Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
pubs.acs.org/joc
Article
selectivity.19 Unfortunately, the only product isolated in low
yield (35%) was the disaccharide 9 which had the desired α-
(1,3)-linkage but had lost the 4-methoxybenzyl (PMB) group
at C2. Due to this unexpected result the reaction was
reattempted using the donor 10 which was previously
employed by Xia et al.16 (Scheme 1), to synthesize both O-
and S-linked isoglobotrihexosylceramides. However, in our
hands only the disaccharide 11 was obtained in a low yield
(38%), again with loss of the PMB group. Due to this result
another donor was sourced.
22. Protection of the C2 and C4 hydroxy groups with armed
non-participating benzyl groups28 yielded the allyl ether 23.
Removal of the allyl glycoside using a Pd(II)-mediated
deprotection17 to obtain the hemiacetal 24 looked successful
by TLC, but upon 1H NMR analysis the material was
determined to be a complex mixture of products with
distinctive aldehyde signals, although these did not seem to
relate to the major component (see Supporting Information).
Despite this, the material was taken forward to attempt the
preparation of 20. Attempts at preparing the trichloro-
acetimidate using standard conditions did not result in any
observable formation of 20, but only again gave a complex
mixture of products. We presumed that inability to form 20
was due to 3,6-anhydro-galactose preferring to exist in the
open aldehyde form rather than the bicyclic pyranose form
(Scheme 4), which is required for the successful reaction. This
preference has been shown through the study of 3,6-anhydro-
D-galactose, which was found to have aldehydic character due
to the added ring strain caused by the 3,6-anhydro-bridge.29
Another possible reason is that this system could also be too
armed to be isolated with standard conditions, which
additionally would not make it a desirable glycosyl donor.
Based on these results, in order to avoid the 3,6-anhydro-
galactose hemiacetal, a glycosyl donor needed to be prepared
where the activatable leaving group was in place before
formation of the 3,6-anhydro-bridge. Indeed, this result
highlights the benefit of a thioglycoside, used previously in
this regard,15 where the activatable group is stable to many
different chemistries and this stability allows for manipulation
of the other hydroxy groups to generate molecules of
interest.30 Thus, the diol 25 was prepared from the 6-O-
tosylate 2631 via treatment with methanolic NaOMe (Scheme
5), and protection of 25 yielded the benzyl protected putative
The galactosyl donor 12 developed by Kiso and co-
workers20,21 has been shown to be an excellent glycosyl
donor that gives exclusively α-anomeric products, despite the
participating benzoyl group at C2 (Scheme 2). Gratifyingly,
glycosylation of 12 with the acceptor 8 resulted in formation of
the disaccharide 13 in excellent yield (82%) and with no
observable formation of the undesired β-glycoside. The di-tert-
butylsilylene group was then selectively removed with 70%
HF−pyridine to obtain the diol 14, which was selectively
tosylated to furnish the tosylate 15. Aqueous acid-mediated
hydrolysis of the 4,6-O-benzylidene acetal afforded the triol 16,
and finally treatment with methanolic NaOMe removed both
the benzoate protecting groups and concurrently formed the
desired 3,6-anhydro-bridge to give 1. With this successful route
now developed, it was then applied, using instead the thiol
acceptor 17,22 to the synthesis of 2 in good yield (Scheme 3).
Expediting the synthesis of 1 would be useful in the
synthesis of related compounds. Thus, with 1 and 2 in hand via
the late-stage ring closure method, we now looked into the
application of using a 3,6-anhydro-galactosyl donor that would
allow for the formation of α-glycosides (Figure 2). Indeed, it
has been suggested that molecules of this type would be highly
armed glycosyl donors.23,24 In the first instance we wanted to
explore the possible formation and use of a glycosyl imidate25
based donor, as these types of donors are common throughout
synthetic carbohydrate chemistry, so the synthesis of the 3,6-
anhydro-galactosyl-based trichloroacetimidate 20 was attemp-
ted (Scheme 4). Treatment of allyl β-D-galactopyranoside 21
using Appel reaction conditions, which have previously been
used in the synthesis of other 3,6-anhydro-galactosides,7,26,27
successfully installed the 3,6-anhydro-bridge yielding the diol
a
Scheme 5
a
Scheme 4
a
(a) NaOMe, MeOH, rt, 91%; (b) R−Br, NaH, DMF, rt, 95−99%.
donor 27. For α-selectivity, formation of the heavily disfavored
1,2-cis-equatorial bond was required. We were drawn to the
methodologies used in β-D-mannosyl-, β-L-rhamnosyl-, and
uronic acid 6,3-lactone-based glycosylations, as these have the
desired 1,2-cis-equatorial system. The preactivation strategy
pioneered by Crich and co-workers32 has been utilized for
these difficult glycosylations, which entails preactivation of an
appropriate thioglycoside with an activator and Tf2O.
Previously Christina et al.15 applied this system to a
comparable 3,6-anhydro-galactosyl donor to study the
reactivity and selectivity of a galacturonic acid 6,3-lactone
thioglycoside as a glycosyl donor. However, they did not
explore the utility of 3,6-anhydro-galactosyl donors in great
detail.15
In the first instance, the benzyl protected 27 was
glycosylated with a test acceptor 28, first using the common
NIS/TfOH promotor system for comparison. Pleasingly, the
disaccharide 29 was obtained in good yield (Table 1);
a
(a) CBr4, PPh3, pyridine, 60 °C, 91%; (b) BnBr, NaH, DMF, rt,
95%; (c) PdCl2, NaOAc, AcOH/H2O 9:1, EtOAc, rt.
D
J. Org. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX