is found in cells in which the copper transporter CTR1 is over
expressed.
1 F. E. Hahn and M. Jahnke, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 3122–
3172.
2 O. Schuster, L. R. Yang, H. G. Raubenheimer and M. Albrecht, Chem.
Rev., 2009, 109, 3445–3478.
3 L. Mercs and M. Albrecht, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 1903–
1912.
4 M.-L. Teyssot, A.-S. Jarrousse, M. Manin, A. Chevry, S. Roche, F.
Norre, C. Beaudoin, L. Morel, D. Boyer, R. Mahiou and A. Gautier,
Dalton Trans., 2009, 6894–6902.
5 I. Ott, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2009, 253, 1670–1681.
6 C. G. Hartinger and P. J. Dyson, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 391–
401.
Therefore, such “NHNH” NHCs may find applications in
biomedical applications as water soluble delocalised cations or
in supramolecular assemblies as hydrogen bond directing units.
Overall the work illustrates a simple and efficient route towards
water soluble metal complexes of “NHNH” NHCs. Currently, we
are exploring the scope of this reaction.
We acknowledge the support of Dr R. Linder with the fluores-
cence spectroscopy.
7 H. G. Raubenheimer and S. Cronje, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 1998–
2011.
8 J. Hickey, R. Ruhayel, P. J. Barnard, M. V. Baker, S. J. Berners-Price
and A. Filipovska, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 12570–12571.
9 P. J. Barnard and S. J. Berners-Price, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2007, 251,
1889–1902.
Notes and references
‡ Syntheses: [(C8H14N2O2)2Au]Cl (1): a solution of n-butyl lithium in
hexane (1.6 M, 1.25 mL, 2.0 mmol) was added to a solution of
1-diethoxymethylimidazole (0.34 g, 2.0 mmol) in THF (50 mL) at
-78 ◦C. The solution was kept at -78 ◦C, after 45 min a solution of
[(tht)AuCl] (0.32 g, 1.0 mmol) in THF (5 mL) and after further 30 min
CF3SO3H (0.18 mL, 2.0 mmol) were added. The solution was slowly
warmed to ambient temperature. A precipitate formed after a few minutes,
which was collected by filtration, washed with diethyl ether, dried in vacuo
and recrystallised from methanol–CH2Cl2. Yield 0.41 g (72%). Crystals
suitable for single crystal structure analysis were grown by slow evaporation
of a solution of 1 in methanol. 1H NMR (methanol-d4) d/ppm: 1.25 (t, J =
7.1 Hz, 12 H, OCH2CH3), 3.57 (m, 8 H, OCH2CH3), 6.61 (s, 2 H, CH),
7.35 (d, J = 2 Hz, 2 H, Him), 7.57 (d, J = 2 Hz, 2 H, Him). MALDI-TOF
(MeOH): m/z = 537 [M - Cl]+, 435 [M - Cl - CH(OEt)2]+, 333 [M -
Cl - 2CH(OEt)2]+. ESI+ (MeOH): m/z = 333.5 [M - Cl - 2CH(OEt)2]+.
C16H28N4AuClO4·CH2Cl2 (656.77): calcd C 32.21, H 4.75, N 9.11; found
C 32.49, H 4.82, N 9.20. Crystal data of 1. C16H27AuClN4O4 M = 571.83
10 P. J. Barnard, M. V. Baker, S. J. Berners-Price and D. A. Day, J. Inorg.
Biochem., 2004, 98, 1642–1647.
11 H. G. Raubenheimer, P. J. Oliver, L. Lindeque, M. Desmet, J. Hrusak
and G. J. Kruger, J. Organomet. Chem., 1997, 544, 91–100.
12 H. G. Raubenheimer, L. Lindeque and S. Cronje, J. Organomet. Chem.,
1996, 511, 177–184.
13 G. E. Dobereiner, C. A. Chamberlin, N. D. Schley and R. H. Crabtree,
Organometallics, 2010, 29, 5728–5731.
14 A. Flores-Figueroa, T. Pape, K.-O. Feldmann and F. E. Hahn, Chem.
Commun., 2010, 46, 324–326.
15 N. Meier, F. E. Hahn, T. Pape, C. Siering and S. R. Waldvogel,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2007, 1210–1214.
16 F. E. Hahn, V. Langenhahn, N. Meier, T. Lu¨gger and W. P. Fehlhammer,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2003, 9, 704–712.
17 R. Tonner, G. Heydenrych and G. Frenking, Chem.–Asian J., 2007, 2,
1555–1567.
˚
g/mol, monoclinic, a = 7.4555(3), b = 13.2831(8), c = 22.2966(7) A, b =
◦
3
˚
18 G. Frenking, M. Sola˛ and S. Vyboishchikov, J. Organomet. Chem.,
96.996(3) , V = 2191.64(18) A , T = 183 K, space group P21/n, Z = 4,
2005, 690, 6178–6204.
12 129 reflections measured, 4842 unique (Rint = 0.0375). The final wR was
0.0657 (I > 2s(I)) and wR2 was 0.1290 (all data).
19 D. Nemcsok, K. Wichmann and G. Frenking, Organometallics, 2004,
23, 3640–3646.
[(C3H4N2)2Au]Cl (2): a suspension of 1 (0.35 g, 0.6 mmol) in 15 mL
hydrochloric acid (3.5 M) was heated to reflux for 5 h. All volatiles
were removed in vacuo to give 2 as a white micro-crystalline solid in
quantitative yield. Crystals suitable for single crystal structure analysis
were grown by slow diffusion of diethyl ether into a solution of 2 in
methanol. Yield 0.21 g (93%). 1H NMR (methanol-d4): d/ppm: 7.35
(pseudo t, 4 H, Him), 12.58 (s, br, 4 H, NH). MALDI-TOF (MeOH):
m/z = 332.86 [(C3N2H4)2Au]+. ESI+ (MeOH): m/z = 333.5 [M - Cl]+,
283.1 [(C3H4N2)Au(H2O)]+. C6H8N4AuCl·H2O (386.59): calcd C 18.64,
H 2.61, N 14.49; found C 18.97, H 2.77, N 14.55. Crystal data of
2. C6H8AuClN4 M = 368.59 g/mol, monoclinic, a = 8.51512(18), b =
20 C. Boehme and G. Frenking, Organometallics, 1998, 17, 5801–5809.
21 H. Jacobsen, A. Correa, A. Poater and C. Costabile, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2009, 253, 687–703.
22 H. Jacobsen, A. Correa, C. Costabile and L. Cavallo, J. Organomet.
Chem., 2006, 691, 4350–4358.
23 H. Jacobsen, J. Organomet. Chem., 2005, 690, 6068–6078.
24 G. Sini, O. Eisenstein and R. H. Crabtree, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 41,
602–604.
25 M. V. Baker, P. J. Barnard, S. J. Berners-Price, S. K. Brayshaw, J. L.
Hickey, B. W. Skelton and A. H. White, Dalton Trans., 2006, 3708–
3715.
◦
3
˚
˚
14.1757(2), c = 23.3727(5) A, b = 97.774(2) , V = 2795.35(9) A , T =
183 K, space group C2/c, Z = 12, 24 088 reflections measured, 6769 unique
(Rint = 0.0338). The final wR was 0.0279 (I > 2s(I)) and wR2 was 0.0642
(all data).
26 A. Rit, T. Pape and F. E. Hahn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 4572–
4573.
27 H. Schmidbaur and A. Schier, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 1931–1951.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 35–37 | 37
©