Ortho-nitro effect on the diastereoselective control in sulfa-Staudinger and Staudinger cycloadditions

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules22050784

The ortho-nitro effect was discovered in sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions of ethoxycarbonylsulfene with linear imines. When an ortho-nitro group is present at the C-aryl substituents of linear imines, the sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions deliver cis-β-sulta

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules22050784

molecules
Article
Ortho-Nitro Effect on the Diastereoselective Control
in Sulfa-Staudinger and Staudinger Cycloadditions
Zhanhui Yang, Hassane Abdellaoui, Wei He and Jiaxi Xu *
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Department of Organic Chemistry,
Faculty of Science, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China;
zhyang_2008a@163.com (Z.Y.); hasabdel89@hotmail.fr (H.A.); bucthewei@163.com (W.H.)
* Correspondence: jxxu@mail.buct.edu.cn; Tel./Fax: +86-10-6443-5565
Academic Editor: Derek J. McPhee
Received: 6 February 2017; Accepted: 9 May 2017; Published: 12 May 2017
Abstract:
ethoxycarbonylsulfene with linear imines. When an ortho-nitro group is present at the C-aryl
substituents of linear imines, the sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions deliver cis- -sultams in considerable
amounts, together with the predominant trans- -sultams. In other cases, the above sulfa-Staudinger
cycloadditions give rise to trans- -sultams exclusively. Further mechanistic rationalization discloses
The ortho-nitro effect was discovered in sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions of
β
β
β
that the ortho-nitro effect is attributed to its strong electron-withdrawing inductive effect. Similarly,
the ortho-nitro effect also exists in Staudinger cycloadditions of ethoxycarbonyl ketene with the imines.
The current research provides further insights into the diastereoselective control in sulfa-Staudinger
and Staudinger cycloadditions.
Keywords: nitro effect; diastereoselectivity; inductive effect; sulfa-Staudinger cycloaddition;
Staudinger cycloaddition; stereochemistry
1. Introduction
Recently,
mainly because of their outstanding biological activities as, for example, antibiotics and enzyme
inhibitors [ 13]. As a result, many synthetic methods to -sultams have been developed [14 17].
24], which is referred to as
β-sultams have received much attention in both synthetic and medicinal chemistry [1–8],
9
–
β
–
Among them, the most promising is the sulfa-Staudinger cycloaddition [18
–
the [2s + 2i] annulation between sulfenes (or their equivalents) with imines, because of the rich and
diverse sources of the starting materials.
In our previous work, we successfully disclosed the stepwise mechanism of the sulfa-Staudinger
cycloaddition [25,26], and the substituent-controlled annuloselectivity [27,28] and diastereoselectivity [29]
in the cycloaddition. The previous studies on the diastereoselectivity revealed that the [2s + 2i]
annulation of the active ethoxycarbonylmethanesulfonyl chloride (1a) and ethyl malonyl chloride (1b
with various linear imines 2 gave trans-β-sultams 3 or trans-β-lactams 4 exclusively, regardless of the
imine substituents (Scheme 1) [27 31]. However, in our continuing studies, we further found that
when C-2-nitroaryl imines were applied in the reactions, besides trans- -sultams , cis- -sultams
were generated in considerable amounts (Scheme 1, X = SO2). This unexpected phenomenon is,
)
–
2
β
3
β
5
herein, considered as the ortho-nitro effect. Moreover, such ortho-nitro effect also was observed in the
Staudinger ketene-imine cycloadditions (Scheme 1, X = CO).
Previous work on the nitro effect mainly focused on the reactivity of certain compounds [32–34],
mainly because of the electronic properties of the nitro group. In addition, the shielding effect of the
nitro group was also reported [35]. However, the nitro effect on the diastereoselectivity has not been
reported until now. Herein, we rationalize how the ortho-nitro effect works to generate cis-
β-sultams
and cis- -lactams in the reactions of C-2-nitroaryl imines with sulfenes and ketenes, respectively,
β
Molecules 2017, 22, 784; doi:10.3390/molecules22050784
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
2 of 16
and hope that the current research could help to further understand the diastereoselective control in
the sulfa-Staudinger and Staudinger cycloadditions.
Scheme 1. Diastereoselectivities in sulfa-Staudinger and Staudinger cycloadditions.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Experimental Studies on the Ortho-Nitro Effect in Controlling Cis-Selectivity of
Sulfa-Staudinger Cycloadditions
Previously, the ortho-nitro effect was seldom observed in our studies on the substituent-controlled
annuloselectivity [27
gave rise to a mixture of trans- and cis-
82:18 trans/cis ratio (Table 1, entry ) [36]. However, C-3- and 4-nitrophenyl imines 2b and 2c afforded
the corresponding trans- -sultams 3b and 3c exclusively in 79% and 41% isolated yields, respectively,
in the reactions with the same sulfonyl chloride 1a (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). The sulfa-Staudinger
reactions of other C-2-nitrophenyl imines 2d with sulfonyl chloride 1a produced the corresponding
cis- -sultams 5d as well, with trans/cis ratios 86:14, 88:12, and 97:3, respectively (Table 1, entries 4–6).
,28]. The reaction between sulfonyl chloride 1a and C-2-nitrophenylimine 2a
β-sultams 3a and 5a in 66% total isolated yield, with an
1
β
–
f
β
–f
The increasing trend of the trans/cis ratios from entry 4 to entry 6 is in good accordance to our previous
diastereoselective guidelines, that is, the bulky N-substituents of imines favor the trans-selectivity [29].
These results indicate that the generation of cis-β-sultams in the sulfa-Staudinger reactions of
C-2-nitrophenyl imines with ethoxycarbonylmethanesulfonyl chloride (1a) is a general and regular
phenomenon. In these reactions, the ortho-nitro group on the C-aryl group plays an important role
in formation of cis-β-sultams. Experimental results from entries 7–9 in Table 1 present a decreasing
trend of the trans/cis ratios without obvious difference between C-2-nitrophenylimine 2a and C-3- and
4-nitrophenylimines 2b and 2c, revealing that the ortho-nitro effect does not exist in the sulfa-Staudinger
cycloadditions involving other alkanesulfonyl chlorides, such as phenylmethanesulfonyl chloride (1c).
In the presence of weak bases such as pyridine, the ortho-nitro effect still exists (Table 1, entries 10–12).
In addition, [2 + 2 + 2] cycloadducts
were employed (Table 1, entries 2 and 3), while [4 + 2] annuladducts
7
were observed in low yields when excessive N-methyl imines
, generated from enolate-sulfene
8
and imines, were not observed in any cases. It is noteworthy that the trans/cis ratios do not change
upon storage for several months or treatment with imines for several days, indicating that the reactions
are under kinetic control.
To distinguish whether other ortho-substituents affect the diastereoselectivity, other imines derived
from ortho-substituted aromatic aldehydes were also tested in the reactions of sulfonyl chloride 1a
.
As shown in entries 2–9 in Table 2, regardless of the ortho-substituents of imines 2g , all the
–
o
sulfa-Staudinger annuladducts trans-3g–o were generated in excellent diastereoselectivities, with the
trans/cis ratios varying from 97:3 to 100:0. All the above results indicate that only when a nitro group
is present at the ortho-position in the C-aryl groups of imines
2 would cis-β-sultams be generated
in considerable amounts. The other 2-substituents at the aryl groups of imines scarcely affect the

