ChemComm
of 12–15 V nm obviously helps activate the reactants of CO/O
Communication
À1
2
in enhanced electromagnetic fields of incident light. This LSPR-
+
and enhances the oxidation process on small gold crystals induced ENFE can intensify the PEF of Na in zeolites, enabling
1
2
(
20–30 nm). The reported mechanism of acetalisation demon- the intensified PEF to stretch the CQO bond of reactants to
strates that the metal ions of zeolites break the CQO bond first facilitate their breakage, thus accelerating the reaction rate.
1
3
to initiate the reaction. Moreover, density-function-theory Moreover, reactants with a larger molecular polarity convert
(
DFT) calculations confirmed that the extra electric field much faster because of the stronger interaction between the
À1
(0–12 V nm ) could stretch the CQO bond of aromatic aldehydes, reactant and the intensified PEF. Further studies on exchanged
but did not affect the methanol molecules (ESI,† Section S4). The zeolites of other ions and tuneable sizes of Au-NPs should
strength of the extra electric field employed in DFT calculations is be conducted. This cascade enhancement effect from electro-
+
À1 14
on the same order of the PEF strength of Na in NaY (6.2 V nm ).
magnetic fields of visible light to electrostatic fields of zeolite
+
Therefore, it becomes convincing that the PEF of Na should be extraframe cations may have extensive applications in adsorp-
directly intensified by the LSPR-induced ENFE, so that the tion, separation, and catalysis.
intensified PEF can stretch the CQO bond of aldehydes to boost
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from
the reaction rate. Aldehydes with larger molecular polarities can the Australia Research Council. X. Ke is indebted to QUT and the
interact more strongly with the intensified PEF, thereby showing Queensland State Government for a Smart Futures Fellowship.
higher conversions (Fig. S5, ESI†).
Light intensity and wavelength also have an influence on the Notes and references
catalytic consequences. Fig. 2a illustrates the correlation between
1
(a) M. Choi, K. Na, J. Kim, Y. Sakamoto, O. Terasaki and R. Ryoo,
Nature, 2009, 461, 246–249; (b) K. Na, C. Jo, J. Kim, K. Cho, J. Jung,
Y. Seo, R. J. Messinger, B. F. Chmelka and R. Ryoo, Science, 2011,
measured catalytic conversions as the function of light intensity.
A linear increase in the conversion with the light intensity was
observed on Au/NaY, whereas no apparent change in conversion
was observed on NaY. This linear dependence indicated that the
photo-excited Au-NPs were responsible for the observed increase
in the catalytic activity, because stronger light intensity resulted in
more intensive ENFE–PEF interaction to improve the reaction.
In addition, the range of wavelength also affected the catalytic
performance (Fig. 2b, glass filters were used to remove photons
with wavelengths below the filter threshold). The conversion on
Au/NaY declined gradually when the light source with longer cut-off
wavelengths was used, keeping the light intensity (after filter)
constant. However, the wavelength change did not affect the
catalytic activity of NaY. All these results demonstrated that
photo-excited Au-NPs made essential contribution to the boosting
of the reaction.
3
33, 328–332; (c) X. Zhang, D. Liu, D. Xu, S. Asahina, K. A. Cychosz,
K. V. Agrawal, Y. A. Wahedi, A. Bhan, S. A. Hashimi, O. Terasaki,
M. Thommes and M. Tsapatsis, Science, 2012, 336, 1684–1687;
(d) X. B. Ke, X. G. Zhang, H. W. Liu, S. Xue and H. Y. Zhu, Chem.
Commun., 2013, 49, 9866–9868.
2
(a) H. Kisch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 812–847; (b) Y. Qu and
X. Duan, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 2568–2580.
3 (a) Z. Y. Wu, H. J. Wang, L. L. Ma, J. Xue and J. H. Zhu, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater., 2008, 109, 436–444; (b) M. M. Mohamed, F. I. Zidan
and M. Thabet, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2008, 108, 193–203;
(c) A. Fujishima and K. Honder, Nature, 1972, 238, 37–38.
