GModel
PRBI-9853; No. of Pages7
2
using poly(amido amine) (PAMAM) [24] or gelatin [25], prepara-
bilize the enzyme. There are a great variety of supports used for
the immobilization as Amberlite IR-120H beads [29], membranes
[30], oxidized carbon nanotubes and graphene oxides [31,32], sulfo
polyester resins [33], exchange resins [34], magnetic nanoparticles
[35–37]. Among all these methods, the recovered activity is differ-
ent depending on the immobilization protocol, but the stabilization
generally is moderated and lowly studied. Best reported examples
give stabilization around 10–15 fold better than soluble enzyme
[19,38].
Taking into account the low stability of the soluble enzyme and
necessity of obtaining more stable catalysts, in the present paper
the immobilization of a commercial laccase from T. versicolor using
aldehyde supports is proposed. The optimized catalyst in terms of
activity and stability will be used in the oxidation of some phenolic
compounds.
enzyme activity in order to avoid diffusion problems that could alter the apparent
activity and/or enzyme stability.
The immobilization on cyanogen bromide Sepharose was performed as in the
case of aldehyde supports. In this case immobilization was carried out at 4 ◦C and pH
7 during short times. In the indicated cases this derivative was aminated by adding
to 1 g of laccase derivative 10 mL of EDA (1 M) and of EDAC (10 mM) at pH 4.75
2.2.5. Stability of biocatalysts
Various preparations were incubated in different indicated conditions. Periodi-
cally, residual activity was determined as described above.
Inactivation was modeled based on the deactivation theory proposed by Henley
and Sadana [42]. Inactivation parameters were determined from the best-fit model
of the experimental data which was the one based on two-stage series inactiva-
tion mechanism with no residual activity. According to it, biocatalyst inactivation
proceeds through two sequential steps of progressively less active enzyme species
until a final completely inactive species is obtained, as represented in the following
scheme:
k
k
2
1
E−→ E1−→ E2
where k1 and k2 are first-order transition rates constants, E, E1 and E2 are the cor-
responding enzyme species. The mathematical model representing this mechanism
is
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢁꢁ
ꢀ ꢀ
ꢁꢁ
2. Materials and methods
k1
k1
·t)
·t)
exp(−k
2
exp(−k
−
˛
(1)
1
a = 1 + ˛
k2 − k1
k2 − k1
2.1. Materials
where ˛ represents the residual activity at time t and ˛ is the ratio of specific activity
of enzyme species E1 with respect of that of the native enzyme species E.
Considering only one step mechanism of enzyme inactivation (k2 = 0), and resid-
ual activity (˛ =/ 0), the model is first order inactivation with residual activity,
represented by
Laccase from T. versicolor (2.2 IU mg−1), 2,2ꢀ-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzathiazoline-
6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), ethylene diamine (EDA), sodium borohydride, sodium meta-
periodate, ethanolamine, glycidol (2,3-epoxypropanol), 2,6-dichloro-indophenol,
pyrogallol and catechol and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide
(EDAC) were supplied by Sigma Chem. Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sepharose 10BCL
supports and cyanogen bromide (CNBr) activated Sepharose were supplied by GE
Healthcare (Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). Cellulose dialysis tubes (cut-off
12–14 KDa) were from Spectrum Labs (Breda, The Netherlands). Other reagents were
always of analytical degree.
+ ˛
(2)
Inactivation parameters were determined from the best-fit model of the experi-
mental data. Half-life (time at which the residual enzyme activity is half of its initial
value; t1/2) was used to compare the stability of the different biocatalysts, being
determined by interpolation from the respective models described by Eq. (1) or Eq.
(2).
2.2. Methods
2.2.6. Oxidation of different compounds
In all cases the experiments were performed in triplicate and the maximal error
was never higher than 5%.
Commercial enzyme (0.02 mg) or 0.04 g of the most stable immobilized deriva-
tive (5 mg of enzyme per gram of support) was added to 1 mL of a solution at pH 7
or 4.5 of different compounds (2,6-dichloro-indophenol, pyrogallol and catechol).