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
3 of 16
diastereoselectivities, as demonstrated by reactions of imines 2g
–
o
(Table 2, entries 2–10). However,
the presence of an additional electron-withdrawing group, such as 4-NO2 and 5-MeO (according to
Hammett constants, meta-MeO is an electron-withdrawing group), at the 2-nitroaryl promoted the
formation of the corresponding cis-products, as shown in entries 11 and 12 of Table 2.
Table 1. Sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions involving C-nitrophenyl imines a.
Yield (%) b
Entry
R1
NO2
Imine R2
trans/cis Ratio c
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
EtO2C
EtO2C
EtO2C
EtO2C
EtO2C
EtO2C
Ph
Ph
Ph
EtO2C
EtO2C
EtO2C
2-NO2
3-NO2
4-NO2
2-NO2
2-NO2
2-NO2
2-NO2
3-NO2
4-NO2
2-NO2
3-NO2
4-NO2
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2a
2b
2c
2a
2b
2c
Me
Me
Me
n-Pr
Bn
t-Bu
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
66
79 d
41 d
66
71
65
36
30
37
97
3a:5a
3b:5b
3c:5c
3d:5d
3e:5e
3f:5f
82:18
100:0
100:0
86:14
88:12
97:3
52:48
54:46
43:57
63:37
100:0
100:0
0
13
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
3ac:5ac
3bc
:5bc
3cc:5cc
3a:5a
3b:5b
3c:5c
10 e
11 e
12 e
0
0
0
92
99
a
Reactions conducted on a 0.5-mmol scale based on sulfonyl chloride; The data in entries 1–3 were directly cited
b
from refs. [27
,
28]. Isolated total yield; c Ratios were determined by the 1H-NMR analysis of the isolated mixture.
d
e
Also see ref. [27]. These reactions were performed with 1.2 equivalents of sulfonyl chloride 1a, 1.0 equivalent of
imines 2a–c, and 1.2 equivalents of pyridine.
Table 2. Sulfa-Staudinger reactions of C-2-substitutedaryl imines with ethoxycarbonylmethanesulfonyl
chloride (1a) a.
Yield (%) b
Entry
Imine
R3
R4
trans/cis Ratio c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2a
2g
2h
2i
2j
2k
2l
NO2
Me
CF3
OMe
F
Cl
Br
Cl
Ph
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
6-Cl
H
66
55
37
78
72
68
70
53
69
3a:5a
3:5g
3h:5h
3i:5i
3j:5j
3k:5k
3l:5l
82:18
99:1
97:3
99:1
95:5
97:3
97:3
99:1
100:0
2m
2n
3m:5m
3n:5n
10
2o
85
3o:5o
100:0
11
12
2p
2q
NO2
NO2
4-NO2
5-MeO
60
87
3p:5p
3q:5q
75:25
56:44
a
b
c
Reactions conducted on a 0.5-mmol scale based on sulfonyl chloride.
determined by the 1H-NMR analysis of the isolated mixture.
Isolated total yield. Ratios were

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
4 of 16
2.2. Rationale on the Ortho-Nitro Effect in Controlling Cis-Selectivity of Sulfa-Staudinger Cycloadditions
One question of significant concern is how the ortho-nitro effect controls the formation of
cis-
sulfa-Staudinger reactions should first be introduced. In our previous report [25
for the formation of -sultam rings has been rationalized. Under thermal conditions, the imines exist
in E-configuration, as demonstrated by our previous work [37]. As depicted in Scheme 2, arylmethane-
or alkane-sulfonyl chlorides to afford intermediates
(R1 = aryl or alkyl) first sulfonylate imines
which further generate intermediates or their resonation forms through elimination of a proton by
a weak base or imines. Alternatively, sulfenes , generated from electron-deficient sulfonyl chlorides
(R1 = CO2Et) such as ethoxycarbonylmethanesulfonyl chloride (1a) in the presence of weakly basic
imines 27 29], react with nucleophilic imines to deliver intermediates or their resonation
forms . Direct conrotation of gives rise to cis- -sultams , while isomerization of into , followed
produces trans- -sultams . The isomerization step is realized by a C–N bond
and as possible intermediates. The diastereoselectivity (cis/trans-selectivity)
β-sultams together with trans-β-sultams. Before answering this question, the mechanism in
–29], the mechanism
β
1
2
A,
C
D
B
1
2
[
–
2
C
D
D
β
5
D
E
by conrotation of
rotation through
E
G
β
3
F
is virtually the competitive results between the direct conrotation and isomerization of zwitterionic
2,3-thiaza-1,3-butadiene-type intermediates . The electron-withdrawing substituents of sulfenes
decrease the rate (kd) of the direct conrotatory ring closure of zwitterionic intermediates , resulting
in favorable formation of trans- -sultams , while the electron-withdrawing C-substituents of
D
D
β
3
imines increase the rate of the direct conrotatory ring closure, leading to predominant formation
of cis-β-sultams 5.
Scheme 2. Mechanism of sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions.
Szymonifka and Heck also studied the reactions of methoxycarbonylsufene with imines, and
trans-β-sultams were formed exclusively [19]. They proposed zwitterionic enolate-iminium intermediates
H (eqn. 1, Scheme 3). As demonstrated by Tsuge and Iwanami’s results [38], if enolate-iminium
intermediates
4,4-dioxides
oxathiazine 4,4-dioxide products
H
8
are formed, the more favorable six-membered products 2,3-dihydro-1,4,3-oxathiazine
should be generated (eqn. 2, Scheme 3). However, the fact is that 2,3-dihydro-1,4,3-
were not observed in either Szymonifka’s [19] or our studies (eqn. 1,
29]. Therefore, it is not enolate-iminium intermediates but sulfenolate-iminium
or that partake in the ring closure step in the ester-stabilized systems. The results
8
Scheme 3) [27
intermediates
–
D
H
E

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
5 of 16
are in accordance with the general observation that acylacetate esters are predominantly enolized
rather than malonate diesters.
Scheme 3. Sulfenolate-iminium vs. enolate-iminium intermediates in the sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions
involving acylsulfenes.
The reaction of sulfonyl chloride 1a and C-2-nitrophenylimine 2a shows higher cis-selectivity
(trans/cis ratio of 82:18) than those in reactions of 1a with C-3- and 4-nitrophenyl imines 2b and 2c
(Table 1, entries 1–3). Additionally, all reactions of C-2-nitrophenylimines 2d
compared with reactions of other C-2-substituted phenyl imines 2g (Table 1, entries 4–6 vs. Table 2,
entries 2–9). Thus, in reactions of C-2-nitrophenylimines, the formation of cis- -sultams can be
attributed to the strong electron-withdrawing inductive effect of the ortho-nitro group rather than steric
hindrance. Both C-3- and 4-nitrophenyl imines 2b and 2c afforded the corresponding trans- -sultams
–f increase cis-selectivities
–o
β
5
β
3b and 3c exclusively in the reactions with the same sulfonyl chloride 1a (Table 1, entries 2 and 3)
due to longer distances from the nitro group to the carbon atom of the iminium than that in the
ortho-nitro substrate, weakening the electron-withdrawing inductive effect because the inductive effect
exerts electron-withdrawing influence through the carbon chain and decreases along with distance.
The results also reveal that the conjugation effect of the nitro group does not play an important role in
controlling the cis-selectivity because the conjugation effect is not closely related to the distance.
To further verify the influence of the inductive effect of the nitro group on the diastereoselectivity,
imine 2p with C-2,4-dinitrophenyl group and imine 2q with C-5-methoxy-2-nitrophenyl group were
reacted with sulfonyl chloride 1a; the corresponding cis-β-sultams 5p and 5q increased obviously
compared with that from C-2-nitrophenylimine 2a. The results indicate that the ortho-nitro effect on
the cis-selectivity is its strong electron-withdrawing inductive effect.
On the other hand, the increase of cis-
β-sultams
5 may also be obtained by decelerating the
isomerization of to
D
E (Scheme 2). One significantly important factor in affecting the isomerization
is the steric hindrance of R2. The isomerization is realized by the C–N bond rotation (from F to G).
If R2 is sterically too large, the C–N conrotation will not overcome the steric hindrance between
R1 and R2, and the isomerization will be decelerated or prevented, promoting the generation of
cis-
of phenylmethanesulfonyl chlorides with (E)-1-(anthracen-9-yl)-N-benzylmethanimine, which bore
a sterically very large 9-anthracenyl group (R2), and only cis-
-sultam was obtained in our previous
work [29]. Imines 2g−o in entries 2–9 in Table 2 have sterically approximate or larger groups than
the nitro group at their 2-positions. However, cis- -sultams were generated in trace amounts.
The comparison indicates that it is not the steric interaction between the ortho-nitroaryl group (R2)
and the ethoxycarbonyl group that leads to cis- -sultams . Actually, as illustrated in Scheme 2,
during the isomerization of to , the C–N bond rotation in intermediates could occur clockwise
or anticlockwise, following the direction with the least steric hindrance. In other words, the steric
β-sultams 5, even as sole products in some cases. This phenomenon was observed in the reactions
β
β
5
β
5
D
E
F

