10.1002/cmdc.202100263
ChemMedChem
FULL PAPER
Acknowledgements
PGE2 level
Viability
This work was supported by a grant for the development of
research organization (Institute of Organic Chemistry and
Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, RVO: 61388963) and
by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (TE01020028).
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Author Information
Corresponding Author
*Z.J.: email, janeba@uochb.cas.cz
*Z.Z.: email, zdenek.zidek@iem.cas.cz
ORCID
Zlatko Janeba: 0000-0003-4654-679X
Filip Kalčic: 0000-0002-4391-8319
Figure 4. Effect of prepared compounds on in vitro production of PGE2 and on
viability of mouse peritoneal cells (interval of 6 h). Effects are expressed as a
percentage change relative to the response of LPS stimulated (100%, positive
control) or unstimulated (2.5%, negative control) cells. Bars are means ± SEM
obtained by averaging results of two to four experiments for each compound.
PC – positive control, NC – negative control.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Keywords: solubility • anti-inflammatory • pyrimidines •
prostaglandin E2 • synthesis
Conclusion
[1]
H. D. Williams, N. L. Trevaskis, S. A. Charman, R. M. Shanker, W. N.
Charman, C. W. Pouton, C. J. H. Porter, Pharmacol. Rev. Pharmacol Rev 2013,
65, 315–499.
The structure of 5-butyl-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-6-phenylpyrimidin-
2-amine (1), a potent inhibitor of PGE2 production with anti-
inflammatory properties, was modified in order to increase its poor
water-solubility. A series of compounds was designed and
synthesized, where the lipophilic n-butyl substituent in the C5
position of pyrimidine moiety of compound 1 was replaced with
more hydrophilic substituent, preferably an aliphatic chain. Except
for 5-cyanopyrimidine 4 (which had a similar solubility as 1), all
target compound proved to be more water-soluble. Compounds
13 and 14, bearing two and three PEG units in the C5 position,
respectively, were identified as the most promising compounds
within the series: compound 13 was the most water-soluble
derivative (almost 2 orders of magnitude more water-soluble than
1), but it was considerably (4-fold) less potent inhibitor of PGE2
production than compound 1; compound 14, on the other hand,
was the second most water-soluble derivative (32-fold more
soluble compared to 1), with only slightly weaker (1.5-fold)
potency compared to 1, thus exhibiting relatively favorable
potency/solubility ratio. An analogous transformation of 5-
butylpyrimidine 16 into compound 17 (with three PEG units in the
C5 position of pyrimidine) led to a 1 order of magnitude higher
water-solubility compared to parent compound 16, however, it
also led to considerable decrease of potency to inhibit PGE2
production. Currently, other methods how to increase water-
solubility and to keep or increase the potency of parent compound
1 or its derivatives are being investigated.
[2]
J. Kujawski, M. K. Bernard, A. Janusz, W. Kuźma, J. Chem. Educ. 2012,
89, 64–67.
[3]
[4]
V. J. Stella, K. W. Nti-Addae, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 677–694.
D. Fleisher, R. Bong, B. H. Stewart, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1996, 19, 115–
130.
[5]
T. Heimbach, D. M. Oh, L. Y. Li, M. Forsberg, J. Savolainen, J. Leppänen,
Y. Matsunaga, G. Flynn, D. Fleisher, Pharm. Res. 2003, 20, 848–856.
A. T. M. Serajuddin, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, 59, 603–616.
N. A. Meanwell, J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 2529–2591.
P. Jansa, A. Holý, M. Dračínský, V. Kolman, Z. Janeba, P. Kostecká, E.
Kmoníčková, Z. Zídek, Med. Chem. Res. 2014, 23, 4482–4490.
P. Jansa, A. Holý, M. Dračínský, V. Kolman, Z. Janeba, E. Kmoníčková,
Z. Zídek, Med. Chem. Res. 2015, 24, 2154–2166.
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10] Z. Zídek, M. Kverka, A. Dusilová, E. Kmoníčková, P. Jansa, Nitric Oxide
2016, 57, 48–56.
[11] V. Kolman, P. Jansa, F. Kalčic, Z. Janeba, Z. Zídek, Nitric Oxide 2017,
67, 53–57.
[12] V. Kolman, F. Kalčic, P. Jansa, Z. Zídek, Z. Janeba, Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2018, 156, 295–301.
[13] F. Kalčic, V. Kolman, H. Ajani, Z. Zídek, Z. Janeba, ChemMedChem
2020, 15, 1398–1407.
[14] P. Dosoudil, V. Kotek, V. Kolman, O. Baszczyňski, M. M. Kaiser, Z.
Janeba, M. Havránek, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2020, 24, 1718–1724.
[15] V. Kolman, F. Kalčic, Z. Janeba, Z. Zídek, Polysubstituted Pyrimidines
as Inhibitors of Prostaglandin E2 Production, Methods of Preparation and
Application, 2019, 309052.
[16] VCCLAB, Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory. 2005.
[17] M. M. V. Ramana, Amey Nimkar, R. Betkar, P. Ranade, B. Mundhe, New
J. Chem. 2016, 40, 2541–2546.
[18] P. G. M. Wuts, Greene´s Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, Wiley,
Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA, 2014.
Experimental Section
[19] B. Bourrie, P. Casellas, P. Ciapetti, J.-M. Deroco, S. Jegham, Y.
Muneaux, C.-G. Wermuth, 6-Substituted Pyridoindolone Derivatives,
Production and Therapeutic Use Thereof, 2007, US2007/129365 A1.
[20] T. D. Penning, J. J. Talley, S. R. Bertenshaw, J. S. Carter, P. W. Collins,
S. Docter, M. J. Graneto, L. F. Lee, J. W. Malecha, J. M. Miyashiro, R. S.
Rogers, D. J. Rogier, S. S. Yu, G. D. Anderson, E. G. Burton, J. N.
Cogburn, S. A. Gregory, C. M. Koboldt, W. E. Perkins, K. Seibert, A. W.
Veenhuizen, Y. Y. Zhang, P. C. Isakson, J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1347–
1365.
See Supporting Information for general experimental information, standard
procedures, spectral data, characterization, calculated log P values,
solubility measurements details, calibration curves, PGE2 assay, viability
assay, and copies of spectra of the prepared compounds.
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.