Mendeleev Commun., 2020, 30, 765–767
OH
Me
CHO
i or ii
OH
+
HN
Cl
1
O
–
CH2OH
CHO
O
HO
∙HCl
O
OH
Me
OH
i or ii or iii
HO
OH
OH
O
OEt
HN+
O
Me
O
Me
–
O
Cl
O
+
HN +
O
O
O
HN+
HO
–
Me
–
6
Cl
7
Cl
3
+
HN
Cl
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: i, 2 (2 equiv.), EtOH (abs.), TsOH
(cat.), 78 °C, 3 h, 98%; ii, 2 (2 equiv.), EtOH (abs.), without catalyst, 78 °C,
CH2OH
–
O
O
3
h, 90%; iii, 2 (2 equiv.), EtOH (abs.), piperidine (cat.), 78 °C, 3 h, 86%.
5
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, 2 (1 equiv.), EtOH (abs.), 78 °C,
structure was assigned on the basis of MALDI mass spectrometry
and H NMR spectroscopy data.
1
1
0 h, yield of 5 46%, yield of 3 54%; ii, 2 (2 equiv.), EtOH (abs.), 78 °C,
0 h, yield of 5 67%, 3 is not formed.
1
To conclude, a preparative synthesis of novel hybrid
hetarylfuropyridines and chromenes containing furopyridine,
coumarin and phenol fragments in the molecule has been
accomplished.
the hydroxyl groups of coumarin and pyridine. The structure of
this compound was confirmed by MALDI mass spectrometry,
H NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and X-ray analysis
1
data (Figure 1).
According to X-ray data, compound 5 crystallizes in
monoclinic space group C2/c and there is one independent
molecule of compound 5 and Cl-counterion at axis 2, as well as
DMSO solvent molecule in the unit cell. The bond lengths
are within the range of standard values for this type of
The authors are grateful to the Collective Spectral-Analytical
Center of Physicochemical Studies of Structure, Properties, and
Composition of Substances and Materials of the Federal
Research Center Kazan Scientific Center of RAS for technical
support of the studies. X-ray studies were performed using the
equipment of the Federal Research Center Kazan Scientific
Center of RAS.
bonds.
A
six-membered oxygen-containing heterocycle
adopts ‘C(9)-sofa’
O(20)C(3)C(4)C(9)C(10)C(19)
a
conformation; five-atomic fragment C(4)C(3)O(20)C(19)C(10)
is planar within the range of 0.085 Å and C(9) atom deviates at
Online Supplementary Materials
0
.129(6) Å from the plane. Other heterocycles are planar within
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi: 10.1016/j.mencom.2020.11.025.
†
the experimental measurement error.
At the next stage of this study, 4-hydroxycoumarin 2 was
4
reacted with previously prepared polycyclic aldehyde 6 based
References
on pyridoxal and 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde (Scheme 3). The
application of TsOH as the catalyst provided the highest yield of
chromene derivative 7 being a 2:1 adduct of 2/6 reactants. Its
1
A. Müller-Schiffmann, H. Sticht and C. Korth, BioDrugs, 2012, 26, 21.
2 H. Cerecetto and M. González, in Bioactive Heterocycles IV, Topics in
Heterocyclic Chemistry, ed. M. T. H. Han, Springer, Berlin, 2007,
pp. 265–308.
3
E. A. Chugunova and A. R. Burilov, Curr. Top. Med. Chem., 2017, 17,
Cꢀꢃꢆꢂ
Cꢀꢃꢇꢂ
986.
Cꢀꢃꢁꢂ
4 L. K. Kibardina, A. V. Trifonov, A. R. Burilov, A. S. Gazizov and
M. A. Pudovik, Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 2018, 88, 1832 (Zh. Obshch.
Khim., 2018, 88, 1486).
5 L. K. Kibardina, A. V. Trifonov, A. B. Dobrynin, M. A. Pudovik and
A. R. Burilov, Mendeleev Commun., 2018, 28, 551.
Cꢀꢃꢅꢂ
Oꢀꢃ2ꢂ
Cꢀꢃꢄꢂ
Oꢀ20ꢂ
Cꢀꢅꢁꢂ
Cꢀ2ꢂ
6
L. K. Kibardina, A. V. Trifonov, A. R. Burilov and M. A. Pudovik, Russ.
J. Gen. Chem., 2018, 88, 1818 (Zh. Obshch. Khim., 2018, 88, 1472).
Nꢀꢃꢂ
Cꢀꢆꢂ
Oꢀꢁꢃꢂ
Cꢀꢈꢂ
Oꢀ2ꢁꢂ
7 I. Manolov, S. Raleva, P. Genova, A. Savov, L. Froloshka, D. Dundarova
and R. Argirova, Bioinorg. Chem. Appl., 2006, 71938.
8 I. Manolov, C. Maichle-Moessmer, I. Nicolova and N. Danchev,
Arch. Pharm., 2006, 339, 319.
Cꢀꢇꢂ Cꢀꢅꢃꢂ
Oꢀꢅ2ꢂ
Oꢀꢉꢂ
Cꢀꢅ0ꢂ
Sꢀꢁ0ꢂ
Cꢀ2ꢆꢂ
9
K. M. Khan, S. Iqbal, M. A. Lodhi, G. M. Maharvi, M. I. Zia-Ullah,
Atta-ur-Rahman, M. I. Choudhary and S. Perveen, Bioorg. Med.
Chem., 2004, 12, 1963.
Cꢀ2ꢉꢂ
Figure 1 Molecular structure of compound 5.
10 J. Lehmann, Lancet, 1943, 241, 611.
†
Crystal data for 5. 2(C H NO ) ∙ 2(C H OS) ∙ Cl (M = 1102.52),
The structure of 5 was solved by the direct methods and refined using
SHELX.25 Non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically.
Hydrogen atoms were calculated on idealized positions and refined as
2
6
17
7
2
6
monoclinic, space group C2/c at 294 K: a = 25.553(4), b = 13.0547(19)
and c = 16.853(2) Å, b = 101.570(7)°, V = 5507.7(14) Å , Z = 4,
3
–
3
–1
26
dcalc = 1.330 g cm ; μ(MoKa) = 0.216 mm ; F(000) = 2292. Total of
6001 reflections were collected (5409 independent reflections with
riding atoms. All calculations were performed using WinGX.
3
Intermolecular interactions were analyzed using the program
2
7
q < 26°, Rint = 0.110) and used in the refinement, which converged to
wR 0.3743, GOOF 1.21 for all independent reflections [R = 0.1048
PLATON. All the figures were produced by the MERCURY
program.28 Bad experimental data from crystal of compound 6 are due
to a weakly reflecting crystal.
2
1
was calculated for 2780 reflections with I ³ 2s(I)]. X-ray diffraction
analysis was performed at room temperature on a Bruker Kappa Apex
II CCD automatic diffractometer using graphite monochromated
MoKa (0.71073 Å) radiation and w-scan rotation. Data collection:
images were indexed, integrated, and scaled using the APEX22
data reduction package and corrected for absorption using SADABS.24
CCDC 2018191 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for
this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
Detailed synthesis procedures and characteristics of compounds 4, 5, 7
are presented in Online Supplementary Materials.
3
–
766 –