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
6 of 16
interaction between the ortho-substituents and CO2Et cannot decelerate the isomerization, and this
is the reason why the reactions of a variety of 2-substituted imines with 1a predominantly give
trans-β-sultams 3
(Table 2, entries 2–10). The steric interaction between the ortho-nitroaryl group (R1)
and the ethoxycarbonyl group (R2) is not the key factor that leads to the ortho-nitro effect.
Additionally, the electrostatic interaction between the ortho-nitro group and the ethoxycarbonyl
group is possibly another factor for the ortho-nitro effect as shown in (Figure 1); the positively charged
nitrogen atom of the nitro group interacts with the partially negatively charged oxygen atom of
the C=O bond in the ethoxycarbonyl group, to some extent stabilizing the intermediates D0 and
decelerating the isomerization of D0 to E0. As a consequence, cis-
β-sultams 5 were generated. Thus,
the electrostatic interaction is another rationale for the ortho-nitro effect in the current sulfa-Staudinger
cycloadditions. Such an electrostatic interaction does not exist between the 3-nitro or 4-nitro group
and the ethoxycarbonyl group possibly because of the far distance between them. Consequently,
the corresponding cis-β-sultams 5b or 5c were not generated (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). However, on the
basis of the results from imines 2p and 2q, the electrostatic interaction between the ortho-nitro group
and the ethoxycarbonyl group is not a major factor for the ortho-nitro effect even if it exists.
Figure 1. Ortho-nitro effect by possible electrostatic interaction.
2.3. Ortho-Nitro Effect in the Staudinger Ketene-Imine Cycloadditions
To examine the generality of the ortho-nitro effect, the Staudinger cycloadditions of ethyl
malonyl chloride (1b) and some C-nitroaryl imines
2 were conducted. The ortho-nitro effect was
also observed in Staudinger ketene-imine cycloadditions. The results were summarized in Table 3.
Ethoxycarbonylketene, generated from ethyl malonyl choride (1b) in the presence of 2-chloropyridine,
smoothly reacted with C-2-nitrophenyl imine 2d, giving rise to both trans-4d and cis-6d with a trans/cis
ratio as 83:17 (Table 3, entry 1) [36]. However, the reactions of C-3-nitrophenyl and C-4-nitrophenyl
imines 2p and 2q delivered trans-β-lactams 4p and 4q exclusively in 54%, and 58% yields, respectively
(Table 3, entries 2 and 3). The ortho-nitro effect in the Staudinger ketene-imine cycloaddition is a
common phenomenon, and is affected by the N-substituents of C-2-nitroaryl imines. For example,
the reactions of N-methyl imine 2a and N-benzyl imine 2e afforded the trans/cis ratios in 85:15 and
81:19, respectively (Table 3, entries 4 and 5). However, the reaction of N-tert-butyl imine 2f produced
more cis-
effect [39
74% yield (Table 3, entry 7).
β
-lactam 6f with a 64:36 trans/cis ratio (Table 3, entry 6) possibly due to the Thorpe-Ingold
,
40]. Correspondingly, imine 2r reacted with acyl chloride 1b, only giving trans- -lactam 4r in
β
The ortho-nitro effect exists in not only sulfa-Staudinger sulfene-imine cycloadditions, but also
Staudinger ketene-imine cycloadditions, to some extent indicating that the structures of the two
zwitterionic intermediates D and I involved in the above two types of cycloadditions are similar [37,41–48]
(Figure 2). The nature of the ortho-nitro effect in Staudinger cycloadditions is the same as that in
sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions.

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
7 of 16
Table 3. Ortho-nitro effect in Staudinger reactions a.
Yield (%) b
Entry
Imine
R1
R2
Trans/cis Ratio c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2d
2r
2s
2a
2e
2f
2t
2-NO2
3-NO2
4-NO2
2-NO2
2-NO2
2-NO2
H
Pr
Pr
Pr
Me
Bn
t-Bu
43
54
58
18
34
4d:6d
4r:6r
4s:6s
4a:6a
4e:6e
4f:6f
4t:6t
83:17
100:0
100:0
85:15
81:19
64:36
100:0
51
74
t-Bu
a
b
Reactions conducted a on 0.5-mmol scale based on imine
1H-NMR analysis of the reaction mixture.
2;
Isolated total yield; c Ratios were determined by the
Figure 2. Key zwitterionic intermediates involved in sulfa-Staudinger and Staudinger cycloadditions.
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Materials and Instruments
Tetrahydrofuran was dried by refluxing over sodium with diphenyl ketone as an indicator.
Melting points were obtained on a Yanaco MP-500 melting point apparatus (Yanaco Ltd., Osaka,
Japan) and are uncorrected. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AM 400 MHz
spectrometer (Bruker Company, Billerica, MA, USA) in CDCl3 with TMS as an internal standard and
the chemical shifts (δ) are reported in parts per million (ppm). The IR spectra (KBr pellets) were
taken on a Nicolet FTIR 920 spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). HRMS
measurements were carried out on an Agilent LC/MSD TOF mass spectrometer (Agilent, Santa Clara,
CA, USA). TLC separations were performed on silica gel GF254 plates (Qingdao Ocean Chemical
Industry, Qingdao, China), and the plates were visualized with UV light. Column chromatography
was performed on silica gel zcx II (200–300 mesh) (Qingdao Ocean Chemical Industry, Qingdao, China)
with petroleum-ether (PE) and ethyl-acetate (EA) (Beijing Chemical Reagent Company, Beijing, China)
as the eluent.
3.2. General Procedure for the Sulfa-Staudinger Cycloadditions of Sulfonyl Chlorides 1a,c and Imines 2
To a solution of imine
2 (1 mmol) in dry THF (2 mL) was added a solution of sulfonyl chloride 1a
(or 1c) (0.5 mmol) in dry THF (0.5 mL) for 0.5 min at room temperature. The mixture was then allowed
to stand at room temperature for 24 h, followed by dilution with ether (10 mL), washing with brine
(10 mL), and drying over Na2SO4. Filtrating off the desiccant and removing the solvents under vacuum
gave rise to a residue, which subsequently was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel
with a mixture of petroleum ether (PE, 30–60 ◦C) and ethyl acetate (EA) as eluent to give the desired
β-sultam products.
For the reactions in entries 10–12 in Table 1, the following procedure was used. To a solution
of imine 2a or 2b or 2c (22 mg, 0.125 mmol) and pyridine (12 mg, 0.15 mmol) in dry THF (0.5 mL)
was added a solution of sulfonyl chloride 1a (28 mg, 0.15 mmol) in dry THF (0.25 mL) for 0.5 min at

