346
G. Guo et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 472 (2009) 343–346
ZnO nanoparticles by gases in fluidized bed) to avoid the contact
and aggregation of ZnO nanoparticles. The related investigation is
currently being undertaken in our lab.
Scheme 1. Morphology evolution model of ZnO nanomaterials at different temper-
atures.
4. Conclusion
In summary, well-dispersed ZnO nanomaterials were prepared
via the formation of zinc stearate precursor and its subsequent ther-
mal decomposition in air. Controlling the calcination temperature
is effective to tailor the morphology of as-prepared ZnO nano-
materials. The uniform decomposition of nanosheet-like precursor
results in the formation of well-dispersed ZnO nanomaterials. FT-IR
and XRD results show the gradual decomposition of precursor to
produce ZnO with relatively high purity. A morphology evolution
model is proposed to explain the formations of products at different
temperatures.
Apparently, the synthesis route of ZnO nanoparticles in the
present work is relatively simple. The results can be easily repeated
and are useful for the large-scale controllable production at low
cost. It is also expected other metal oxide nanomaterials could be
synthesized by the same method.
mation of small nanopyramids in large quantity. Similarly, the
decomposition at 773 K leads to the formation of uniform ZnO
nanoparticles with diameter of about 150 nm (Fig. 3D). The mor-
phology and size of ZnO powders were further investigated by
TEM. Fig. 4A clearly shows that the nanosheets consist of nanorods
with diameters of 25–65 nm and lengths of 300–900 nm. There
are many holes around the nanorods, indicating the in situ ther-
mal decomposition and the release of gases (i.e. steam, CO2 or
CO, etc.) from the nanosheets in the decomposition process. After
ultrasonic treatment in ethanol, the nanorods were separated from
the nanosheets. This phenomenon indicates the weak interaction
between nanorods and further proves our deduction that the for-
mation of ZnO is resulted from the in situ decomposition of zinc
stearate. Probably, the low temperature provides the opportunity
for the new ZnO species self-assembly to nanorods. Comparatively,
the calcination at 673 or 773 K is intense and the release of gases
would be quickly. Therefore, the sheet-like texture is unable to
maintain but collapse quickly to form nanopyramids or nanoparti-
cles in large quantity. SAED pattern (inset in Fig. 4B and C) indicates
that as-prepared ZnO nanopyramids and nanoparticles are single
crystal.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Bei-
jing Natural Science Foundation (No. 2073029) and Foundation of
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Green product (GC200604).
ZnO nanopyramids and nanoparticles are well-dispersed, due
to the above quick formation of many small seeds simultane-
ously. It is the in situ protection of organic compounds around the
ZnO species which prevents the agglomeration of ZnO particles.
separately, the product after higher temperature decomposition
is due to the further transform of mediate product formed at
low temperature. Therefore, the nanoparticles at 773 K are formed
due to the further transformation of nanopyramids, as shown in
Scheme 1. Obviously, the temperature of 773 K makes the melt-
ing of the rigid surface of nanopyramids (at 673 K) become much
smooth and round surface of ZnO particles. The fast elevating to
773 K for 3 h is different from that of elevating to 673 K for 3 h and
the subsequent elevating to 773 K. Much smaller seeds in high con-
centration may be simultaneously produced in the former mode as
773 K for 3 h (Fig. 4C) is smaller than that at 673 K for 3 h (Fig. 4B).
Moreover, temperature of 773 K seems somewhat higher for the
thermal decomposition of such materials and leads to the further
agglomeration of ZnO nanoparticles after the total evaporation or
decomposition of organic compounds (Fig. 4C). From this view-
point, it is necessary to provide a much large space (i.e. suspending
References
[1] C. Feldmann, H.O. Jungk, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40 (2001) 359–362.
[2] J. Joo, S.G. Kwon, J.H. Yu, T. Hyeon, Adv. Mater. 17 (2005) 1873–1877.
[3] M.H. Huang, S. Mao, H. Feick, H. Yan, Y. Wu, H. Kind, E. Webber, R. Russo, P. Yang,
Science 292 (2001) 1897–1899.
[4] F.F. Bai, P. He, Z.J. Jia, X.T. Huang, Y. He, Mater. Lett. 59 (2005) 1687–1690.
[5] H. Kind, H. Yan, B. Messer, M. Law, P. Yang, Adv. Mater. 14 (2002)
158–160.
[6] J. Zhang, L.D. Sun, X.C. Jiang, C.S. Liao, C.H. Yan, Cryst. Growth Des. 4 (2004)
309–313.
[7] A. Waag, Th. Gruber, R. Sauer, R. Kling, C. Kirchner, H. Ress, J. Alloys Compd. 371
(2004) 77–81.
[8] B.S. Zou, V.V. Volkov, Z.L. Wang, Chem. Mater. 11 (1999) 3037–3043.
[9] Y.H. Tong, Y.C. Liu, C.L. Shao, Y.X. Liu, C.S. Xu, J.Y. Zhang, Y.M. Lu, D.Z. Shen, X.W.
Fan, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 14714–14718.
[10] X.D. Wu, L.J. Zheng, D. Wu, Langmuir 21 (2005) 2665–2667.
[11] J. Park, K. An, Y. Hwang, J.G. Park, H.J. Noh, J.Y. Kim, J.H. Park, N.M. Hwang, T.
Hyeon, Nat. Mater. 3 (2004) 891–895.
[12] K. An, N. Lee, J. Park, S.C. Kim, Y. Hwang, J.G. Park, J.Y. Kim, J.H. Park, M.J. Han, J.
Yu, T. Hyeon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 9753–9760.
[13] D.L. Tao, W.Z. Qian, Y. Huang, F. Wei, J. Cryst. Growth 271 (2004) 353–357.
[14] K.S. Krishna, U. Mansoori, N.R. Selvi, M. Eswaramoorthy, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
46 (2007) 5962–5965.
[15] D.L. Tao, F. Wei, Mater. Lett. 58 (2004) 3226–3228.
[16] Z.H. Wang, D.L. Tao, G.S. Guo, S. Jin, F. Wei, W.Z. Qian, S. Hong, J. Guo, Mater. Lett.
60 (2006) 3104–3108.