5066
A. Napolitano et al. / Tetrahedron 58 ꢀ2002) 5061±5067
Helium was the carrier gas. CI±MSmeasurements were
carried out using methane as the reagent gas. Data were
processed using G1701AA data analysis software. The
temperature program of the column was as follows: at
hexane) 308 nm; FT-IR ꢀCHCl ) n
3
1635, 1571, 1499,
max
2
1
1
1354 cm ; H NMR ꢀ400 MHz, CDCl ) 1.69 ꢀ2.4 H, d,
3
J7.6, 0.8 Hz), 1.76 ꢀ0.6 H, d, J7.6, 0.8 Hz), 3.53 ꢀ1.6
H, dd, J6.4 Hz), 3.62 ꢀ0.4 H, d, J6.4 Hz) 5.41 ꢀ1H, m),
1
5.75 ꢀ1H, m); C NMR ꢀ100 MHz, CDCl ) 18.6, 27.0,
3
4
08C, hold time1 min; from 40 to 2808C, rate58C/min;
3
1
109.4, 120.3, 133.2, 159.0; EI MS m/z 185 ꢀM , 40), 139
hold at 2608C for 11 min. The injector and detector were
taken at 220 and 2508C, respectively. The acquisition started
ꢀM2NO , 72), 97 ꢀM2NO ±C H , 100); HR MScalc for
6
2
2
3
5
min after the injection ꢀsolvent delay 5 min), and was set
C H N O 185.1404, found m/z 185.1415.
6 7 3 4
in scan mode in the range 43±550 amu. The EI spectra were
obtained at 70 eV. For CI spectra the source and quadrupole
were taken at 200 and 1008C, respectively, and a mass range
4.4. Isolation of 17/18 and formation from putative
precursors
4
0±600 amu was chosen.
Fraction III ꢀ40 mg) obtained from the reaction mixture of
ethyl linoleate with NaNO was puri®ed by preparative TLC
UV and IR spectra were performed using a diode array and a
1
13
15
2
FT-IR spectrophotometer, respectively. H, C, N NMR
spectra were recorded at 400.1, 100.6 and 40.5 MHz, in that
order using a Bruker DRX-400 MHz instrument ®tted with a
ꢀ
ꢀ
cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 90:10) to yield a yellow band
10 mg) which was subjected to further fractionation ꢀcyclo-
hexane/ethyl acetate 95:5) to afford 17/18 ꢀ5 mg). UV l
1
max
5 mm H/broadband gradient probe with inverse geometry.
Standard Bruker implementations of gradient-selected
1
2
4
81, 383 nm; H NMR ꢀCDCl ) ꢀsee Fig. 6); NICI MS R
3 t
6.50 min, m/z 370.
1
versions of inverse ꢀ H detected) heteronuclear multiple
quantum coherence ꢀHMQC) and heteronuclear multiple
bond correlation ꢀHMBC) experiments were used. The
HMBC experiments used a 100 ms long-range coupling
delay. Samples analysed by NMR spectroscopy were
ꢀ9E,11E)-13-Hydroperoxy-9-nitrooctadecadienoic acid ꢀ21)
was prepared as previously described. ꢀ9Z,11E, 13S)-13-
16
hydroperoxyoctadeca-9,11-dienoic acid was obtained by
lipoxidase oxidation as described and puri®ed by prepara-
23
dissolved in CDCl . Chemical shifts are recorded in d
3
tive TLC ꢀcyclohexane/ethyl acetate 7:3). The isolated
product was exposed to FeꢀII)/H O in 0.1 M phosphate
buffer to give ꢀ9Z,11E)-13-oxo-9,11-octadecadienoic
1
values ꢀppm) down®eld from tetramethylsilane ꢀ H and
1
3
15
C NMR) or with reference to [ N]urea in DMSO at
2
2
7
ꢀ
6.97 ppm, relative to NH ꢀliquid, 298 K) at 0.0 ppm
3
17
acid as the main product which was isolated by preparative
TLC ꢀcyclohexane/ethyl acetate 7/:3). Purity of the
1
5
22
N NMR). Analytical and preparative TLC analyses
were performed on F254 0.25 and 0.5 mm silica gel and
high performance ꢀHPTLC) plates from Merck. Griess
reagent ꢀ1% sulphanylamide and 0.1% naphthylethylene-
diamine in 5% phosphoric acid), potassium dichromate in
20% sulphuric acid and iodine were used for product detec-
tion on TLC plates.
1
compound was checked by NMR analysis: H NMR
ꢀCDCl ) d ꢀppm) ꢀselected resonances): 0.89 ꢀ3H, m)
3
1.29±1.63 ꢀ16H, m), 2.28 ꢀ4H, m), 2.56 ꢀ2H, t,
J7.2 Hz), 5.88 ꢀ1H, m), 6.09±6.18 ꢀ2H, m), 7.49 ꢀ1H,
dd, J14.2, 12 Hz).
Compound 21 or ꢀ9Z,11E,13S)-13-hydroperoxyoctadeca-
9,11-dienoic acid or ꢀ9Z,11E)-13-oxo-9,11-octadecadienoic
1
5
4
.2. Reaction of linoleic acid ethyl ester with [ N]NaNO
2
acid were exposed separately to nitrite in 1% sulphuric acid
as detailed above. Periodically, aliquots of the reaction
mixture were extracted with ethyl acetate and analysed by
TLC ꢀcyclohexane/ethyl acetate 7:3) and H NMR. In other
experiments 21 ꢀ0.5 mM) was exposed to ironꢀII) ions
To linoleic acid ethyl ester ꢀ462 mg, 1.5 mmol) in 1% sul-
1
5
furic acid ꢀ20 mL) [ N]labelled or unlabelled sodium nitrite
420 mg, 6.0 mmol) was added while the mixture was taken
ꢀ
1
under vigorous stirring in a stoppered round-bottom ¯ask at
room temperature. After 3 h, the mixture was extracted with
cyclohexane ꢀ3£10 mL) and the combined organic layers
washed with brine and dried over sodium sulfate to afford
a yellow residue. Fractionation of the resulting residue on
PTLC using cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 95:5 as the eluant
ꢀ
1
0.2 M equiv.) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer ꢀpH 7.4). After
0 h, the reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate
and analysed as above.
afforded four main fractions. The R 0.7 fraction ꢀ200 mg)
f
Acknowledgements
consisted of the starting material and was not further
analysed. Fractions at R 0.45±0.60 ꢀ55 mg, fraction I), Rf
f
This work was ®nancially supported by MURST ꢀPRIN
001) and Ministry of Health ꢀRome). We thank the ªCentro
Interdipartimentale di Metodologie Chimico±Fisiche of
Naples Universityº for NMR facilities. GC±MSfacilities
were available at Istituto Dermatologico S. Gallicano
0.35±0.40 ꢀ32 mg, fraction II) and R 0.15±0.30 ꢀ40 mg,
f
fraction III) were subjected to NMR and GC analysis.
2
4
.3. Reaction of 1,4-hexadiene with nitrite
ꢀRome).
To 1,4-hexadiene ꢀ304 mg, 3.7 mmol) in 1% sulfuric acid
20 mL) sodium nitrite ꢀ1.28 g, 18.5 mmol) was added and
ꢀ
the mixture was taken under vigorous stirring in a stoppered
round-bottom ¯ask at room temperature overnight. The
mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate and the residue
obtained ꢀ151 mg) was fractionated by preparative TLC
using cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 7:3 to give a main band
References
1. O'Donnell, V. B.; Eiserich, J. P.; Chumley, P. H.; Jablonsky,
M. J.; Krishna, N. R.; Kirk, M.; Barnes, S.; Darley-Usmar,
V. M.; Freeman, B. A. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1999, 12, 83±92.
ꢀ
25 mg, 4% yield) consisting of pure 20. UV lmax ꢀcyclo-