Molecules 2021, 26, 3244
8 of 11
1
For
1
(C H F O N S La), H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d ):
δ
13.59 (s, 1H, -NH),
55
33
9
6
5
3
6
9.05–8.91 (t, 4H, -phenyl, and -pyridyl), 8.17 (d, 2H, -phenyl), 7.83 (m, 8H, -phenyl, -thienyl
and -pyridyl), 7.38 (m, 4H, -phenyl, -thienyl and -pyridyl), 7.15–7.12 (m, 11H, -phenyl,
−
1
-
1
9
5
5
thienyl and -pyridyl), 6.17 (s, 3H, -CH=C-). FT-IR (KBr, cm ): 1599 (s), 1536 (s), 1481(m),
454(m), 1411 (s),1355 (w),1298 (vs), 1246 (w),1229 (w), 1186 (s), 1137 (s), 1078 (w), 1061 (w),
33 (w), 859 (w), 842 (w), 786 (m), 767 (w), 718 (w), 696 (m), 680 (w), 640 (m), 604 (w),
79 (m), 520 (w). The elemental analysis (%) calculated for C H F O N S La was C,
55
33
9
6
5 3
+
+
2.18; H, 2.63; N, 5.53. C, 52.21; H, 2.49; N, 5.60. MS (ESI ): m/z: 1288.97(100%), [M + Na]
was found. The yield was 60%.
For
(C H F O N S Eu), FT-IR (KBr, cm 1): 1594 (s), 1537 (s), 1505 (m), 1454 (m),
410 (s),1354 (w),1306 (vs), 1247 (w),1229 (w), 1181(s), 1135 (s), 1076 (w), 1062 (w), 933 (w),
60 (w), 842 (w), 788 (m), 768 (w), 719 (w), 696 (m), 683 (w), 640 (m), 605 (w), 579 (m),
21 (w). The elemental analysis (%) calculated for C H F O N S Eu was C, 51.65; H,
−
2
55
33
9
6
5 3
1
8
5
2
5
5
33
9
6
5 3
+
+
.60; N, 5.48. C, 51.62; H, 2.59; N, 5.46. MS (ESI ): m/z: 1302.05(100%), [M + Na] was
found. The yield was 63%.
For
(C H F O N S Tb), FT-IR (KBr, cm 1): 1594 (s), 1537 (s), 1505 (m), 1454 (m),
410 (s),1354 (w),1306 (vs), 1247 (w),1229 (w), 1181(s), 1135 (s), 1076 (w), 1062 (w), 933 (w),
60 (w), 842 (w), 788 (m), 768 (w), 719 (w), 696 (m), 683 (w), 640 (m), 605 (w), 579 (m),
21 (w). The elemental analysis (%) calculated for C H F O N S Tb was C, 51.37; H,
−
3
55
33
9
6
5 3
1
8
5
2
5
5
33
9
6
5 3
+
+
.59; N, 5.45. C, 51.29; H, 2.52; N, 5.39. MS (ESI ): m/z: 1308.99(100%), [M + Na] was
found. The yield was 65%.
For
(C H F O N S Gd), FT-IR (KBr, cm 1): 1598 (s), 1538 (s), 1480 (m), 1454 (m),
411 (s),1355 (w), 1304 (vs), 1247 (w),1230 (w), 1188 (s), 1137 (s), 1078 (w), 1062 (w), 934 (w),
60 (w), 842 (w), 787 (m), 768 (w), 718 (w), 695 (m), 681 (w), 641 (m), 605 (w), 581 (m),
21 (w). The elemental analysis (%) calculated for C H F O N S Gd was C, 51.44; H,
−
4
55
33
9
6
5 3
1
8
5
2
5
5
33
9
6
5 3
+
+
.59; N, 5.45. C, 51.42; H, 2.53; N, 5.39. MS (ESI ): m/z: 1307.32 (100%), [M + Na] was
found. The yield was 61%.
4
. Conclusions
L
3+
In summary, a purity-red emitter (x = 0.638, y = 0.323;
Φ
= 38.9%) of Eu -complex
Eu
was synthesized, which showed color tunable emissions that ranged from red, white,
to bluish green under the different excitation wavelengths and various amounts of TEA
stimulations. Relying on the changeable color emission, we successfully designed the
dual-input/dual-output logic gate for the visual detection of toxic TEA in a solution, which
expands the research applications of lanthanide Eu3+ luminescent materials.
1
Supplementary Materials: The following are available online. Figure S1 Partial H NMR spectra of
PHD, DPPI and complex 1. Figure S2 FT-IR spectrum of DPPI. Figure S3 FT-IR spectra of complexes
1–4. Figure S4 ESI mass spectrum of DPPI. Figure S5 ESI mass spectrum of complex 2. Figure S6
UV-visible absorption spectra of complexes 2–4, the ligand HTTA and DPPI. Figure S7 Emission and
3
+
excitation spectra of complex 4 at 77 K. Figure S8 Energy transfer process from DPPI ligand to Eu
or Tb3+ in complexes 2–3. Figure S9 TG curves of 2 and DPPI. Figure S10 Fluorescent photographs of
complex 2 under Sunlight and UV light. Figure S11 UV-visible absorption spectra changes of complex
2
. Figure S12 UV-visible absorption spectra changes of complex 2 with the stimulation of acetic acid
−
5
(
0.1 mM) in DMSO solution (10 M) at RT. Figure S13 Emission spectra of complex 2 by different
excitation wavelengths (λex = 290 to 410 nm) in DMSO solution without TEA. Figure S14 Excitation
spectra of complex 2 monitored at 495 nm and 613 nm with the simulation of TEA in solution at
1
room temperature. Figure S15 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d ) of complex 1 with the addition of TEA
6
(
0.1 mM). Table S1 Photophysical properties of complex monomers 2–4, HTTA and DPPI. Table S2
White light emission index parameters.
Author Contributions: Contributions: B.-N.L.; data curation, B.-N.L. and M.P.; formal analysis,
M.P.; funding acquisition, Y.-Y.L. and Y.-P.W.; investigation, B.-N.L.; methodology, M.P.; project
administration, M.P.; supervision, B.-N.L.; Y.-Y.L.; Y.-P.W.; M.P.; validation, B.-N.L.; visualization,
B.-N.L. and M.P.; writing—original draft, B.-N.L. and Y.-Y.L.; writing—review and editing. All
authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.