing EAE have also
been demonstrated.10 The present study has shown
that in the active phase of the disease there is a
decrease in the level of IL-10 when cells are stimulated
with PHA, whereas no differences in TGFb levels were
found, despite previous suggestions to the contrary
published in the literature. Patients with stable forms
of the disease revealed no differences in the produc-
tion of IL-10 and TGFb when stimulated under similar
conditions. Patients with stable forms of the disease,
however, were found to reveal increases in the
production of IL-10 and TGFb when stimulated with
MBP.34
responses have been observed in autoimmune dis-
eases, a careful consideration of anatomical location
and the kinetics of a response can provide more
de®nitive data. Moreover, many immune responses
may remain localized so that sampling of peripheral
blood lymphocytes may provide information about
potential responses, whereas sampling of CSF or brain
tissue represents an ongoing response. Peripheral
blood was selected for investigation of the cytokines
patterns here since MS involves both a localized
immune response in the CNS and various immune
abnormalities correlated with disease activity in the
peripheral immune compartment.22
Proin¯ammatory cytokines such as TNFa and IFNg
are associated with disease activity in both MS
patients and the experimental model of Experimental
Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE).6,7 Since TNFa
is a major inducer of endothelial adhesion molecules
and chemokines, it can be predicted that it will have a
major effect on the recruitment of lymphocytes by the
central nervous system.23 A recent study describes the
spontaneous development of a chronic in¯ammatory
demyelinating disease in transgenic mice that consti-
Myelin basic protein seems to have stimulated the
production of anti-in¯ammatory cytokines in the cells
from patients with stable MS; the production of anti-
in¯ammatory cytokines by T cell clones from MS
patients sensitized to PLP has also been observed34,35
The mechanisms for stimulation of the increased
production of anti-in¯ammatory cytokines while in-
hibiting that of pro-in¯ammatory ones by neuroanti-
gens such as MBP are not well understood. In the
Lewis rat model, administration of myelin basic
protein has been shown to be an effective means of
suppressing EAE, an effect mediated by the TGFb,
secreted by T-cells from orally tolerized animals after
being triggered by the oral tolerogen. We previously
demonstrated that suppressor determinants exist on
the MBP molecule, since T cells from animals fed with
21 ± 40 peptide secreted TGFb, whereas no TGFb was
released in animals fed with MBP encephalitogenic
determinant (71 ± 90).36 It is possible that suppressive
determinants present on the MBP molecule stimulate
the production of anti-in¯ammatory cytokines (IL-10
and TGFb) by MBP-speci®c T cells from patients with
stable MS. The increased levels of anti-in¯ammatory
cytokines, on the other hand, may inhibit the
production of pro-in¯ammatory cytokines such as IFNg,
as seen in this study.
tutively have
a dysregulate murine TNFa gene.
Transgenic expression was restricted to the central
nervous system, and the direct involvement of TNFa
in the pathogenesis of the disease was con®rmed by
peripheral administration of neutralizing murine TNFa
antibodies.24 The present study showed that in vitro
LPS stimulation of peripheral blood cells from patients
with active MS led to a moderate increase in TNFa
production; this is in agreement with several authors
who revealed an increase in TNFa in patients with
active MS.23,24 The stimulation of lymphocytes using
PHA, however, did not induce a signi®cant difference
in TNFa production for the individuals in the groups
studied.
No increase in IFNg production in the active form of
the disease was induced by MBP stimulation nor by
polyclonal activation with PHA. These results are in
contrast to previous studies,25,26 where the authors
found an increase in the levels of this cytokine. On the
other hand, the data found here are in agreement with
previous observations which found no signi®cant
increase in IFNg levels during the active phase of
disease. There was, indeed, a signi®cant reduction in
level of IFNg observed in patients with a stable form of
the disease when the cells were stimulated with MBP.
Until recently, observations pointed to a critical role
for IFNg in the pathogenesis of MS and in the EAE
model, although recent data using a variety of systemic
and CNS-localized manipulations of IFNg production
have led to the questioning of the overall importance
of this cytokine in disease initiation and progression.
A number of investigations have shown that systemic
administration of neutralizing IFNg antibodies leads to
exacerbation of the disease in both susceptible and
resistant strains of mice, rather than the amelioration
of clinical signs.27,28 In addition, the in vivo adminis-
tration of IFNg has been found to decrease the severity
The results of stimulation of the cells of patients
with the active form of the disease suggest a reduction
in clones producing anti-in¯ammatory cytokines in the
peripheral blood since even stimulation with poly-
clonal mitogens such as PHA was not capable of
simulating the production of signi®cant levels of these
cytokines.
Thus, in autoimmune diseases, type
1 and 2
cytokines may polarize forms of the speci®c immune
response that result from the combined action of
genetic and environmental conditions. Consequently,
inhibiting mechanisms such as the production of anti-
Multiple Sclerosis