C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
C could not be washed out. The S content droped in the used
catalyst to ca. 0.5%, and the catalyst could not be reused. To offset
the effects of sulfate leaching and formation of polymers, further
optimization of reaction conditions is obviously necessary.
Amberlyst 15 and MCM-41 were chosen as standards to compare
the catalytic activities in this study. The results showed that
Amberlyst 15 possesses roughly 1.5 times higher activity than
sulfated mesoporous Nb oxide, while MCM-41 has no activity at
all. Our catalyst is also three times more active in this reaction
than SiO2-Si-SCF3.16 Since our material has tunable pores in the
15-30 Å range, it is anticipated that it may find applications in
size and shape selective acid-catalyzed reactions for molecules too
large to fit in zeolite pores, yet small enough that the macroporous
(200-300 Å) structure of Amberlyst 15 would have no effect on
the steric profile of the reaction.
In summary, a series of high surface area mesoporous niobium
oxide materials with a range of acidity of Ho value from -6.6 to
-8.2 were prepared and screened for activity in the acid-catalyzed
benzylation of anisole. The sulfated material showed the highest
activity, almost 200 times greater than bulk sulfated standard. The
high activities were attributed to the mesoporosity and increased
concentration of Brønsted sites on the surface of the mesoporous
channels.
Figure 2. Percent conversion of benzyl alcohol in benzylation of anisole
catalyzed by different mesoporous Nb oxides.
the inner surface of the Nb oxide mesostructure. To further probe
the surface acidity of these mesoporous Nb oxides, the Hammett
acidity and n-butylamine titration methods14 were employed.
Commercially available bulk niobium pentoxides were used here
as standards to gauge the effect of the mesoporous structure on
acidity (Table S1, S2). From these data it is clear that bulk niobia
possesses only very weak acidic sites on the surface (pKa ) +3.3),
even for the sulfated and phosphated samples (pKa ) -3.0).
In contrast, pure mesoporous Nb oxide has a surprising Ho<
-6.6, and after being treated with 1 M sulfuric or phosphoric acid,
its Ho value can reach as low as -8.2, equal to 90% sulfuric acid.14
Table S2 shows the n-butylamine titration data for these materials.
The sulfated mesoporous material possesses 10 times more total
Lewis and Brønsted acid sites (31.78 mmol/g) than the parent (2.478
mmol/g) or phosphated (3.086 mmol/g) oxides, and almost 100
times more acid sites than the bulk samples (0.024-0.338 mmol/
g). The higher BET surface areas (Table S3) of the mesoporous
materials can account for some of this difference, although it is
also clear that sulfate is more effective than phosphate in generating
surface acid sites.
Acknowledgment. The authors wish to acknowledge NSERC
for the financial support of this research. We are also grateful to
Haining Liu for the artwork of reaction and Ahmad Hamaed for
the MCM-41 sample.
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental pro-
cedure, power X-ray diffraction patterns, N2 adsorption/desorption
isotherm and FTIR spectra. This material is available free of charge
References
The catalytic activities of these mesoporous Nb oxide materials
and bulk Nb oxides were evaluated in the benzylation of anisole
with benzyl alcohol in liquid phase at reflux temperature of the
mixture10a (Figure 2). These relatively bulky substrates were used
to illustrate the diffusion advantages of the mesoporous system.
Bulk Nb2O5 show moderate catalytic activities similar to those
reported by Morais et al.10a (Figure S4). The untreated mesoporous
Nb oxide has an activity of ca. 8 times (80% in 9 h) that of the
sulfated bulk material (10% in 9 h), while the phosphated
mesoporous sample possesses an activity almost 20 times higher
than this value. The best results were achieved with the sulfated
mesoporous oxide, which showed 100% conversion in only 30 min.
This activity is ca. 200 times greater than that of the sulfated bulk
oxide, and can be attributed to the higher acid strengths, greater
number of acid sites, and more ideal diffusion properties in the
mesoporous sample. Since the phosphated and sulfated materials
possess a similar strength and distribution of acid sites, the greater
activity of the latter over the former is likely due to the greater
number of acid sites in the sulfated material. This material also
showed >50 times greater activity than the phosphated or parent
mesoporous sample in the benzylation of toluene (Figure S5). A
mixture of products was obtained in all cases, and surface areas of
catalyst ca. 10 m2/g after reactions and >12 wt % C indicated that
rapid polymerization of the neat reactants may have occurred over
the course of the reaction, resulting in pore blockage. This excess
(1) (a) Guisnet, M.; Alvarez, F.; Giannetto, G.; Perot, G. Catal. Today, 1987,
1, 415. (b) Carvill, B. T.; Lerner, B. A.; Adelman, B. J.; Tomczak, D. C.;
Sachtler, W. M. J. Catal. 1993, 144, 1.
(2) (a) Hino, M.; Arata, K. Chem. Lett. 1979, 1259. (b) Hino, M.; Arata, K.
J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1980, 851. (c) Hino, M.; Arata, K. J. Chem.
Soc. Chem. Commun. 1979, 1148.
(3) Xia, Q.-H.; Hidajat, K.; Kawi, S. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 2000,
2229.
(4) Al-Daous, M. A.; Stein, A. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 2638.
(5) Wong, M. S.; Ying, J. Y. Nanostruct. Mater. 1997, 9, 165
(6) (a) Antonelli, D. M.; Ying, J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35,
426. (b) Antonelli, D. M.; Nakahira, A.; Ying, J. Y. Inorg. Chem. 1996,
35, 3126.
(7) (a) Ziolek, M. Catal. Today 2003, 78, 47. (b) Nowak, I.; Ziolek, M. Chem.
ReV. 1999, 99, 3603. (c) Ushikubo, T. Catal. Today 2003, 78, 79.
(8) (a) Ushikubo, T.; Wada, K. Appl. Catal. 1990, 67, 25. (b) Ushikubo, T.;
Wada, K. Chem. Lett. 1988, 1573.
(9) Moraes, M.; Pinto, W. de S. F.; Gonzalez, W. A.; Carmo, L. M. P. M.;
Pastura, N. M. R.; Lachter, E. R. Appl. Catal., A 1996, 138, L7.
(10) (a) Morais, M.; Torres, E. F.; Carmo, L. M. P. M.; Pastura, N. M. R.;
Gonzalez, W. A.; dos Santos, A. C. B.; Lachter, E. R. Catal. Today 1996,
28, 17. (b) Guo, C.; Qian, Z. Catal. Today 1993, 16, 379.
(11) (a) Jehng, J.-M.; Wachs, I. E. Catal. Today 1993, 16, 417. (b) Wachs, I.
E.; Chen, Y.; Jehng, J.-M.; Briand, L. E.; Tanaka, T. Catal. Today 2003,
78, 13.
(12) Datka, J.; Turek, A. M.; Jehng, J. M.; Wachs, I. E. J. Catal. 1992, 135,
186.
(13) Aranda, D. A. G.; Ramos, A. L. D.; Passos, F. B.; Schmal, M. Catal.
Today 1996, 28, 119.
(14) Yurdakoc, M.; Akcay, M.; Tonbul, Y.; Yurdakoc, K. Turk. J. Chem. 1999,
23, 319.
(15) Zhou, D.-Q.; Jiang, Y.-Y. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 159, 85.
(16) Zhou, D.-Q.; Yang, J.-H.; Domg, G. M.; Hunag, M.-Y.; Jiang, Y. Y. J.
Mol. Catal. 2000, 159, 85.
JA0647147
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 43, 2006 13997