1
284
C. Tian et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 46 (2011) 1283–1289
Recently, it was reported that the metal–ethylene glycol (metal–EG)
complexes could be used as precursor to prepare corresponding
oxides via solid-state pyrolysis process [17–19]. Typical samples
included Sn–EG, V–EG and Zn–EG. It has been found that Zn–EG
complexes were sensitive to water, that is, could hydrolyze to form
ZnO in pure water with no adding additional alkali [19]. This
phenomenon stimulated us think if the characteristic could be
utilized to controllably synthesize corresponding oxides. Herein, we
demonstrate, for the first time, the complexes obtained by reaction
recorded on a Rigaku D/Max-2550 (40 kV, 200 mA) diffractometer
using Cu K radiation with wavelength of = 0.15406 nm. FT-IR
spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Spectrum One spectrom-
eter using KBr pellets in the range of 400–4000 cm . Thermo-
gravimetric analysis was performed on a TG (TA, Q600) thermal
analyzer under air with a heating rate of 10 K/min. The nitrogen
adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured at 77 K using an
Micromeritics Tristar. Before measurement, the samples were out
gassed at 150 8C for 4.5 h, the specific surface area of the materials
was calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) theory.
a
l
ꢀ1
of anhydrous zinc acetate and EG (refereed as Zn–EG–AC in here, EG:
ꢀ
ethylene glycol, AC: CH
3
COO groups) could act as a suitable
precursor for fabricating ZnO crystals with various morphologies,
including typically hexagonal rings, hexagonal plates, tubes, prisms,
twinned discs and some hierarchical structure. Compared to the
methods reported before, present route has several obvious
advantages. First, ZnO particles with a variety of morphologies
and uniform shape (up to 15 kinds) were easily fabricated by simply
tuning the experimentalparameters. Second, nodangerous reagents
3. Results and discussion
Scheme 1 is a schematic procedure to prepare ZnO micro/nano
structures. The process includes the first preparation of Zn–EG–AC
precursor (Step 1), and its subsequent hydrolysis to form ZnO
crystals (Step 2). The precursor was characterized by IR, TG, XRD,
and SEM techniques. In IR spectra (Fig. S1), the broad peak at about
ꢀ
1
3
(such as strong alkali NaOH and NH ) were used in whole
3416 cm is assigned to
n(O–H) from adsorbed water, while the
ꢀ1
preparation process. The shape-controllable synthesis was related
intimately with the characteristics of Zn–EG–AC precursor used in
here, such as easily adjusting the hydrolysis rate by water amount
and good dispersity in reaction medium.
peaks located at 2830–2960 cm are indexed to the vibration of
ꢀ
1
C–H bands. In addition, the peaks in the range of 1000–1250 cm
can be indexed to (CH ), (C–C) and (C–O) bands. As control, IR
r
2
n
n
spectra of EG is also provided. It can be seen that most peaks in IR
spectra of EG and Zn–EG–AC spectra are same. The results indicate
the presence of EG unit in the precursor. In addition, the two peaks
2
. Materials and methods
ꢀ1
at 1425 and 1561 cm in Zn–EG–AC precursor are ascribed to the
ꢀ
2.1. Chemicals
n
as and
n
s
(O 55 C–O–) bands of CH
3
COO groups, indicating the
ꢀ
presence of CH
3
COO in the products. TG analysis is also
Zinc acetate dihydrate (Zn(CH
ethylene glycol (EG), ethanol, cetyltriethylammonium bromide
CTAB), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP,
K30), glucose and starch were purchased from Tianjin Kermel
Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. PEO–PPO–PEO (P123) was purchased
form Sigma. All reagents were used as received without further
purification.
3
COOH)
2
ꢁ2H
2
O, Zn(Ac)
2
ꢁ2H
2
O),
performed to give deep insight on structure of Zn–EG–AC
precursor. As shown in Fig. S2, the loss weight before 100 8C
(about 3.5%) is due to the residual ethanol in the products from the
washing process. A major mass loss is observed at around 350 8C,
attributing to the decomposition of the Zn–EG–AC. Final weight
loss of as-prepared Zn–EG–AC within 350-600 8C is about 43%.
Based on proposed structure by Zhang et al. [20], the theoretical
loss weight from precursor to ZnO is about 35.13% calculated as
below:
(
2
.2. The preparation of ZnO micro/nanostructures
The anhydrous zinc acetate was obtained by heating
1
25:45 ꢀ 81:38
Zn(CH
3
COOH)
2
2
ꢁ2H O at 100 8C for 12 h. To prepare the precursor
Ratio of weight loss ¼
ꢂ 100% ¼ 35:15%
125:45
Zn–EG–AC, 4.0 g of anhydrous zinc acetate and 40 mL of the EG
were added in a 250 mL round-bottom flask and the solution was
heated at 160 8C for 1 h. After naturally cooling to room
temperature, the white solids were separated by centrifugation
and washed with anhydrous ethanol for 3 times. The products
were saved under vacuum at 40 8C. The reaction could be scaled-up
by increasing the amount of the anhydrous zinc acetate and EG.
where 125.45 is the theoretical molecular weight of Zn(OCH2-
CH O), and 81.38 is that of ZnO. The value (35.13%) is very close to
value tested by our TG results. The deviation between experimen-
2
tal (about 43%) and theoretic (35.13%) values should be due to
ꢀ
presences of CH
3
COO groups. Compared with –OCH
2
CH
2
O–, the
ꢀ
CH
3
COO have similar molecular but with little coordination
‘The ZnO micro/nanostructures were prepared by the hydrolysis
number (2:1). Thus, the ratio of ZnO will decrease in precursor. In
addition, XRD pattern of the precursor shows an intensive peak at
about 108 (Fig. S3), which is characteristic to M (metal)–EG
composites (metal = Sn, V and Zn) [17–19]. By combination of XRD,
IR, TG analyses and previous work, the proposed structure of
precursor should be Zn (OCH
< x + y < 2. For convenience, we call the precursor as Zn–EG–
AC. SEM analysis shows that the precursor are the long wire with
the diameter about 500 nm and length of several tens micrometers
of Zn–EG–AC precursor in water/ethanol solvent (or pure water).
Typically, for the preparation of ZnO nanorings, 4.0 g of Zn–EG–AC
precursor and 0.5 g of CTAB were added into the solvent that was
2
composed of 20 mL of H O and 20 mL of ethanol. After stirring at
room temperature for 1 h, the mixture was transferred to a 50 mL
Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was heated at
00 8C for 10 h. Final white products were separated by centrifuga-
tion, and purified through washing with distilled water and ethanol
for several times, finally dried at 60 8C. The experimental
parameters, including reaction temperature, time, kinds of surfac-
tant and volume ratioof ethanol/water (denoted as R), were tuned to
studythe influence of the parameters onthe morphologies of ZnO. In
all experiment, 4.0 g of Zn–EG–AC precursor was used.
ꢀ
2
CH
2
O)x(CH
3
COO )y, where
1
1
2.3. Characterizations
The morphology of the samples was studied by Hitachi S-4800
scanning electron microscope. X-ray diffraction pattern was
Scheme 1. Schematic process for fabrication of ZnO (n ꢃ 15).