In order to measure the activity with the different substrates, derivatives with
low load of enzyme were used again. In all cases activity was expressed as mol of
product min−1 mg−1 of immobilized enzyme. At different times, aliquots of solution
were taken and the absorbance measured. Supports were previously saturated with
different substrates to avoid possible absorptions. Molar extinction coefficients (ε)
were: 12,097 M−1 cm−1 at pH 7 measured at 600 nm and 12,109 M−1 cm−1 at pH
4.5 at 520 nm for 2,6-dichloro-indophenol; 928 M−1 cm−1 (at pH 7 and 4.5) mea-
sured at 450 nm for o-benzoquinone, oxidation product from catechol; and finally
4283 and 3724 M−1 cm−1 at pH 7 and 4.5, respectively, and measured at 420 nm
for purpurogallin that is the oxidation product of pyrogallol as previously described
[43,44].
2.2.1. Enzyme assay
Standard laccase activity was determined by oxidation of ABTS at 25 ◦C [39].
The substrate solution was composed by 2 mL of ABTS (3 mM) in sodium acetate
buffer (10 mM at pH 4.5). Then a suitable amount of soluble enzyme or immobilized
preparation was added and the oxidation of ABTS was followed by measuring the
increase of the absorbance at 418 nm in a 1 cm path length spectrophotometric cell
(εABTS = 36,000 M−1 cm−1). One international unit (IU) of laccase activity corresponds
to the oxidation of 1 mol ABTS per minute under these conditions.
2.2.2. Chemical amination of laccase
A mixture composed by a T. versicolor laccase solution (1 mL with 1 IU mL−1),
5 mL of 1 M ethylene diamine (EDA) at pH 4.75 and 0.012 g of solid 1-ethyl-3-(3-
dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDAC) was performed. After 90 min of gentle
stirring at 4 ◦C, the solution was dialyzed 5 times against 50 volumes of distilled
water and stored at 4 ◦C [40].
2.2.7. Reuse of the derivatives
In order to assess the operational stability of the most stable preparations, sev-
using ABTS (3 mM) as substrate in sodium acetate buffer (10 mM at pH 4.5) at 418 nm
and 25 ◦ C. After each cycle, the immobilized preparation (20 IU/mL) was washed
three times with 5 volumes of acetate buffer (10 mM at pH 4.5).
2.2.3. Preparation of the supports
Cyanogen bromide Sepharose was hydrated as suggested by the supplier (1 g dry
support was suspended in 10 mL of water at pH 2–3 and stirred for 30 min. Then, sup-
port was dried under vacuum before being used for the immobilization). Sepharose
aldehyde supports were activated and oxidized as was previously described [41].
2.2.8. Determination of the enzyme structure
Enzyme structure was extracted from Protein Data Bank (PDB file: 1gyc). Model-
ing was performed using the program Pymol Molecular Graphics System. Amination
of the structure was simulated using this program considering a total amination of
carboxylic moieties.
2.2.4. Immobilization of the enzyme
A laccase solution (9 mL with 1 IU mL−1 or the correspondent amount in the max-
imal load of enzyme experiments) in sodium bicarbonate (0.1 M) at the indicated pH
(9 or 10) was added to 1 g of aldehyde-Sepharose. At different times, samples of the
supernatant and suspensions were taken and the activity was assayed. When the
immobilization process was completed, the different preparations were incubated
at the indicated pH (9 or 10) during 3 h. Then, 10 mg of solid NaBH4 were added
in a single addition and left under stirring during 30 min. Finally the support was
washed with water.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Immobilization of the enzyme on aldehyde supports
Immobilization yield was referred to the percentage of enzyme activity that
disappeared from the enzyme solution compared with the activity of a blank solution
without support.
Expressed activity was calculated as the ratio between the final activity after
incubation at different pHs of the immobilized enzyme and the immobilized enzyme
activity measured at the optimal pH. All experiments were performed using a low
As it was commented above, the availability of a heterogeneous
and strongly stable biocatalyst is key for use at industrial scale.
Thus, laccase was offered to an aldehyde support for its immobi-
lization. The immobilization on aldehyde supports is performed by
a multipoint mechanism [41]. Therefore, incubation at alkaline pH
Please cite this article in press as: Addorisio V, et al. Oxidation of phenyl compounds using strongly stable immobilized-stabilized laccase from