Fayad et al.: TEE AND ATRIO-FEMORAL BYPASS
1083
65–75 mmHg. During aortic cross clamping, LAFB
flow was increased to over 3 L·min–1, but subsequent-
ly adjusted to between 2.5–3.5 L·min–1, based on the
TEE visualization of left ventricular cavity size.
In summary, TEE was used to confirm correct posi-
tioning of the left atrial cannula. The hazards of can-
nula malposition include poor flow rates to the distal
organs during TAA repair, and left atrium trauma or
rupture. TEE was useful to monitor the left ventricu-
lar volume and to adjust the LAFB flow rate. In this
case, TEE proved to be a useful adjunct for the man-
agement of LAFB during TAA repair.
Discussion
In this patient, TEE played a key role in confirming
the correct position of the left atrial cannula and in
monitoring left ventricular volume status.
TAA surgery carries high mortality and morbidity
rates but, over the last ten years, the mortality rate has
decreased to about 10%.7, A The use of LAFB has been
reported to decrease the incidence of neurologic
deficits and renal failure.8,9, B
TAA repair can be performed by clamping the
proximal aorta and suturing expeditiously. This
approach relies on surgical speed to limit ischemia.
Another approach utilizes the shunting of blood
through a conduit inserted between proximal and dis-
tal aorta in an attempt to maintain spinal cord, renal,
and lower extremity perfusion. A third approach uti-
lizes extracorporeal circulation. This involves clamp-
ing the aorta and circulating blood to the lower body
via femoral-femoral bypass or LAFB.10,11
In this patient, the LAFB technique was used. Flow
rates generated to the lower part of the body during
LAFB are dependent upon left atial volume, cardiac
output and distal vascular resistance. Native cardiac
output maintains perfusion to the upper body. The
LAFB flow rate determines the amount of blood
diverted and the left atrial volume or pressure may no
longer reflect the LVEDV. Consequently, pulmonary
arterial occlusion pressure may no longer reflect
LVEDV. If the LAFB flow rate is high and significant
volume is diverted from the left atrium, LVEDV may
be compromised, as may perfusion to the upper body.
During surgery, significant blood loss and third space
fluid shifts also occur. The need to distinguish hypov-
olemia from a LAFB-induced LV underfilling as the
cause for upper body hypotension becomes a clinical
challenge. Intraoperative TEE is unique in its ability
to provide continuous monitoring of left ventricular
function and filling. In fact TEE currently is the only
monitor capable of monitoring the size of the left ven-
tricular cavity (LVEDV) in this situation.
References
1 Money SR, Hollier LH. The Management of thoracoab-
dominal aneurysms: advances in surgery. 1994; 27:
285–7.
2 Cina CS, Irvine KPA, Jones DK. A modified technique
of atriofemoral bypass for visceral and distal aortic per-
fusion in thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Ann Vasc
Surg 1999; 13: 560–5.
3 Cina CS, Bruin G. Acute normovolemic hemodilution
(ANH) in surgery of the thoraco-abdominal aorta. A
cohort study to evaluate coagulation parameters and
blood products utilization. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)
1999; 40: 37–43.
4 Huemer G, Wohlrab C, Greher M. Transesophageal
echocardiography and volume management in the
intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 1998; 53(Suppl 2):
8–10.
5 Clements FM, Harpole DH, Quill T, Jones RH,
McCann RL. Estimation of left ventricular volume and
ejection fraction by two-dimensional transesophageal
echocardiography: comparison of short axis imaging
and simultaneous radionuclide angiography. Br J
Anaesth 1990; 64: 331–6.
6 Troianos CA, Porembka DT. Assessment of left ventric-
ular function and hemodynamics with transesophageal
echocardiography. Crit Care Clin 1996; 12: 253–72.
7 Safi HJ. Role of the BioMedicus pump and distal aor-
tic perfusion in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm
repair. Artificial Organs 1996; 20: 694–9.
8 O’Connor CJ, Rothenberg DM. Anesthetic considera-
tions for descending thoracic aortic surgery: part I. J
Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995; 9: 581–8.
9 O’Connor CJ, Rothenberg DM. Anesthetic considera-
tions for descending thoracic aortic surgery: part II. J
Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995; 9: 734–47.
10 Coselli JS. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: experi-
ence with 372 patients. J Card Surg 1994; 9: 638–47.
11 Fehrenbacher JW, McCready RA, Hormuth DA, et al.
One-stage segmental resection of extensive thoracoab-
dominal aneurysms with left-sided heart bypass. J Vasc
Surg 1993; 18: 366–71.
A
Cina CS, Lagana A, Jones DK, Irvine KPA, Clase CM.
A meta-analysis of surgical strategies for repair of thoracoab-
dominal aortic aneurysm. Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery
Annual Meeting, Ottawa, Ontario, October 19–21, 2001.
B
Cina CS, Lagana A, Bruin G, et al. Thoracoabdominal
aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective cohort study of 121 cases.
Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery Annual Meeting, Banff,
Alberta, September 29–30, 2000.