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
8 of 16
room temperature. Then the mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 24 h, followed
by dilution with ether (5 mL), and washing with brine (5 mL). Removing the solvents under vacuum
gave rise to a residue, which subsequently was subjected to NMR analysis to determine the trans/cis
ratios and yields.
Ethyl trans-2-methyl-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3a) [27,28]: Compounds
trans-3a and cis-5a were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 82:18. Yellow oil. Total yield
1
66% (103 mg). H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.11–8.08 (m, 1H), 7.83–7.79 (m, 1H), 7.63–7.59 (m, 1H)
,
5.02 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (s, 3H), 1.37 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H).
13C-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 162.3, 148.3, 134.7, 131.7, 130.1, 129.6, 128.3, 125.4, 80.8, 63.3, 51.6, 31.8, 14.0
.
Ethyl cis-2-methyl-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (5a) [27,28]: Yellowish oil.
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.23 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.83–7.79 (m, 1H),
7.63–7.59 (m, 1H), 5.67 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.94 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.08–3.97 (m, 2H), 2.87 (s, 3H),
1.09 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H).
13C-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 161.5, 147.7, 134.4, 133.4, 129.65, 129.64, 125.5,
76.9, 62.5, 53.1, 29.7, 13.7.
Ethyl trans-2-methyl-3-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3b): Known compound [27,28]
.
◦
Colorless crystals. M.p.: 105–107 C. Yield 79% (124 mg). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.37 (t,
J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (ddd, J = 8.2, 2.1, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.88
(d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.44
−
4.37 (m, 1H), 4.37 4.28 (m, 1H), 2.81 (s, 3H), 1.36 (t,
−
J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 161.8, 148.8, 137.6, 132.6, 130.5, 124.3, 121.7, 79.2, 63.5,
54.5, 31.4, 14.0.
Ethyl trans-2-methyl-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3c): Known compound.
1
Colorless oil. Yield 41% (69 mg). H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.29 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.7 Hz
,
2H), 4.85 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.60 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (dq, J = 10.8, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (dq, J = 10.8,
7.1 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (s, 3H), 1.36 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 161.8, 148.5, 142.3, 127.6,
124.5, 79.2, 63.5, 54.5, 31.4, 14.0.
Ethyl trans-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3d): Compounds trans-3d
and cis-5d were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 86:14, from a 1mmol-scale reaction.
1
Yellow oil, total yield 66% (225 mg). H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.15 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (dd,
J = 8.2, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.61–7.55 (m, 1H), 5.07 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (d, J = 4.8 Hz,
1H), 4.40 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.44–3.31 (m, 1H), 3.01–2.90 (m, 1H), 1.68–1.57 (m, 2H), 1.36 (t, J = 7.1 Hz,
3H), 0.98 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 162.3, 134.4, 132.4, 130.0, 128.5, 125.2, 80.4,
63.3, 50.1, 49.1, 21.6, 14.0, 11.6. IR (KBr):
ν 2968, 2938, 2872, 1745, 1533, 1367, 1338, 1258, 1184, 1001,
1011, 861, 793, 518 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H18N2NaO6S [M + Na]+: 365.0778; found: 365.0771.
1
Ethyl cis-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (5d): Yellow oil. H-NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.20 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.62–7.54 (m,
1H), 5.62 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.10–4.02 (m, 1H), 4.02–3.94 (m, 1H), 3.43–3.32
(m, 1H), 2.84–2.74 (m, 1H), 1.82–1.71 (m, 2H), 1.09 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.05 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR
(101 MHz, CDCl3): 162.4, 148.3, 134.2, 129.9, 129.6, 125.4, 76.3, 62.5, 51.6, 49.5, 21.8, 13.7, 11.7. IR (KBr):
ν
2968, 2938, 2872, 1745, 1533, 1367, 1338, 1258, 1184, 1001, 1011, 861, 793, 518 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd
for C14H18N2NaO6S [M + Na]+: 365.0778; found: 365.0771.
Ethyl trans-2-benzyl-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3e): Compounds trans-3e
and cis-5e were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 88:12, from a 1-mmol-scale reaction.
1
Yellow oil, total yield 71% (276 mg). H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.04 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56–7.46 (m, 1H), 7.32–7.22 (m, 5H), 5.13 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H),
4.84 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 4.25 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 1H),
1.36 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H)
128.7, 128.3, 125.0, 80.4, 63.3, 50.7, 49.8, 14.0. IR (KBr):
.
13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 162.2, 148.0, 134.2, 133.4, 131.9, 129.8, 128.9, 128.7,
ν
2987, 2920, 2846, 1735, 1610, 1533, 1453, 1370,

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
9 of 16
1348, 1181, 1030, 858, 742, 508 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C18H18N2NaO6S [M + Na]+: 413.0778;
found: 413.0774.
1
Ethyl cis-2-benzyl-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (5e): Yellow oil, H-NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.15 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.56–7.46 (m,
1H), 7.39–7.32 (m, 5H), 5.65 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 1H), 4.13
(d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H), 4.09–4.01 (m, 1H), 4.02–3.92 (m, 1H), 1.07 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H)
CDCl3): 162.1, 148.1, 134.0, 130.1, 129.8, 129.5, 128.9, 128.7, 128.7, 128.4, 125.2, 76.4, 62.4, 51.4, 51.0, 13.7.
.
13C-NMR (101 MHz,
IR (KBr):
ν
2987, 2920, 2846, 1735, 1610, 1533,1453, 1370, 1348, 1181, 1030, 858, 742, 508 cm−1. HRMS
(ESI) calcd for C18H18N2NaO6S [M + Na]+: 413.0778; found: 413.0774.
Ethyl trans-2-(tert-butyl)-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3f): Compounds
trans-3f and cis-5f were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 97:3, from a 1-mmol-scale
reaction. Only the characteristic data of trans-3f are given. Colorless crystals, yield 65% (231 mg).
M.p.: 145–150 ◦C, 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.25 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (t,
J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.52 (m, 1H), 5.35 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (q, J = 7.1 Hz
,
2H), 1.35 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.31 (s, 9H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 162.1, 148.0, 134.1, 129.7, 128.7,
124.8, 80.3, 63.1, 57.8, 45.1, 29.6, 27.7, 13.9, 0.9. IR (KBr):
ν 2965, 2923, 1738, 1533, 1455, 1332, 1267, 1178,
1162, 1069, 742, 707 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H20N2NaO6S [M + Na]+: 379.0934; found: 379.0930.
Trans- and Cis-2-methyl-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-4-phenyl-1,2-thiazetidine 1,1-dioxides (3ac and 5ac): These two
compounds were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 52:48, from a 1-mmol-scale reaction.
Since it was difficult to distinguish their 13C-NMR data. The analytical data are summarized together.
Colorless crystals. M.p.: 118–125 ◦C. Yield 15% (47 mg). For trans-3ac, 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
8.19 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.82–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.57–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.46 (s, 5H), 7.42–7.38 (m, 1H), 5.19
1
(d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 2.84 (s, 3H). For cis-5ac, H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
8.00–7.91 (m, 3H), 7.74–7.68 (m, 1H), 7.17–7.05 (m, 5H), 6.09 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H)
,
2.96 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 144.5, 144.4, 134.4, 134.1, 131.8, 130.4, 130.0, 129.8, 129.44,
129.38, 129.29, 129.1, 128.9, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.43, 127.35, 125.7, 125.0, 84.5, 81.1, 57.7, 55.7, 32.1,
30.9. IR (KBr):
ν
3070, 2920, 2337, 1524, 1447, 1351, 1322, 1168, 726, 508 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for
C15H14N2NaO4S [M + Na]+: 341.0566; found 341.0563.
Trans-2-methyl-3-(3-nitrophenyl)-4-phenyl-1,2-thiazetidine 1,1-dioxide (3bc): Compounds 3bc and 5bc were
◦
isolated from a 1-mmol-scale reaction. Colorless crystals. M.p.: 118–125 C. Yield: 15% (47 mg).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.28 (s, 1H), 8.25–8.21 (m, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (t, J = 7.9 Hz
,
1H), 7.46 (s, 5H), 5.20 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.85 (s, 4H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz,
CDCl3): 148.8, 138.0, 132.4, 130.4, 130.2, 129.3, 129.2, 127.6, 124.2, 121.6, 83.5, 60.3, 30.9. IR (KBr):
ν
3070, 2920, 2337, 1524, 1447, 1351, 1322, 1168, 726, 508 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H14N2NaO4S
[M + Na]+: 341.0566; found 341.0563.
Cis-2-methyl-3-(3-nitrophenyl)-4-phenyl-1,2-thiazetidine 1,1-dioxide (5bc): Colorless crystals. M.p.: 154–160 ◦C
.
Yield 15% (48 mg) 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.06–7.96 (m, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H),
7.41–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.21–7.11 (m, 5H), 5.81 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (s, 3H).
13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 148.2, 135.9, 133.1, 129.9, 129.5, 129.3, 128.5, 127.5, 123.2, 122.2, 80.8, 58.0,
31.7. IR (KBr):
ν
3070, 2920, 2337, 1524, 1447, 1351, 1322, 1168, 726, 508 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for
C15H14N2NaO4S [M + Na]+: 341.0566; found 341.0563.
Cis-2-methyl-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-4-phenyl-1,2-thiazetidine 1,1-dioxide (5cc): Known compound [29]. Colorless
◦
crystals. M.p.: 182–183 C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.20–7.10 (m, 9H, ArH), 5.83 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H)
,
4.82 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (s, 3H).
Trans-2-methyl-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-4-phenyl-1,2-thiazetidine 1,1-dioxide (3cc): Known compound [29]. Colorless
◦
crystals. M.p.: 168–169 C, 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.39–7.43 (m, 9H, ArH), 5.18 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H)
,
4.37 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.86 (s, 3H).

