.
Angewandte
Communications
constitute the newly formed carbonyl groups of the benzo-
furan system originate from O2 and TEMPO, respectively.
Our initial investigations began with the reaction of 1-
(phenylethynyl)-2-(vinyloxy)benzene (1a) with air, TEMPO,
and tBuONO for reaction optimization (Table 1). Treatment
reaction with respect to a range of 1-ethynyl-2-(vinyloxy)-
benzenes 1 (Table 2). Gratifyingly, both electron-donating
(2b–g and 2o) and electron-withdrawing (2h–n) aromatic
substituents were tolerated at the terminal alkyne. Moreover,
even with bulky ortho-substituted aryl groups, the carbony-
lated benzofurans were furnished in good yields (2c, 2 f, 2g,
and 2k), although these substrates were less reactive than
their para- or meta-substituted counterparts. For example,
whereas para-methyl-substituted 1,6-enyne 1b afforded 2b in
76% yield, ortho-methyl-substituted 1,6-enyne 1c was con-
verted into 2c in 71% yield. For methoxy-substituted 1,6-
enynes 1d–f, the reactivity decreased from para to meta to
ortho substitution (2d–f). Notably, substrates with strongly
electron-withdrawing cyano and acetyl groups also delivered
the carbonylated benzofurans 2m and 2n in good yields.
Halide substituents (I, Br, Cl, and F) were well tolerated
under these oxidative conditions (2h–l), and may serve as
handles for further synthetic manipulations. 1,6-Enyne 1o,
which bears two methyl groups, and 1,6-enyne 1p, which
features a naphthalen-1-yl group, afforded benzofurans 2o
and 2p in 75% and 59% yield, respectively. We were pleased
to find that heteroaryl-substituted alkynes 1q–s were also
suitable substrates and allowed the formation of 2q–s in
moderate to high yields. Furthermore, the optimized reaction
conditions were applicable to 1,6-enyne 1t, which bears an
alkyl group at the terminal alkyne (2t). Subsequently,
representative 1,6-enynes were selected to illustrate the
tolerance for substituents on the aryl ring of the 1-(vinyl-
oxy)benzene moiety (2u–w). The substrate with an electron-
donating methyl group afforded benzofuran 2u in 57% yield,
whereas with an electron-withdrawing CN substituent, ben-
zofuran 2v was obtained in 80% yield at 808C. We were
pleased to find that 2w, with a polycyclic ring system, was
furnished in 75% yield.[2d,e] However, internal alkenes 1x and
1y did not react under the current cyclization conditions
[Eq. (1)].
Table 1: Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]
Entry
tBuONO
[equiv]
TEMPO
[equiv]
Solvent
T [8C]
Yield[b] [%]
1
2
3
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
DMF
DMF
DMF
MeCN
EtOAc
toluene
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
RT
RT
RT
RT
RT
RT
40
60
40
40
40
65
0
0
3[c]
4
48
38
18
73
71
73
trace
71
5
6
7[d]
8
9[e]
10[f]
11[g]
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), tBuONO, TEMPO, air (1 atm),
solvent (2 mL), 8 h. [b] Yield of isolated product. [c] Another product, (2-
(nitromethyl)benzofuran-3-yl)(phenyl)methanone (4a), was isolated in
23% yield together with >50% yield of 1a. [d] Product 3 was isolated in
70% yield based on the amount of TEMPO used. [e] Under O2
atmosphere (1 atm). [f] Under argon atmosphere (1 atm) and in
degassed solvent. [g] 1a (1 g, 4.5 mmol), 24 h.
of 1,6-enyne 1a with air, TEMP,O and tBuONO in DMF at
room temperature for eight hours afforded the desired 3-
benzoylbenzofuran-2-carbaldehyde (2a) in 65% yield
(entry 1). However, in the absence of either TEMPO or
tBuONO, the reaction did not result in the formation of
detectable amounts of 2a (entries 2 and 3). Without TEMPO,
the nitration/cyclization product (2-(nitromethyl)benzofuran-
3-yl)(phenyl)methanone (4a) was isolated in 23% yield
(entry 3). Three other solvents, namely MeCN, EtOAc, and
toluene, effected the reaction but were inferior to DMF
(entries 4–6). Screening the effect of the reaction temperature
revealed that higher temperatures were favorable, and 408C
was found to be the preferred temperature (entries 1, 7, and
8). Notably, the reaction at 408C gave 2a in 73% yield, while
TEMPO was converted into 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-nitrosopi-
peridine (3) in 70% yield (entry 7). When varying the
amounts of TEMPO and tBuONO, we found that the reaction
with three equivalents of TEMPO and tBuONO gave the best
results (entry 7; see also the Supporting information,
Table S1).[11] The yield under O2 atmosphere was identical
to that under air (entry 9), but the reaction was completely
suppressed by using argon and degassed solvent (entry 10).
The reaction with one gram of substrate 1a gave the desired
product in good yield (entry 11).
To elucidate the mechanism, some control experiments,
including 18O-labeling experiments, were conducted.[11] As
expected, an 18O atom was introduced into the ketonic
carbonyl group under 18O2 atmosphere (1 atm) as determined
by GC-MS and 13C NMR analysis (Scheme 2a). However,
according to GC-MS and 13C NMR analysis, 18O atoms were
not incorporated into the carbonyl groups in the presence of
H218O (5 equiv) and anhydrous DMF (Scheme 2a). Notably,
the results in Table 1 show that during the reaction, TEMPO
is converted into 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-nitrosopiperidine (3).
These results imply that the oxygen atom of the aldehydic
carbonyl group originates from TEMPO. Substrate 5 was
subjected to the reaction with air, TEMPO, and tBuONO, but
the desired product 2a was not observed (Scheme 2b).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we next
investigated the generality of this metal-free cyclization
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!