4 (a) H. Sun, F. Blatter and H. Frei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
6
1
873–6879; (b) F. Blatter and H. Frei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
812–1820; (c) H. Frei, Science, 2006, 313, 309–310; (d) Y. Xiang,
S. C. Larsen and V. H. Grassian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 5063–5072.
5 (a) A. K. Aboul-Gheit, S. M. Ahmed and S. A. Hanafy, J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem., 2008, 288, 52–57; (b) P. K. Dutta and M. Severance, J. Phys.
Chem. Lett., 2011, 2, 467–476.
6
(a) S. Linic, P. Christopher, H. Xin and A. Marimuthu, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2013, 46, 1890–1899; (b) S. Linic, P. Christopher and
D. B. Ingram, Nat. Mater., 2011, 10, 911–921; (c) L. Q. Liu,
S. X. Ouyang and J. H. Ye, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52,
The acetalisation of aromatic aldehydes with methanol can
be significantly enhanced by supported Au-NPs on NaY under
visible light irradiation, and the catalytic activity is directly
correlated with the molecular polarity of aldehydes. Au-NPs
exhibit the LSPR effect upon visible light irradiation, resulting
6689–6693; (d) W. B. Hou and S. B. Cronin, Adv. Funct. Mater.,
2013, 23, 1612–1619.
M. D. Xiao, R. B. Jiang, F. Wang, C. H. Fang, J. F. Wang and J. C. Yu,
J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 5790–5805.
(a) K. L. Wustholz, A.-I. Henry, J. M. McMahon, R. G. Freeman,
N. Valley, M. E. Piotti, M. J. Natan, G. C. Schatz and R. P. Van Duyne,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 10903–10910; (b) N. Large, M. Abb,
J. Aizpurua and O. L. Muskens, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 1741–1746.
(a) X. B. Xu, K. Kim, H. F. Li and D. L. Fan, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24,
7
8
9
5
457–5463; (b) L. Tang, S. K. Kocabas, S. Latif, A. K. Okyay, D.-S.
Ly-Gagnon, K. C. Saraswat and D. A. B. Miller, Nat. Photonics, 2008,
, 226–229; (c) W. J. Liu, Z. N. Zhu, K. Deng, Z. T. Li, Y. L. Zhou,
H. B. Qiu, Y. Gao, S. Che and Z. Y. Tang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135,
2
9
2
659–9664; (d) Q. Q. Gan, F. J. Bartoli and Z. H. Kafafi, Adv. Mater.,
013, 25, 2385–2396.
1
0 (a) X. G. Zhang, X. B. Ke and H. Y. Zhu, Chem. – Eur. J., 2012, 18,
8
2
048–8056; (b) X. G. Zhang, X. B. Ke, A. J. Du and H. Y. Zhu, Sci. Rep.,
014, 4, 3805.
1
1
1
1 H. Cho, H. Park, T. P. Russell and S. Park, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20,
047–5051.
2 T. B ¨a r, T. Visart de Bocarm ´e , B. E. Nieuwenhuys and N. Kruse, Catal.
Lett., 2001, 74, 127–131.
3 B. Thomas, S. Prathapan and S. Sugunan, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater., 2005, 80, 65–72.
Fig. 2 The conversion of the acetalisation between 2-methoxy benzalde-
hyde and methanol varies as the function of light intensity (a), and cut-off
wavelength (b) (e.g. 400 nm means the light wavelength o400 nm is cut
off). Reaction conditions: 2-methoxy benzaldehyde 0.2 g, methanol 10 g,
catalyst 0.025 g, atmosphere air, temperature 60 1C, and time 6 h. The
5
selectivity towards diacetal was excellent (499%) under all these reaction 14 J. A. Dunne, M. Rao, S. Sircar, R. J. Gorte and A. L. Myers, Langmuir,
conditions.
1996, 12, 5896–5904.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 13893--13895 | 13895