M.H. Chisholm et al. / Polyhedron 64 (2013) 339–345
341
incorporated in the WINGX package [18]. For each methyl group, the
hydrogen atoms were added at calculated positions using a riding
model with U(H) = 1.5Ueq (bonded carbon atom). The rest of the
hydrogen atoms were included in the model at calculated positions
using a riding model with U(H) = 1.2Ueq (bonded atom). Neutral
atom scattering factors were used and include terms for anoma-
lous dispersion [19].
benzene (20 mL) and THF (5 mL). The solution went from yellow
to dark ruby red. The THF was removed in vacuo and the precipitate
was washed with copious amounts of hexanes to yield an orange-
brown solid. The solid was filtered and recrystallized from THF to
yield orange crystals. (Yield 86%) NMR (THF-d
(d, 8H, JHH = 8.5 Hz), 7.26 (t, 16H, JHH = 7.3 Hz), 7.11 (d, 16H,
HH = 8.0 Hz), 7.04 (m, 16H). UV–Vis (THF, 293 K) 448, 328 nm.
8
, 400 MHz): 8.11
J
i
Several supporting isopropyl groups on the T PB moiety as well
2 2 6 4 2 4
MALDI-TOF: Found: 1345.5 m/z. Mo [O CC H N(Ph) ] Requires:
as the axially coordinated THF molecules were disordered and
modeled appropriately. A detailed discussion of their refinement
can be found embedded in the accompanying CIF.
1348.22 m/z.
3
. Results and discussion
2.7. EPR studies
3.1. Syntheses
EPR measurements were carried out at X-band (9.5 GHz). The
spectra were obtained using a Bruker EMX + EPR spectrometer.
The samples were prepared by partially oxidizing approximately
i
The compounds trans-M
2
(T PB)
2
(O
2
CC
6
H
4
-4-NPh
2
)
2
where
i
M = Mo or W and T PB = 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzoate, were prepared
from the reaction between the homoleptic compounds M
and 2 equivalents of the carboxylic acid Ph N-4-C CO H in tolu-
i
2 4
(T PB)
1
0 mg of compounds I–III in a 5 mL solution of THF with a trace
. The samples were enclosed in a thin
2
H
6 4
2
amount (ꢀ2 mg) of AgPF
6
ene. The compounds I (M = Mo) and II (M = W) precipitated from
solution during the reaction and were collected by centrifugation.
The microcrystalline powders were washed with toluene and
hexanes and dried under a dynamic vacuum. Compound I is yellow
and compound II is purple. Both compounds are soluble in THF and
are air-sensitive. Crystals of I were grown by layering a saturated
THF solution with hexanes. All reactions and procedures involved
the use of an argon atmosphere with dried and degassed solvents.
EPR tube sealed with a Kontes top. All samples were run at room
temperature.
2
.8. Syntheses
N,N-diphenyl-4-aminobenzoic acid was prepared according to
literature protocols by Vilsmeier formylation of triphenylamine
[
20] followed by oxidation of the monoaldehyde with potassium
i
i
The homoleptic compound Mo (O CC H -4-NPh ) was prepared
from the reaction between Mo(CO)
permanganate [21]. Mo
2
(T PB)
4
[22] and W
2
(T PB)
4
[23] were pre-
2
2
6
4
2 4
6
and Ph
2 6 4 2
N-4-C H CO H in
pared by reported procedures.
refluxing ortho-dichlorobenzene and THF. After 3 days this yielded
a red solution. THF was removed under vacuum and the resulting
precipitate was washed with hexanes to yield an orange-brown
microcrystalline solid.
i
2
.9. Mo
2
(T PB)
2
[O
2
CC
6
H
4
-4-N(Ph)
2
]
2. (I)
i
Mo
2
(T PB)
4
(0.200 g, 0.169 mmol) was dissolved in toluene (ca.
CC N(Ph)
2
5
mL). This solution was added to a suspension of HO
2
H
6 4
(
0.100 g, 0.345 mmol) in toluene (ca. 5 mL). The orange solution
i
3
.2. Single crystal and molecular structure of trans-Mo
2
(T PB)
2
formed initially changed shortly afterwards to a bright yellow sus-
pension. The reaction was stirred for 3 days. The solid was col-
lected by centrifugation and washed twice with toluene (ca.
