Mendeleev Commun., 2016, 26, 129–130
PtL(m-Cl)] . The latter were treated with DMSO to afford the Table 1 Spectroscopic data of ligands 2 and complexes 3 in acetonitrile.
2
[
intermediate monomeric complexes PtL(DMSO)Cl, which were
converted directly (without purification) into complexes 3a and
Compound
labs/nm
lem/nma
Stokes shift/nm
3
b on treatment with an excess of sodium acetylacetonate in
2a
2b
3a
3b
295, 335
502
508
584
579
167
173
204
202
acetone (Scheme 1).
296, 335
1
The structures of 2a,b and 3a,b were studied by H NMR
spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The formation of com-
plexes 3a,b resulted in the disappearance of a one-proton signal
of the thiophene ring and caused downfield shifts for the H(8)
resonance signal of the quinazoline system. Moreover, the
characteristic resonances of the acetylacetonate CH proton at
314, 355, 380
314, 354, 377
a
Excitation at 335 nm for 2a,b and at 380 nm for 3a,b.
5
.57–5.58 ppm and the signals of two methyl groups were
1
Pt(1)
observed in the H NMR spectra. Molecular ion peaks in the
mass spectra of complexes 3a,b were recorded. An excellent
correlation between experimental and calculated picks in the
mass spectra of 3a,b has been found (see Figures S6 and S8,
Online Supplementary Materials).
3
.573 Å
Pt(1)
†
According to the XRD data, compound 3a is crystallized in the
centrosymmetric space group. The Pt ion has a typical distorted
squared coordination. Bond lengths in the Pt chelate indicate at a
strong conjugation in the 1,3-dicarbonyl system. As a result of
the CH···O contact between C(9) an O(1) atoms (Figure 1), the
benzene ring of the quinazoline system is turned toward the
Pt(1)O(1)O(2)N(1)C(12) plane at an angle of 21°. In crystals, two
molecules proved to form dimers on the twofold axes with the
interatomic distance Pt···Pt [1–x, y, 0.5–z] of 3.57 Å (Figure 2),
which suggests the presence of Pt–Pt interaction in the crystal state.
Figure 2 Dimer 3a formation in a crystal.
In conclusion, the cyclometallated platinum(ii) complexes
[Pt(L)(acac)] with quinazolines have been prepared, and the
spectroscopic data of quinazoline ligands 2 and their Pt com-
plexes 3 have been compared. Further studies for the synthesis of
new luminescent materials based on ligands 2 are in progress.
ii
Pt complexes 3 exhibit the long-wave shift of emission
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for
Basic Research (grant no. 14-03-00340), the Ural Branch of
the Russian Academy of Sciences (project no. 15-21-3-7) and
the Council of the President of the Russian Federation (grant
no. NSh-3656.2014.3).
maximum compared to the starting ligands 2 (Table 1). Upon
photoexcitation at the lowest energy band, the complexes and
ligands were found to exhibit low-intensity luminescence with a
large Stokes shift. The maxima in photoluminescence spectra of
the complexes are red-shifted with respect to those observed for
the ligand precursors.
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2016.03.015.
C(8)
C(22)
C(7)
C(23)
C(9)
C(6)
O(1)
Pt(1)
References
C(10)
C(24)
O(2)
C(17)
N(16)
C(5)
1 (a) M. Thelakkat and H. W. Schmidt, Polym. Adv. Technol., 1998, 9,
429; (b) C. W. Tang and S. A. Vanslyke, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1987, 51, 913.
2 (a) B. Wieczorek, B. Lemcke, H. P. Dijkstra, M. R. Egmond, R. J. M. K.
Gebbink and G. van Koten, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2010, 1929; (b) A. F.
Suleymanova, D. N. Kozhevnikov and A. M. Prokhorov, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2012, 53, 5293.
C(25)
C(26)
C(18)
N(1)
C(4)
N(3)
O(3)
C(2)
C(11)
C(12)
C(20)
C(21)
C(13)
3
4
5
L. Armelao, S. Quici, F. Barigelletti, G. Accorsi, G. Bottaro, M. Cavazzini
and E. Tondello, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254, 487.
J. Brooks, Y. Babayan, S. Lamansky, P. I. Djurovich, I. Tsyba, R. Bau
and M. E. Thompson, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41, 3055.
D. N. Kozhevnikov, V. N. Kozhevnikov, M. M. Ustinova, A. Santoro,
D. W. Bruce, B. Koenig, R. Czerwieniec, T. Fischer, M. Zabel and H.Yersin,
Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 4179.
G. N. Lipunova, E. V. Nosova, V. N. Charushin and O. N. Chupakhin,
Comments Inorg. Chem., 2014, 34 (5-6), 142.
K. L. Garner, L. F. Parkes, J. D. Piper and J. A. G. Williams, Inorg.
Chem., 2010, 49, 476.
S(15)
C(14)
Figure 1 Molecular structure of 3a in the thermal ellipsoids of 50%
probability.
†
Crystal data for 3a. The single crystal (red prism, 0.13×0.09×0.04 mm)
of compound 3a (C H N O PtS) was used for X-ray analysis. Analysis
was performed at 295(2) K on an Xcalibur E diffractometer using graphite
monochromated MoKa radiation (l = 71.073 pm) and a CCD detector.
An empirical absorption correction was applied (m = 7.086 mm ). Crystal
is orthorhombic, space group Pbcn with a = 17.3907(5), b = 15.1103(4) and
c = 15.3554(5) Å, V = 4035.1(2) Å , Z = 8. On the angles 2.34 < q < 30.74°
4909 reflections were measured, among them 5654 unique reflections
Rint = 0.0518), 3282 reflections with I > 2s(I). Completeness to q = 26.00°
is 99.95%. The structure was solved by a direct method and refined by
full-matrix least squares at F using the SHELXTL program package.
All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically; the positions of the
hydrogen atoms were calculated as a riding model in isotropic approxi-
6
7
8
21
21
3
3
–
1
G. Gong, Y. Xie, Y. Liu, A. Rinderspacher, S. X. Deng, Y. Feng, Z. Zhu,
Y. Tang, M. Wyler, N. Aulner, U. Toebben, D. H. Smith, L. Branden,
C. Chung, S. Schürer, D. Vidovi c´ and D. W. Landry, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 2009, 19, 1191.
3
1
(
9 J. J. Marugan, W. Zheng, O. Motabar, N. Southall, E. Goldin, W. Westbroek,
B. K. Stubblefield, E. Sidransky, R. A. Aungst, W. A. Lea, A. Simeonov,
W. Leister and C. P. Austin, J. Med. Chem., 2011, 54, 1033.
0 A. V. Gulevskaya, B. U. W. Maes, C. Meyers, W. A. Herrebout and B. J.
van der Velen, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2006, 5305.
2
12
1
2
mation. Goodness to fit at F 1.007; final R values [I > 2s(I)], R = 0.0422,
11 D. N. Kozhevnikov, V. N. Kozhevnikov, M. Z. Shafikov, A. M. Prokhorov,
D. W. Bruce and J. A. G. Williams, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 3804.
12 G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr., 2008, A64, 112.
1
wR = 0.0623; R value (all reflections) R = 0.0990, wR = 0.0742. Largest
2
1
2
–3
difference peak and hole were 1.020 and –0.616 eÅ .
CCDC 1439844 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for
this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
Received: 7th September 2015; Com. 15/4725
–
130 –