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
10 of 16
Ethyl trans-2-propyl-3-(O-Tolyl)-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3g): Compounds trans-3g and
cis-5g were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 99:1, from a 1-mmol-scale reaction. Only the
1
characteristic data of trans-3g are given. Colorless oil, yield 55% (171 mg). H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
7.72 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 4.82
(d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.40–4.32 (m, 1H), 4.32–4.25 (m, 1H), 3.33–3.20 (m, 1H),
2.86–2.75 (m, 1H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 1.66–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 162.4, 136.5, 134.2, 130.9, 128.8, 127.0, 126.0, 79.1, 63.1, 50.5, 48.5, 21.6, 19.2,
14.0, 11.6. IR (KBr):
HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H22NO4S [M + H]+: 312.1264; found: 312.1256.
ν .
2965, 2930, 2869, 1741, 1469, 1380, 1332, 1242, 1197, 1155, 1014, 752, 701 cm−1
Ethyl trans-2-propyl-3-(2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3h): Compounds
trans-3h and cis-5h were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 97:3, from a 1-mmol-scale
reaction. Only the characteristic data of trans-3h are given. Colorless oil, yield: 37% (135 mg). 1H-NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.09 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.51 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (d,
J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 4.40–4.33 (m, 1H), 4.33–4.26 (m, 1H), 3.36–3.23 (m, 1H), 2.96–2.82
(m, 1H), 1.62–1.48 (m, 2H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3):
161.6, 135.43 (q, J = 1.2 Hz), 133.0, 129.1, 128.75 (q, J = 30.8 Hz), 128.2, 126.05 (q, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 123.72
(q, J = 273.9 Hz), 80.3, 63.1, 49.2 (q, J = 2.3 Hz), 48.3, 21.4, 13.9, 11.5. IR (KBr):
ν 2974, 2929, 1747,
1453, 1312, 1267, 1164, 1119, 1036, 774 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H19F3NO4S [M + H]+: 366.0981;
found: 366.0977.
Ethyl trans-3-(2-methoxyphenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3i): Compounds
trans-3i and cis-5i were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 99:1, from a 1-mmol-scale
1
reaction. Only the characteristic data of trans-3i are given. Colorless oil, yield 78% (255 mg). H-NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.55 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.30 (m, 1H), 7.02 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.2 Hz,
1H), 4.84 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 4.41–4.33 (m, 1H), 4.34–4.25 (m, 1H), 3.81 (s, 3H),
3.38–3.25 (m, 1H), 2.91–2.80 (m, 1H), 1.75–1.55 (m, 2H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.97 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 162.4, 157.1, 130.0, 126.8, 124.5, 120.9, 110.6, 78.1, 62.6, 55.3, 49.14, 49.00,
21.7, 14.1, 11.6. IR (KBr):
HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H22NO5S [M + H]+: 328.1213; found: 328.1206.
ν .
2968, 2927, 2875, 1748, 1604, 1492, 1335, 1245, 1191, 1024, 755, 710 cm−1
Ethyl trans-3-(2fluorophenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3j): Compounds was
1
isolated from a 0.25-mmol-scale reaction. Pale yellow oil. Yield: 36% (27 mg). H-NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3)
(s, 2H), 4.47–4.27 (m, 2H), 3.37–3.25 (m, 1H), 2.93–2.80 (m, 1H), 1.71–1.54 (m, 2H), 1.36 (t, J = 7.1 Hz,
3H), 0.97 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3)
161.9, 160.79 (d, J = 249.1 Hz), 130.81 (d,
J = 8.2 Hz), 127.79 (d, J = 3.1 Hz), 124.92 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 123.35 (d, J = 12.4 Hz), 115.93 (d, J = 20.9 Hz),
δ 7.68 (td, J = 7.6, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.35 (m, 1H), 7.30–7.23 (m, 1H), 7.16–7.07 (m, 1H), 4.91
δ
78.2, 63.11, 48.7, 47.83, 47.80, 21.5, 14.0, 11.5. IR (KBr):
ν 2968, 2935, 2875, 1745, 1491, 1458, 1372, 1338,
1237, 1191, 1159, 1100, 1015, 763 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H18FNNaO4S [M + Na]+ 338.0833,
found 338.0839.
Ethyl trans-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3k): Compounds trans-3j
and cis-5j were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 97:3, from a 1-mmol-scale reaction.
Only the characteristic data of trans-3j are given. Colorless crystals, yield 68% (225 mg), M.p.: 51–59 ◦C
.
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.78 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.35–7.29 (m, 1H), 5.05 (d,
J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (d, J =5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.41–4.35 (m, 1H), 4.34–4.28 (m, 1H), 3.41–3.28 (m, 1H), 2.96–2.79
(m, 1H), 1.73–1.53 (m, 2H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3):
162.0, 134.2, 133.3, 130.2, 130.0, 127.68, 127.66, 78.9, 63.1, 50.4, 48.9, 21.6, 14.0, 11.6. IR (KBr):
ν 2962,
2933, 2869, 1741, 1475, 1469, 1341, 1187, 1040, 755, 701, 518 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H19ClNO4S
[M + H]+: 332.0718; found: 332.0713.
Ethyl trans-3-(2-bromophenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3l): Compounds trans-3k
and cis-5k were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 97:3, from a 1-mmol-scale reaction.

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
11 of 16
Only the characteristic data of trans-3k are given. Colorless crystals, yield: 70% (262 mg), M.p.:
76–81 ◦C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.82–7.77 (m, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.5 Hz,
1H), 7.24 (dd, J = 11.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 5.04 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.42–4.35 (m,
1H), 4.35–4.27 (m, 1H), 3.40–3.26 (m, 1H), 2.97–2.83 (m, 1H), 1.70–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H),
0.96 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H).
13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 162.0, 135.9, 133.3, 130.5, 128.3, 128.0, 123.0, 79.2,
63.1, 52.6, 48.7, 21.5, 14.0, 11.5; IR (KBr):
ν 2968, 2933, 2872, 1738, 1469, 1370, 1332, 1261, 1184, 1030, 758,
518 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H19BrNO4S [M + H]+: 376.0213; found: 376.0204.
Ethyl trans-3-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3m): Compounds
trans-3l and cis-5l were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 99:1, from a 1-mmol-scale
reaction. Only the characteristic data of trans-3l are given. Colorless crystals, yield 53% (193 mg), M.p.:
116–122 ◦C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.39 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.30–7.24 (m, 1H), 5.82 (d, J = 7.1 Hz,
1H), 5.52 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.40–4.34 (m, 1H), 4.32–4.25 (m, 1H), 3.32–3.25 (m, 1H), 2.81–2.74 (m, 1H),
1.54–1.41 (m, 2H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 162.3,
136.8, 130.8, 130.01, 129.96, 128.2, 128.1, 73.9, 63.1, 50.7, 48.9, 21.3, 14.0, 11.5. IR (KBr):
ν 2971, 2939,
2879, 1738, 1565, 1434, 1389, 1344, 1261, 1194, 1155, 1091, 1011, 774, 518 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for
C14H17Cl2NNaO4S [M + Na]+: 388.0148; found: 388.0371.
0
Ethyl trans-3-([1,1 -biphenyl]-2-yl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3n): Only compound
trans-3m was isolated from a 1-mmol-scale reaction, and the characteristic data are given as following.
1
Yellow oil, yield: 258 mg (69%). H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.85 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (dd, J = 11.0,
4.2 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.36 (m, 4H), 7.25–7.17 (m, 3H), 4.82 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 4.15 (q,
J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.21–3.05 (m, 1H), 2.78–2.71 (m, 1H), 1.55–1.42 (m, 2H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 0.88 (t,
J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 161.6, 142.7, 139.4, 133.9, 130.3, 129.3, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4,
127.7, 126.4, 79.6, 62.8, 50.3, 48.0, 21.5, 13.9, 11.5. IR (KBr):
ν 2962, 2933, 2869, 1735, 1601, 1482, 1364,
1332, 1258, 1191, 1001, 1011, 861, 752, 697, 521 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C20H24NO4S [M + H]+:
374.1421; found: 374.1430.
Ethyl trans-3-(naphthalen-2-Yl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3o): Only compound
trans-3n was isolated, and the characteristic data are given as following. Colorless crystals. Yield:
◦
147 mg (85%). M.p: 114–118 C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.96 (d, J = 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.5 Hz
,
1H), 7.89–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.65 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.58–7.49 (m, 2H), 4.90 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.72
(d, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.42–4.33 (m, 1H), 4.33–4.25 (m, 1H), 3.28 (ddd, J = 12.9, 8.2, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 2.86 (ddd,
J = 12.9, 8.2, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 1.68–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.93 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H)
(101 MHz, CDCl3): 162.3, 133.6, 133.2, 133.1, 129.4, 128.0, 127.8, 126.84, 126.83, 126.6, 123.4, 79.0, 63.1,
.
13C-NMR
54.4, 48.4, 21.6, 14.0, 11.6. IR (KBr):
ν 2969, 2920, 2870, 1735, 1469, 1332, 1194, 1162, 1024, 819, 745,
473 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C18H22NO4S [M + H]+: 348.1264; found 348.1274.
Ethyl trans-3-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3p): Compounds
trans-3o and cis-5o were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 75:25, from a 1-mmol-scale
reaction. Yellow oil, total yield 60% (232 mg). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.89 (s, 1H), 8.61 (d,
J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.44 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H), 4.84 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (q,
J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.49–3.35 (m, 1H), 3.05–2.89 (m, 1H), 1.63 (dq, J = 14.7, 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.37 (t, J = 7.1 Hz
,
3H), 0.99 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 161.8, 148.3, 148.2, 138.9, 130.6, 128.4,
120.7, 80.4, 63.6, 63.0, 50.0, 49.5, 21.6, 14.0, 11.5; IR (KBr):
ν 2965, 2933, 2872, 1741, 1607, 1540, 1466,
1348, 1258, 1184, 1002, 1009, 835, 796 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H18N3O8S [M + H]+: 388.0809;
found: 388.0802.
1
Ethyl cis-3-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (5p): H-NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): 9.02 (s, 1H), 8.61 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.71 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H),
4.99 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.17–4.08 (m, 1H), 4.09–3.99 (m, 1H), 3.49–3.36 (m, 1H), 2.86–2.75 (m, 1H),
1.81–1.69 (m, 2H), 1.19 (t, J = 7.1 Hz,3H), 1.06 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 161.4,
147.9, 147.7, 137.9, 131.7, 127.9, 120.7, 76.5, 63.6, 51.3, 49.8, 21.8, 13.8, 11.6. IR (KBr):
ν 2965, 2933, 2872,