[O
2
CC N(Ph) , I
6
H
4
2 2
]
ꢀ
Compound I crystallized in the space group P1 and contains a
5
mL) and once with hexanes (ca. 10 mL) to yield a canary yellow
powder. (Yield 65%) Crystals were grown by layering a saturated
THF solution with hexanes. NMR (THF-d 400 MHz): 8.26 (d, 4H,
HH = 8.6 Hz), 7.38 (t, 8H, JHH = 8.0 Hz), 7.20 (m, 16H), 7.07 (s, 4H),
center of inversion. There are two disordered solvent THF mole-
cules that are coordinated along the MM axis. Two of the isopropyl
moieties also showed disorder over two positions and were mod-
eled accordingly. An ORTEP drawing of I can be seen below in
Fig. 2. From the ORTEP plot we can clearly see the trans nature of
the ligands which are related by a center of inversion. Furthermore,
8
J
3
(
2
1
.12 (septet, 4H, JHH = 7.7 Hz), 2.94 (septet, 2H, JHH = 7.1 Hz) 1.30
d, 12H, JHH = 6.8 Hz), 1.15 (d, 24H, JHH = 6.8 Hz). UV–Vis (THF,
93 K) 438, 326 nm. MALDI-TOF: Found: 1262.3 m/z. Requires
267.30 m/z.
i
it is clear that the aryl ring of the T PB moiety is twisted signifi-
cantly out of the plane of its CO
it from conjugation. In contrast, the C
is virtually planar to its CO
for extensive L -Mo d-L
been seen for compounds of the form trans-M
2
group; thus effectively removing
moiety of the TPA ligand
6 4
H
i
2
.10. W
2
(T PB)
2
[O CC H
2 6 4
2
N(Ph) ]
2. (II)
2
group (torsion angle ꢀ7°) which allows
p
2
p
conjugation. A similar geometry has
i
W
2
(T PB)
4
(0.220 g, 0.162 mmol) was dissolved in toluene (ca.
CC -4-
(0.088 g, 0.304 mmol) in toluene (ca. 5 mL). The purple sus-
i
2
(T BP)
2
L
2
where L
5
mL). This solution was added to a suspension of HO
2
6 4
H
is para-cyanobenzoate [24], vinyl-thienyl carboxylate [25], and
-carboethoxy-2-azulene carboxylate [26]. Full structural data
N(Ph)
2
6
pension formed initially darkened to a dark purple color over time.
The reaction was stirred for 3 days. The solid was collected by centri-
fugation and washed twice with toluene (ca. 5 mL) and once with
hexanes (ca. 10 mL) to yield a purple powder. (Yield 51%) NMR
are given in the Supporting information.
3.3. Electronic structure calculations
(
THF-d
Hz), 7.20 (m, 12H), 7.12 (t, 4H, JHH = 7.4 Hz), 7.07 (s, 4H), 2.93 (m,
H), 1.29 (d, 12H, JHH = 7.0 Hz), 1.09 (d, 24H, JHH = 7.0 Hz). UV–Vis
THF, 293 K) 609, 413, 334, 293 nm. MALDI-TOF: Found: 1438.6 m/
z. Requires: 1443.1 m/z.
8
400 MHz): 8.04 (d, 4H, JHH = 8.4 Hz), 7.36 (t, 8H, JHH = 8.1 -
In order to assist in the interpretation of the spectroscopic data
0
0
6
(
we have carried out calculations on the model compounds I and II ,
i
respectively, where formate substitutes for T PB ligands. This saves
on computational time and since the aryl groups of the T PB ligands
i
are twisted, extensive conjugation is not possible as it is for the
0
0
2.11. Mo [O CC
2 2 6
4 2
H N(Ph) ]4. (III)
trans-O
2
CC
6
H
4 2
-4-NPh ligands. The calculations for I and II con-
verged in C
1
symmetry. The frontier orbitals are shown in Fig. 3
0
HO CC
2
6 4
H N(Ph)
2
(0.90 g, 3.11 mmol) and Mo(CO)
6
(0.411 g,
for both the molybdenum and tungsten model compounds, I and
0
1
.56 mmol) were refluxed for 3 days in a solution of 1,2-dichloro-
II . The calculated orbital energies are shown in Table 1.