Table 2 The comparison of detonation properties of some energetic
compounds with 5a
concentrated under vacuum by evaporation (Attention:
although repeated washing with acetonitrile was performed,
the filter cake was spontaneously exploded while the partial
filter cake dried). The crude product obtained after the
removal of the solvent under vacuum was purified by silica
chromatography using 1 : 1 ethyl acetate: petroleum ether as
eluent to afford 0.65 g of 5, a light yellow solid (yield 67%,
ra
Qb
Dc
Pd
DfHm
Tdec
(1C)
e
f
Compd. (g cmꢀ3
)
(J gꢀ1
)
(km sꢀ1
)
(GPa) (kJ molꢀ1
)
5
1
2
3
1.482
1.620
1.774
1.80*g
5078.42 7.320
7.764
9.185
9.184
5390.75 7.840
6000.84 7.190
20.99 986.05
25.24 962.27
36.10 1030.00
39.00 1092.20
27.16 75.86i
21.72 69.75i
127.2
193.8
80.0
50.0 (mp)
1
entry 8, Table 1). H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): d 2.91
TATBh 1.790i
ppm (s, CH3). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): d 153.1,
9.1 ppm. IR: 2832 (vw), 1695 (m), 1542 (m), 1452 (m), 1385
(vs), 1094 (m), 1044 (m), 988 (m), 937 (m), 738 (m), 684 (m)
cmꢀ1. ESI-MS: m/z 193.00 [M-H]ꢀ. Anal. calcd for C4H6N10
(194): C, 24.74; H, 3.11; N, 72.14. Found: C, 24.76; H, 3.10; N,
72.13. Impact sensitivity and friction sensitivity: too sensitive
for measurement; electrostatic sensitivity discharge (ESD): 5 mJ.
Sodium dichloroisocyanurate (SDIC) as an oxidizing agent
(entry 1, Table 1): Acetic acid (0.5 mL) was added to a
solution of SDIC (2.2 g, 10 mmol) in water (4 mL) with
vigorous stirring at room temperature for 30 min. Then this
oxidizing suspension was added to a solution of 4 (0.99 g,
10 mmol) in 20 mL CH3CN. The reaction mixture was further
stirred at 0 1C for 30 min. The solution was neutralized with
solid Na2CO3, then filtered to remove insoluble solids. The
filter cake was washed several times with acetonitrile, and the
filtrate was concentrated. The crude product obtained after the
removal of the solvent under vacuum was purified by silica
chromatography using 1 : 1 ethyl acetate : petroleum ether as
eluent to afford 0.51 g of 5, a light yellow solid (yield 53%).
tert-Butyl hypochlorite as an oxidizing agent (entry 7,
Table 1): 4 (0.99 g, 10 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL CH3CN.
The solution was cooled at 0 1C and 1.1 mL (1.1 g, 10 mmol)
tert-butyl hypochlorite was added dropwise. The reaction
mixture was further stirred at 0 1C for 30 min. The solution
was neutralized with solid Na2CO3, then filtered to remove
insoluble solids. The filter cake was washed several times with
acetonitrile, and the filtrate was concentrated. The crude
product obtained after the removal of the solvent under
vacuum was purified by silica chromatography using 1 : 1 ethyl
acetate : petroleum ether as eluent to afford 0.57 g of 5, a light
yellow solid (yield 59%).
TNTh
1.650i
a
b
Calculated density from X-ray measurement. Heat of explosion.
c
d
Detonation velocity. Detonation pressure. Calculated molar
e
f
enthalpy of formation. Temperature of decomposition. Estimated.
h
g
TATB: 1,3,5-triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene; TNT: trinitrotoluene.
Ref. 13.
i
multinuclear spectroscopy. Theoretical study shows introduction
methyl at carbon atom of tetrazole ring of 5 decreases detonation
energy and density compared to the N10 compound 2. Never-
theless, the compound exhibits better thermal stabilities with
decomposition temperature of 127.2 1C and physical stability in
various solvents than that of 2.
Experimental
Syntheses
Caution: 1,10-Azobis(5-methyltetrazole) reported in this
publication is very sensitive towards friction, impact, and
electrostatic discharge. Therefore proper safety precautions
should be taken when handling these compounds. Laboratories
and personnel should be properly grounded, and safety equipment
such as Kevlar gloves, leather coats, face shields, and ear plugs are
strongly recommended.
Compound 4. To a mixture of 60 g (0.5 mole) of benzaldehyde
hydrazone, 39 g (0.6 mole) of NaN3, and 150 mL (0.9 mole) of
triethyl orthoacetate was added 250 mL of acetic acid with
stirring, and heated to 80 1C for 6 h. The reaction mixture was
then poured with stirring into 1.2 liters of water, and the
precipitate was removed by filtration and washed with water.
The precipitate was then treated with water (200 mL) and
100 mL of concentrated hydrochloric acid, and the benzaldehyde
was removed from the mixture by steam distillation. The
distillation residue was neutralized with aqueous ammonia
and evaporated under vacuum to remove water. The residue
was extracted with ethyl acetate, and the extract was dried over
MgSO4. Ethyl acetate was removed by evaporation under
vacuum to give 8 g of 5-methyl-1-aminotetrazole in the form
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation
of Jiangsu Province (BK2011696) and the ‘‘NJUST Research
Funding, No 2011YBXM03’’ of Nanjing University of Science
and Technology.
1
of a clear yellowish liquid (yield 16%). H NMR (500 MHz,
DMSO-d6, TMS): d 6.85 (s, 2H), 2.43 ppm (s, 3H). 13C NMR
(126 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): d 150.5, 7.4 ppm.
Notes and references
1 (a) G. Steinhauser and T. M. Klapotke, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
¨
2008, 47, 3330–3347; (b) T. Fendt, N. Fischer, T. M. Klapotke and
¨
J. Stierstorfer, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 1447–1458; (c) M. Gobel,
Compound 5. Trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCICA) as an
oxidizing agent (entry 8, Table 1): 4 (0.99 g, 10 mmol) was
dissolved in 20 mL CH3CN. The solution was cooled at 0 1C
and TCICA (4.65 g, 20 mmol) was added dropwise. The
reaction mixture was further stirred at 0 1C for 30 min. The
solution was neutralized with solid Na2CO3, then filtered to
remove insoluble solids. The filter cake was washed several
times with acetonitrile, and the combined filtrate was
¨
K. Karaghiosoff, T. M. Klapotke, D. G. Piercey and J. Stierstorfer,
¨
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 17216–17226; (d) R. Wang, Y. Guo,
Z. Zeng and J. M. Shreeve, Chem. Commun., 2009, 2697–2699.
2 (a) N. Fischer, D. Izsa
´
k, T. M. Klapotke, S. Rappengluck and
¨
¨
4051–4062;
J. Stierstorfer, Chem.–Eur. 18,
(b) A. A. Dippold, T. M. Klapotke, F. A. Martin and S. Wiedbrauk,
¨
J.,
2012,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2012, 2012, 2429–2443; (c) Y. Zhang, Y. Huang,
D. A. Parrish and J. M. Shreeve, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 6891–6897;
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2012
New J. Chem., 2012, 36, 2447–2450 2449