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
12 of 16
1741, 1607, 1540, 1466, 1348, 1258, 1184, 1002, 1009, 835, 796 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C14H18N3O8S
[M + H]+: 388.0809; found: 388.0802.
Ethyl trans-3-(5-methoxy-2-nitrophenyl)-2-propyl-1,2-thiazetidine-4-carboxylate 1,1-dioxide (3q): Compounds
trans-3q and cis-5q were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 85:15, from a 0.25-mmol-scale
reaction. Colorless oil. Yield: 68% (63 mg).
NMR data for the trans-isomer: 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 8.18 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 2.7 Hz,
1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 9.1, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz,
2H), 3.97 (s, 3H), 3.52–3.39 (m, 1H), 3.06–2.94 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.59 (m, 2H), 1.38 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.03 (t,
J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 164.5, 162.5, 140.6, 135.8, 128.4, 114.4, 113.5, 80.5, 63.2,
56.1, 50.7, 49.3, 21.7, 14.0, 11.6.
1
NMR data for the cis-isomer: H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 8.26 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 2.7 Hz,
1H), 7.01 (dd, J = 9.1, 2.8 Hz, 1H), 5.65 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 5.00 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz,
2H), 3.97 (s, 3H), 3.47–3.36 (m, 1H), 2.82 (dt, J = 12.7, 7.9 Hz, 1H), 1.83–1.72 (m, 2H), 1.38 (t, J = 7.1 Hz,
3H), 1.03 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): 164.2, 161.4, 133.9, 128.3, 114.8, 114.4, 114.0,
76.1, 62.3, 56.1, 51.9, 49.6, 21.9, 13.7, 11.7.
IR (KBr):
ν 2968, 2939, 2875, 1747, 1612, 1581, 1517, 1484, 1466, 1370, 1340, 1288, 1240, 1230, 1182, 1085,
1033, 860, 848, 828, 754 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H20N2NaO7S [M + Na]+: 395.0883; found:
395.0885.
3.3. General Procedure for the Staudinger Cycloadditions of Ethyl Malonyl Chloride (1b)
To a solution of imine 2 (0.5 mmol) and 2-chloropyridne (113 µL, 1.2 mmol) in dry THF (3 mL)
was dropwise added a solution of ethyl malonyl chloride (1b) (0.181 g, 1.2 mmol) in dry THF (2 mL)
via a syringe for 3 min. Upon addition, the resulting mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature
for 12 h. Then ether (15 mL) and brine (10 mL) were added sequentially. After washing, the organic
phase was dried over MgSO4. Removal of the solvent and purification on silica gel chromatography
afforded the desired corresponding products trans-4 and cis-6.
Ethyl trans-4-(2-nitrophenyl)-1-propylazetidin-2-one-3-carboxylate (4d): Compounds trans-4d and cis-6d
1
were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 90:10. Yellowish oil. Yield 43% (65 mg). H-NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.14–8.08 (m, 1H), 7.77–7.71 (m, 1H), 7.60–7.52 (m, 2H), 5.31 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H),
4.40–4.33 (m, 1H), 4.33–4.26 (m, 1H), 3.79 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 3.72–3.61 (m, 1H), 2.96–2.88 (m, 1H),
1.69–1.57 (m, 2H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.00 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 166.6,
162.9, 148.3, 134.2, 133.2, 129.5, 126.7, 125.5, 63.7, 61.9, 54.1, 43.5, 20.8, 14.1, 11.2. IR (KBr):
ν 1770, 1731,
1526, 1349, 1190, 1041 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H19N2O5 [M + H]+: 307.1288; found 307.1294.
1
Ethyl cis-4-(2-nitrophenyl)-1-propylazetidin-2-one-3-carboxylate (6d): Yellowish oil. H-NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): 8.18 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.72–7.71 (m, 1H), 7.66–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.55–7.53 (m, 1H), 5.52 (d,
J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.72–3.61 (m, 1H), 3.03–2.97 (m, 1H),
1.70–1.58 (m, 2H), 0.94 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 4H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 165.4,
163.3, 147.8, 133.6, 131.6, 129.3, 128.7, 125.4, 61.1, 60.4, 54.2, 43.6, 20.6, 13.7, 11.5. IR (KBr):
ν 1770, 1731,
1526, 1349, 1190, 1041 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H19N2O5 [M + H]+: 307.1288; found 307.1288.
Ethyl trans-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1-propylazetidin-2-one-3-carboxylate (4r): Only the trans-4r was isolated,
and the characteristic data are given as following. Yellowish oil. Yield: 54% (82 mg). 1H-NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): 8.29–8.20 (m, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (dd, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.00 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H),
4.34–4.28 (m, 1H), 4.28–4.22 (m, 1H), 3.87 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 3.55–3.43 (m, 1H), 2.95–2.83 (m, 1H),
1.63–1.49 (m, 2H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.95 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 166.2,
161.9, 148.7, 139.1, 132.4, 130.3, 123.9, 121.7, 63.4, 62.0, 56.4, 43.0, 20.8, 14.0, 11.2. IR (KBr):
ν 1770,
1735, 1533, 1351, 1200, 1093, 1041, 1013 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C15H19N2O5 [M + H]+: 307.1288;
found 307.1288.

