ChemComm
Communication
HOMO ꢀ 1 is located strictly at the platinum and the LUMO + 1 can
10
be clearly assigned to the diborane(4) (ESI,† Fig. S4). The WBIs give
no indication of a Pt–B bond (0.005, 0.0018), instead the values for
the Pt–P bond increase (0.6289, 0.6278). The evaluation and com-
parison of the frontier orbitals of the diboranes(4) B (OMe)4
2
2 2
and B Cat in the starting materials, and the diborane(4) parts
in the transition states, reveal no electronic differences between
the compounds. The similar activation energies 1ADD - 1TS
ꢀ1
ꢀ1
(
18.60 kJ mol ) and 4ADD - 4TS (16.54 kJ mol ) suggest no
steric advantage for any reaction.
The synthesis of the cis-bis(boryl) platinum(II) complexes cis-
[
(Cy P) Pt{B(OMe) } ] (1) by oxidative addition of the B–B bond
3 2 2 2
of B (OMe) at low temperatures to the platinum(0) precursor
2
4
[Pt(PCy
3
)
2
] is reported herein. Full characterisation of the title
compound in solution and using X-ray diffraction revealed no
unusual structural features, but nevertheless 1 constitutes a
unique system as liberation of B (OMe) occurs under mild
2 4
conditions from the isolated complex. Thus, the square-planar,
four-coordinate complex 1 undergoes reductive elimination of a
diborane(4) in the absence of any supporting substrate – a
process that in the case of Pt(II) is believed to proceed exclusively
ꢀ
1
Fig. 4 Calculated parameters (DGTotal in kJ mol ) for the formation of the cis- via six-coordinate intermediates. Preliminary DFT studies revealed
bis(boryl) platinum complexes 1CAL and 4CAL and the transition states 1TS and 4TS
only a very small thermodynamic driving force for the oxidative
and the pre-configured adducts 1ADD and 4ADD
.
addition of B
tion for the observation of this unusual equilibrium facilitated by
] with the formation of the corre- oxidative addition and reductive elimination processes.
sponding cis-configured complex is an exergonic process (Fig. 4)
2 4 3 2
(OMe) to [Pt(PCy ) ], thus suggesting an explana-
3 2
the B–B bond to [Pt(PCy )
ꢀ1
Notes and references
for both B Cat (by ꢀ85.96 kJ mol ; all energies are corrected
2
2
1
0
ꢀ1
Gibbs free energies) and for B
2
(OMe)
4
(by ꢀ8.90 kJ mol ).
1
(a) I. Beletskaya and A. Pelter, Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 4957;
(b) J. H. Brewster and E. Negishi, Science, 1980, 207, 44.
However, formation of the catecholato derivative 4CAL is signifi-
ꢀ1
2 (a) I. A. I. Mkhalid, J. H. Barnard, T. B. Marder, J. M. Murphy and
J. F. Hartwig, Chem. Rev., 2009, 110, 890; (b) J. F. Hartwig, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2011, 40, 1992.
cantly (by 77.06 kJ mol ) more favourable than that of the
methoxy derivative 1CAL. We were also able to locate the transi-
tion states 1TS and 4TS of both reaction paths. The two transition
states are markedly different. While 1TS is more comparable to
the product structure, the geometry of 4TS is more similar to that
of the starting materials. These findings are in accordance with
3 T. B. Marder and N. C. Norman, Top. Catal., 1998, 5, 63.
4
(a) A. Kerr, N. C. Norman, A. G. Orpen, M. J. Quayle, C. R. Rice,
P. L. Timms, G. R. Whittell and T. B. Marder, Chem. Commun., 1998,
319; (b) D. Curtis, M. J. G. Lesley, N. C. Norman, A. G. Orpen and
J. Starbuck, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 1687; (c) H. Braunschweig,
R. Bertermann, P. Brenner, M. Burzler, R. D. Dewhurst, K. Radacki and
F. Seeler, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 11828; (d) H. Braunschweig,
P. Brenner, R. D. Dewhurst, F. Guethlein, J. O. C. Jimenez-Halla,
K. Radacki, J. Wolf and L. Z o¨ llner, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 8605;
1
1
the Hammond-Postulate for early and late transition states.
This is also reflected by the geometry of 1TS, in which the
diborane(4) ligand is in a parallel orientation to the P–Pt–P-axis,
whereas in 4TS the diborane(4) ligand is in a perpendicular
orientation to this axis.
The reverse reactions of 1CAL and 4CAL through reductive
elimination of the diborane(4) ligand need to overcome quite
different activation barriers: 58.58 kJ mol for 4CAL and just
1.85 kJ mol for 1CAL, which further explains the equilibrium
of 1. In both reaction paths we found pre-configured adduct
formation of the platinum precursor and the diborane(4), which
(e) N. Lu, N. C. Norman, A. G. Orpen, M. J. Quayle, P. L. Timms and
G. R. Whittell, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2000, 4032; ( f ) G. J. Irvine,
M. J. G. Lesley, T. B. Marder, N. C. Norman, C. R. Rice, E. G. Robins,
W. R. Roper, G. R. Whittell and L. J. Wright, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 2685;
(
g) H. Braunschweig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 1786.
(a) H. Braunschweig, C. Kollann and D. Rais, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2006, 45, 5254; (b) H. Braunschweig, R. D. Dewhurst and
5
ꢀ
1
ꢀ
1
1
A. Schneider, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3924; (c) H. Braunschweig,
P. Brenner, A. M u¨ ller, K. Radacki, D. Rais and K. Uttinger,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2007, 13, 7171.
6
7
(a) H. Braunschweig, A. Damme and T. Kupfer, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2011, 50, 7179; (b) H. Braunschweig, A. Damme and T. Kupfer,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 15927; (c) H. Braunschweig, A. Damme,
R. D. Dewhurst and A. Vargas, Nat. Chem., 2013, 5, 115.
(a) L. Dang, Z. Lin and T. B. Marder, Chem. Commun., 2009, 3987;
(b) J. Zhu, Z. Lin and T. B. Marder, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 9384;
(c) K. C. Lam, W. H. Lam, Z. Lin, T. B. Marder and N. C. Norman,
Inorg. Chem., 2004, 43, 2541.
ꢀ
1
was preferred over the separated precursors by ꢀ15.65 kJ mol for
ꢀ
1
1ADD and ꢀ43.92 kJ mol
for 4ADD. NBO calculations were
0
0
performed for the compounds 1 ADD and 4 ADD, which are derived
from the optimized adducts by exchange of PCy with PMe ligands,
3
3
0
using fixed geometry. In 4
we observe a bonding interaction
ADD
between the platinum centre and the unoccupied bonding p-orbital
of B Cat
in the LUMO + 1, while the HOMO ꢀ 1 represents the B–B
bonding interaction. This is reflected by the Wiberg bond indices
WBI) for the Pt1–B1 (0.3171) and Pt1–B2 (0.3486) bonds compared
8
9
G. Lesley, P. Nguyen, N. J. Taylor, T. B. Marder, A. J. Scott, W. Clegg
and N. C. Norman, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 5137.
C. N. Iverson and M. R. Smith, Organometallics, 1996, 15, 5155.
2
2
1
1
0 Experimental and theoretical details are provided in the ESI†.
1 (a) G. S. J. Hammond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1955, 77, 334;
(b) J. E. Leffler, Science, 1953, 117, 340.
(
0
to the platinum–phosphorus bonds (0.4938, 0.5167). For 1 ADD the
5
218 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 5216--5218
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013