1838
A. Dandia et al. / Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 125 (2004) 1835–1840
Table 3
Spectral data of compouds IIIa–b & IVa–f
Compound
IR (cmÀ1
)
1H NMR (d, ppm)
19F NMR (d, ppm)
À64.21 (s, CF3)
IIIa
3365–3395 (2 Â NH), 3060, 2940, 2850
(aromatic and aliphatic C–H), 1700,
1680 (2 Â C=O), 1490 (NO2)
d 4.22 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 6.90–8.35
(m, 13H, Ar–H), 8.92 & 9.25(2 Â bs,
2 Â 1H, 2x NH exchangeable with D2O)
d 4.26 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 6.98–8.26
IIIb
IVa
IVb
IVc
IVd
IVe
IVf
3360–3400 (2 Â NH), 3060, 2955,
2860 (aromatic and aliphatic C–H),1700,
1685 (2 Â C=O), 680, 720.
À119.90 (s,2-F)
À63.38 (s, CF3)
À119.61 (s, 3-F)
À63.21 (s, CF3)
–64.45 (s, CF3)
À119.61 (s,2-F)
À118.88 (s,4-F)
(m, 13H, Ar–H), 8.95 & 9.22 (2 Â bs,
2 Â 1H, 2x NH exchangeable with D2O)
d 3.96 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 6.88–7.19
3050, 2940, 2840 (aromatic and aliphatic
C–H), 1700 (C=O), 1605 (C=N)
(m, 5H, Phenyl ring protons of CH2Ph),
7.22–8.18 (m, 7H, Ar–H), 8.40 (dd, 1H, 5-H).
d 3.95 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 6.84–7.10
3050, 2980, 2860 (aromatic and aliphatic
C–H), 1695 (C=O), 1605 (C=N)
(m, 5H, Phenyl ring protons of CH2Ph),
7.19–8.14 (m, 7H, Ar–H), 8.39 (dd, 1H, 5-H).
d 3.98 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 6.86–7.12
3040, 2970, 2860 (aromatic and aliphatic
C–H), 1705 (C=O), 1608 (C=N)
(m, 5H, Phenyl ring protons of CH2Ph),
7.25–8.15 (m, 6H, Ar–H), 8.38 (dd, 1H, 5-H).
d 3.95 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 6.82–7.15
3040, 2970, 2860 (aromatic and aliphatic
C–H), 1700 (C=O), 1608 (C=N)
(m, 5H, Phenyl ring protons of CH2Ph),
7.31–8.25 (m, 7H, Ar–H), 8.45 (dd, 1H, 5-H).
d 3.96 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 6.85–7.18
3050, 2980, 2850 (aromatic and aliphatic
C–H), 1700 (C=O), 1610 (C=N)
(m, 5H, Phenyl ring protons of CH2Ph),
7.21–8.10 (m, 7H, Ar–H), 8.40 (dd, 1H, 5-H).
3.97 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 6.88–7.19
3060, 2980, 2860 (aromatic and aliphatic
C–H), 1700 (C=O), 1615 (C=N)
(m, 5H, Phenyl ring protons of CH2Ph),
7.10–8.10 (m, 7H, Ar–H), 8.39 (dd, 1H, 5-H).
are given in Table 3. In the mass spectrum of representative
compounds the molecular ion peak at m/z 398 and 380
(100%) was corresponding to the molecular weight of
compounds IIIa and IVd, respectively.
flasks and sterilized. To this medium, a requisite quantity of
solution was added and then the medium was poured into
petri plates in three replication. A culture of test fungus was
grown on PDA for 6–7 days. Small disc (4 mm) of fungus
culture was cut with a sterile corkborer and transferred
asceptically, upside-down in the center of petridishes con-
taining the medium and fungicides. Plates were incubated at
25 Æ 1 8C for 6 days. Colony diameter were measured and
data was statistically analysed (Table 4).
2.1. Evaluation of anti-fungal activity
The synthesized compounds were screened for antifungal
activity against three pathogenic fungi, namely Rhizoctonia
solani, causing root rot of okra, Fusarium oxysporum,
causing wilt of mustard and Colletotrichum capsici causing
leaf spot and fruit rot of chilli. It was done by two methods.
2.3. Pot trial method [20]
White seeded sorghum grains were soaked in water for
about 12 h, 160 g of the soaked kernels were placed in
500 ml flasks and 20 ml of water was added to each. The
material was autoclaved twice on successive days before
inoculation. After sterilization, fungus bits were inoculated
in each flask and flasks were kept for 10 days at 25–27 8C.
2.2. Poison plate technique [19]
The compounds synthesized were dissolved in acetone
and compounds were prepared in 1000 and 500 ppm con-
centrations. Potato-dextrose-agar medium was prepared in
Table 4
Effect of concentrations of different chemicals on the mean radial growth (cms) of different fungus in vitro
Compound no.
Rhizoctonia solani
Fusarium oxysporum
Colletotrichum capsici
1000 ppm
500 ppm
1000 ppm
500 ppm
1000 ppm
500 ppm
IVa
IVb
IVc
IVd
IVe
1.08a
2.58
1.83
2.08
6.67
1.92
9.00
1.22
1.75
1.50a
2.58
7.67
8.25
3.83
9.00
1.02
1.58
1.60
2.25
2.92
1.08a
1.25
8.17
0.77
1.83
3.92
4.25
5.00
1.67
1.58a
8.17
1.14
1.33
2.58
1.75
1.50
0.75a
2.50
7.33
1.03
2.17
3.67
3.25
3.50
1.25a
4.08
7.33
1.08
IVf
Check
CD 1%
a
Minimum value.