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
13 of 16
Ethyl trans-4-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-propylazetidin-2-one-3-carboxylate (4s): Only the trans-4s was isolated,
and the characteristic data are given as following. Known compound [47]. Colorless crystals, Yield: 58%
(95 mg). M.p.: 84–85 ◦C. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.28 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.54 (d, J = 8.6 Hz
,
2H, ArH), 4.98 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 3.53–3.43 (m, 1H),
2.91–2.84 (m, 1H), 1.62–1.49 (m, 2H), 1.32 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 0.94 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3): 166.3, 161.9, 148.3, 144.0, 127.5, 124.4, 63.4, 62.1, 56.4, 43.1, 20.9, 14.0, 11.3.
Ethyl trans-1-methyl-2-(2-nitrophenyl)-4-oxoazetidine-3-carboxylate (4a): Compounds trans-4a and cis-6a
were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 85:15. Yellowish oil. Total yield: 18% (28 mg).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.12 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (ddd, J = 7.6, 7.6, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.60–7.50
(m, 2H), 5.25 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.40–4.33 (m, 1H), 4.33–4.27 (m, 1H), 3.83 (d, J = 2.4, 1H), 2.97 (d,
J = 0.6 Hz, 3H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 166.5, 162.9, 145.4, 134.3, 133.0,
129.5, 126.5, 125.6, 64.3, 62.0, 56.3, 28.4, 14.1. IR (KBr):
ν .
1772, 1731, 1526, 1349, 1260, 1190, 1085 cm−1
HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H15N2O5 [M + H]+: 279.0975; found 279.0977.
1
Ethyl cis-1-methyl-2-(2-nitrophenyl)-4-oxoazetidine-3-carboxylate (6a): Yellowish oil. H-NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): 8.20 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.60–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.35–7.27 (m, 2H), 5.43 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H),
4.65 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.98 (s, 3H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). IR (KBr):
ν 1772,
1731, 1526, 1349, 1260, 1190, 1085 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C13H15N2O5 [M + H]+: 279.0975;
found 279.0977.
Ethyl trans-1-benzyl-2-(2-nitrophenyl)-4-oxoazetidine-3-carboxylate (4e): Compounds trans-4e and cis-6e
1
were isolated as a mixture, with a trans/cis ratio as 95:5. Yellowish oil. Yield 34% (60 mg). H-NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.07 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (td, J = 7.8, 0.9 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (ddd, J = 15.5, 8.2,
4.1 Hz, 2H), 7.35–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.26–7.21 (m, 2H), 5.16 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.02 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H),
4.38–4.31 (m, 1H), 4.31–4.24 (m, 1H), 4.05 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 1.32 (t, J = 7.2 Hz,
3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 166.3, 163.0, 148.1, 134.1, 134.0, 133.0, 129.4, 128.9, 128.2, 128.1, 126.7,
125.5, 64.0, 61.9, 54.1, 45.8, 20.9, 14.0. IR (KBr):
ν
1771, 1735, 1526, 1348, 1188 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd
for C19H19N2O5 [M + H]+: 355.1288; found 355.1294.
Ethyl trans-1-(tert-butyl)-2-(2-nitrophenyl)-4-oxoazetidine-3-carboxylate (4f): Yellowish oil. Yield 33% (51 mg).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.01 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.75–7.69 (m,
1H), 7.55–7.49 (m, 1H), 5.34 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.38–4.31 (m, 1H), 4.31–4.24 (m, 1H), 3.61 (d, J = 2.3 Hz,
1H), 1.34 (s, 9H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 166.6, 163.2, 148.2, 135.2, 133.7,
129.3, 127.3, 125.0, 62.7, 61.9, 55.4, 52.4, 27.8, 14.1. IR (KBr):
ν 1766, 1732, 1370, 1348, 1321, 1259, 1224,
1183 cm−1. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C16H21N2O5 [M + H]+: 321.1445; found 321.1452.
Ethyl cis-1-(tert-butyl)-2-(2-nitrophenyl)-4-oxoazetidine-3-carboxylate (6f): Yellowish oil. Yield 18% (22 mg).
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.08 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.72–7.66 (m,
1H), 7.56–7.48 (m, 1H), 5.58 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.48 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.35 (s,
10H), 0.87 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 165.4, 164.2, 148.2, 133.0, 132.9, 129.4, 129.3,
125.0, 61.1, 58.9, 55.4, 52.6, 27.8, 13.6. IR (KBr):
ν .
1766, 1734, 1371, 1348, 1322, 1259, 1223, 1183 cm−1
HRMS (ESI) calcd for C16H21N2O5 [M + H]+: 321.1445; found 321.1452.
Ethyl trans-1-(tert-butyl)-4-phenylazetidin-2-one-3-carboxylate (4t): Known compound [49]. Colorless
◦
1
crystals, yield 69% (95 mg); M.p.: 91–94 C. H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 7.41–7.32 (m, 5H, ArH),
4.85 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.234 (q, J = 7.2, 1H), 4.225 (q, J = 7.2, 1H), 3.69 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 1.29 (t,
J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.27 (s, 9H).
4. Conclusions
In conclusion, the ortho-nitro effect was discovered in sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions of
ethoxycarbonylsulfene with C-2-nitroarylimines, as well as in Staudinger cycloadditions of
ethoxycarbonylketene with C-2-nitroarylimines. When an ortho-nitro group is present at the C-aryl

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
14 of 16
substituents of linear imines, sulfa-Staudinger and Staudinger cycloadditions deliver the corresponding
cis- -sultams and cis- -lactams in considerable amounts, respectively, together with the corresponding
predominant trans- -sultams and trans- -lactams. In other cases without C-2-nitroarylimines,
the above sulfa-Staudinger and Staudinger cycloadditions produce trans- -sultams and trans- -lactams,
β
β
β
β
β
β
respectively, in excellent diastereoselectivities (trans/cis ratios from 97:3 to 100:0). Further mechanistic
rationalization discloses that the ortho-nitro effect is attributed to its strong electron-withdrawing
inductive effect rather than the steric hindrance of the 2-nitroaryl group and the electrostatic interaction
between the ortho-nitro group and the ethoxycarbonyl group. The current research provides further
insights into the diastereoselective control in sulfa-Staudinger and Staudinger cycloadditions.
Supplementary Materials: Copies of 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra of unknown products and 1H-NMR spectra
of representative crude reaction mixtures are included in the Supporting Information.
Acknowledgments: This work was supported in part by the National Basic Research Program of China
(No. 2013CB328905), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21372025 and 21172017), the BUCT
Fund for Disciplines Construction and Development (Project No. XK1533), and the China Postdoctoral Science
Foundation (No. 2016M600900).
Author Contributions: Jiaxi Xu conceived and designed the experiments; Zhanhui Yang and Hassane Abdellaoui
performed the experiments; Wei He performed the additional experiments during revision; Jiaxi Xu and Zhanhui
Yang analyzed the data; Jiaxi Xu and Zhanhui Yang wrote and revised the paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hudhomme, P. Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry III. In Four-Membered Rings with One Sulfur and One
Nitrogen Atom; Elsevier Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2008; Volume 2, pp. 729–759.
Chanet-Ray, J.; Vessiere, R. Synthesis and reactions of
[CrossRef]
β-sultams. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1986, 18, 157–178.
Otto, H.H.; Schwenkkraus, P. β-Sutams II: Synthesis of tri-, tetra- and pentamethylene-1,2-thiazetidine
1,1-dioxides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 5389–5390.
Cavagna, F.; Koller, W.; Linkies, A.; Rehling, H.; Reuschling, D. Synthese bicyclischer
1982, 94, 549–550. [CrossRef]
β-sultame. Angew. Chem.
Müller, M.; Otto, H.H. Properties and reactions of substituted 1,2-thiazetidine 1,1-dioxides: Acylation
of -sultams at C-4, reduction of 4-acyl- -sultams, and stereochemistry of 4-( -hydroxyalkyl)- -sultams.
Lieb. Ann. Chem. 1991, 1991, 171–178. [CrossRef]
β
β
α
β
6.
7.
8.
9.
Iwama, T.; Karaoka, A.; Muraoka, O.; Tanabe, G. A new synthesis of α-amino acid thioesters by Pummerer
reaction of 3-sbstituted-4-sulfinyl-β-sultams. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 63, 8355–8360. [CrossRef]
Iwama, T.; Karaoka, A.; Muraoka, O.; Tanabe, G. Reactions of 1,2-thiazetidine 1,1-dioxides with
organometallics: β-Elimination and N–S bond cleavage. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 5507–5522. [CrossRef]
Baxter, N.J.; Laws, A.P.; Rigoreau, L.J.H.; Page, M.I. General acid catalysed hydrolysis of β-sultams involves
nucleophilic catalysis. Chem. Commun. 1999, 23, 2401–2402. [CrossRef]
Page, M.I.
37, 297–303. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Page, M.I.; Tsang, W.Y.; Ahmed, N. Comparison of the mechanisms of reactions of
including their reactions with some serine enzymes. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2006, 19, 446–451. [CrossRef]
11. Tsang, W.Y.; Ahmed, N.; Hinchliffe, P.S.; Wood, J.M.; Harding, L.P.; Laws, A.P.; Page., M.I. Different
transition-state structures for the reactions of -lactams and analogous -sultams with serine -lactamases.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17556–17564. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Tsang, W.Y.; Ahmed, N.; Harding, L.P.; Hemming, K.; Laws, A.P.; Page, M.I. Acylation versus sulfonylation
in the inhibition of elastase by 3-oxo- -sultams. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8946–8947. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
β-Sultams mechanism of reactions and use as inhibitors of serine proteases. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004,
β-lactams and β-sultams,
β
β
β
β
13. Tsang, W.Y.; Ahmed, N.; Hemming, K.; Page, M.I. Reactivity and selectivity in the inhibition of elastase by
3-oxo-β-sultams and in their hydrolysis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 3993–4000. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Enders, D.; Wallert, S.; Runsink, J. Asymmetric synthesis of β-amino cyclohexyl sulfonates, β-sultams and
γ-sultones. Synthesis 2003, 12, 1856–1863. [CrossRef]

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
15 of 16
15. Paquette, L.A.; Barton, W.R.S.; Gallucci., J.C. Synthesis of 1-aza-8-thiabicyclo[4.2.1]nona-2,4-diene 8,8-dioxide
and its conversion to a strained spirocycle via photoinduced SO2
1313–1315. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Baldoli, C.; Del, B.P.; Perdicchia, D.; Pilati, T. Stereoselective synthesis of
arene)chromium(0) complexes. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 14089–14096. [CrossRef]
17. De Lewis, A.K.; Mok, B.J.; Tocher, D.A.; Wilden, J.D.; Caddick, S. New synthesis of
pentafluorophenyl sulfonates. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5513–5515. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
−
N bond cleavage. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
-sultams using chiral tricarbonyl( 6-
-sultams from
β
η
β
18. Staudinger, H.; Pfenninger, E. Über die einwirkung von schwefeldioxyd auf diphenyl-diazomethan.
Chem. Ber. 1916, 49, 1941–1951. [CrossRef]
19. Szymonifka, M.J.; Heck, J.V. The synthesis and reactions of 4-carbomethoxy β-sultams. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989,
30, 2869–2872. [CrossRef]
20. Grunder, E.; Leclerc, G. Synthesis of (
±
)-erythro o- and ( )-threo-1.2-diphenyltaurines by diasteroselective
±
hydrolysis of thiazetidine 1,1-dioxides. Synthesis 1989, 1989, 135–137. [CrossRef]
21. Grunder-Klotz, E.; Ehrhardt, J.-D. The 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl moiety as a new N-protecting group of
1,2-thiazetidine 1,1-dioxides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 751–752. [CrossRef]
22. Gordeev, M.F.; Gordon, E.M.; Patel, D.V. Solid-phase synthesis of
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
β-sultams. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8177–8181.
23. Zajac, M.; Peters, R. Catalytic asymmetric formation of
[PubMed]
β-sultams. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2007–2010. [CrossRef]
24. Zajac, M.; Peters, R. Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of
β-sultams as precursors for taurine derivatives.
Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 8204–8222. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Liu, J.; Hou, S.L.; Xu, J.X. Diverse reactions of sulfonyl chlorides and cyclic imines. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon
Relat. Elem. 2011, 186, 2377–2391. [CrossRef]
26. Yang, Z.H.; Xu., J.X. Insights into the
β-sultam ring formation in the sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions.
J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 10703–10708. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Yang, Z.H.; Chen, N.; Xu., J.X. Substituent-controlled annuloselectivity and stereoselectivity in the
sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 3611–3620. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Yang, Z.H.; Xu, J.X. Annuloselectivity and stereochemistry in the sulfa-Staudinger cycloadditions of cyclic
imines. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 78396–78405. [CrossRef]
29. Yang, Z.H.; Xu, J.X. Substituent effect on the diastereoselectivity in the sulfa-Staudinger cycloaddition.
Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 2844–2852. [CrossRef]
30. Wu, Q.Y.; Yang, Z.H.; Xu, J.X. Temperature-dependent annuloselectivity and stereochemistry in the reactions
of methanesulfonyl sulfene with imines. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 7258–7267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Yang, Z.H.; Li, S.Q.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, J.X. Base-switched annuloselectivity in the reactions of ethyl malonyl
chloride and imines. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 9822–9830. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Clark, L.W. The effect of aromatic nitro compounds on malonic acid. J. Phys. Chem. 1958, 62, 368–370. [CrossRef]
33. Terrier, F.; Xie, H.-Q.; Farrel, P.G. The effect of nitro-substitution upon diphenylmethane reactivity.
J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2610–2616. [CrossRef]
34. Font-Sanchis, E.; Aliaga, C.; Cornejo, R.; Scaiano, J.C. Reactivity toward oxygen of isobenzofuranyl radicals:
Effect of nitro group substitution. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1515–1518. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Franck, R.W.; Williamson, S.M.A. The shielding effect of the nitro group. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 2420–2422.
[CrossRef]
36. The cis- and trans-configurations of β-sultams or β-lactams are decided by the coupling constants between
the protons at C3 and C4 positions. Generally, J = 5–7 Hz for trans-β-sultams, and J = 8–9 Hz for cis-β-sultams;
J = 4–6 Hz for cis-β-lactams, and J = 0–3 Hz for trans-β-lactams.
37. Jiao, L.; Liang, Y.; Xu, J.X. Origin of the Relative Stereoselectivity of the
β-Lactam Formation in the Staudinger
Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6060–6069. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Tsuge, O.; Iwanami, S. Cycloaddition reactions of benzoylsulfene with anil. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1970, 43,
3543–3549. [CrossRef]
39. Zheng, Y.P.; Xu, J.X. Thorpe-Ingold effect and its application in cyclizations in organic chemistry. Prog. Chem.
2014, 26, 1471–1491.
40. Jung, M.E.; Piizzi, G. gem-Disubstituent effect: Theoretical basis and synthetic applications. Chem. Rev. 2005
,
105, 1735–1766. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Molecules 2017, 22, 784
16 of 16
41. Cossio, F.P.; Arrieta, A.; Sierra, M.A. The mechanism of the ketene-imine (Staudinger) reaction in its
centennial: Still an unsolved problem? Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 925–936. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Liang, Y.; Jiao, L.; Zhang, S.W.; Xu, J.X. Microwave- and photoirradiation-induced Staudinger reactions of
cyclic imines and ketenes generated from α-diazoketones. A further investigation into the stereochemical
process. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 334–337. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Li, B.N.; Wang, Y.K.; Du, D.-M.; Xu, J.X. Notable and obvious ketene substituent-dependent effect of
temperature on the stereoselectivity in the Staudinger reaction. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 990–997. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
44. Wang, Y.K.; Liang, Y.; Jiao, L.; Du, D.M.; Xu, J.X. Do reaction conditions affect the stereoselectivity in the
Staudinger reaction? J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6983–6990. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
45. Qi, H.Z.; Li, X.Y.; Xu, J.X. Stereoselective control in the Staudinger reactions involving monosubstituted
ketenes with electron acceptor substituents: experimental investigation and theoretical rationalization.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 2702–2714. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Wang, Z.X.; Chen, N.; Xu, J.X. Selectivities in the reaction of vicinal diimines and acyl chlorides. Tetrahedron
2011, 67, 9690–9699. [CrossRef]
47. Hu, L.B.; Wang, Y.K.; Li, B.N.; Du, D.M.; Xu, J.X. Diastereoselectivity in the Staudinger reaction: A useful
probe for investigation of nonthermal microwave effects. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9387–9392. [CrossRef]
48. Yang, Z.H.; Xu, J.X. Remarkable ketene substituent dependent effect of photo irradiation on the
diastereoselectivity in the Staudinger reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 786–789. [CrossRef]
49. Jiao, L.; Zhang, Q.F.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, S.W.; Xu, J.X. A versatile method for the synthesis of 3-alkoxycarbonyl
β-lactam derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 815–818. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 3, 4, 5, and 6 are available from the authors.
©
2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).