JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2015 249
experiments were carried out on a Bruker AM-400 spectrometer or
a DRX-500 spectrometer or an Avance III 600 spectrometer with
the solvents CDCl3 and DMSO-d6, and Me4Si as internal standard.
Column chromatography was performed on Silica gels (60–80 mesh,
200–300 mesh, 300–400 mesh, Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co. Ltd,
Qingdao, China). Pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 (Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany) was used for TLC. Semipreparative HPLC was performed
on a Hypersil Gold RP-C18 column (i.d. 10 × 250 mm; Thermo
Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) developed with
CH3CN–H2O at r.t. All regular solvents and reagents were reagent
grade and purchased from Aldrich-Sigma Chemical Co., Acros
Organics and J&K Scientific. The purities of all compounds were
more than 95% as determined by HPLC. All yields reported are for
dry compounds that require no further purification for use in other
reactions.
2-Bromo-4,5-dimethoxybenzoic acid (3):
A
solution of
Figure 3 X-ray crystal structure of compound 7 (CCDC 948062), crystal
data: C18H21NO2, M = 283.36, monoclinic, a = 20.412(7) Å, b = 9.126(3)
Å, c = 8.164(3) Å, α = 90.00°, β = 95.825(5)°, γ = 90.00°, V = 1513.0(9)
Å3, T = 100(2) K, space group P21/c, Z = 4, μ(MoKα) = 0.081 mm-1, 12550
reflections measured, 3649 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0612). The
final R1 values were 0.0789 (I > 2σ(I)). The final wR(F2) values were 0.1941
(I > 2σ(I)). The final R1 values were 0.1238 (all data). The final wR(F2) values
were 0.2230 (all data). The goodness of fit on F2 was 1.089.
6-bromoveratraldehyde (2, 250 mg, 1 mmol), NaHCO3 (200 mg), and
KMnO4 (500 mg) in H2O (20 mL) was heated to 90 °C with stirring
for 3 h, then extracted with CH2Cl2 (20 mL) twice. The organic phase
was washed with saturated NH4Cl and brine, dried over MgSO4,
filtered and concentrated. The residue was then purified by column
chromatography to give 3 as a pale yellow solid (220 mg, 85% yield).
m.p. 183–185 °C, (lit. 6 184–185 °C); IR (KBr) nmax 2960, 1702, 1598,
1568, 1514, 1436, 1263, 663, 511 cm-1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3 ) δ
7.54 (s, 1H), 7.52 (s,1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.81 (s, 3H);13C NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 169.87, 153.3, 152.14, 121.85, 116.73, 115.31, 111.64, 56.81,
56.64; ESI+MS m/z 261 [M + H]+; HREIMS m/z 259.9690 [M]+ (calcd
for C9H9BrO4, 259.9684).
1542, 1509, 1451, 1260, 643, 576 cm-1;1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ
7.57 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (s, 1H), 7.49 (s, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 6.9 Hz,
1H), 6.75 (m,1H), 4.06 (s, 2H), 4.02 (s, 3H), 3.98 (s, 3H), 2.96 (q, J =
7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H);13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 153.4 (C), 146.5 (C), 140.5 (C), 138.8 (C), 132.9 (C), 131.3
(CH), 130.0 (C), 129.0 (C), 123.2 (CH), 120.5 (CH), 108.9 (CH), 103.1
(CH), 52.3 (CH2), 56.8 (CH3), 56.4 (CH3), 39.9 (CH3), 28.5 (CH2), 15.8
(CH3). HREIMS m/z 283.1567 [M]+ (calcd for C18H21NO2, 283.1572).
4-Ethyl-5-methyl-5,6-dihydrophenanthridine-8,9-diol (1): Com-
pound 7 (29 mg, 0.1 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL CH2Cl2. The
reaction solution was then cooled to –78 °C and BBr3 (100 μL, 0.2
mmol) was added. The mixture was then stirred for 4 h after which it
was diluted in 10 mL saturated NaHCO3. The solution was extracted
twice with CH2Cl2 (15 mL), and the organic layer was washed with
brine, concentrated, and then purified by column chromatography
using chloroform-methanol (20:1) as the eluent to give 1 as a pale
yellow powder (20 mg, 80% yield) m.p. 139–141 °C; IR (KBr) nmax
3384, 2965, 1613, 1513, 1451, 1411, 1377, 1304, 1248, 1122, 929, 867,
2-Bromo-4,5-dimethoxy-N-methyl-benzamide (4): Compound
3
(260 mg, 1mmol) was dissolved in THF (10 mL), to which DMF (0.1
mL) and SOCl2 (0.5 mL, 4mmol) were added. The reaction solution
was stirred for 2 h at 50 °C and then concentrated to remove THF.
The residue was then added to a 30% solution of methylamine in
water (20 mL) at 5°C and filtered. The cake was purified by column
chromatography to give 4 as a pale yellow solid (205 mg, 75%
yield). m.p. 119–121 °C; IR (KBr) nmax 3422, 2961, 1597, 1551, 1505,
1
1456, 1259, 1159, 1014, 865 cm-1; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.46
(s, 1H), 7.33 (s, 1H), 6.63 (s, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 2.79 (s,
3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.31, 152.32, 151.16, 131.95,
116.69, 116.31, 112.86, 56.81, 56.78, 26.33; ESI+MS m/z 274 [M+H]+;
HREIMS m/z 273.0004 [M]+ (calcd for C10H12BrNO3, 273.0001).
4-Ethyl-5-methyl-8,9-dimethoxyphenanthridin-6(5H)-one (6):
A
flask was charged under nitrogen with Pd(OAc)2 (3.0 mg, 0.013 mmol),
tri-2-furylphosphine (6.2 mg, 0.027 mmol), K2CO3 (72.3 mg, 0.52
mmol), the amide 4 (0.26 mmol), a solution of norbornene (26.9 mg,
0.286 mmol) in anhydrous solvent (5.8 mL), and 1-ethyl-2-iodobenzene
(5, 0.26 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated with stirring at 85
°C for 6 h and then cooled to room temperature. After the addition of
saturated NH4Cl (30 mL) and extraction with EtOAc (3×15 mL), the
combined organic extracts were washed with brine (30 mL) and dried
over Na2SO4. Removal of the solvent under reduced pressure gave the
crude product, which was purified by flash chromatography on silica
gel to furnish 6 as white wax (58 mg, 75% yield). IR (KBr) nmax 3446,
2923, 1642, 1550, 1512, 1464, 1360, 1029, 691, 563, cm-1; 1H NMR
δ 8.21 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.60 (s, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 7.4
Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.25 (m, 1H), 3.92 (s, 3H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.76 (s, 3H),
3.01–3.03 (m, 2H), 1.25 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR: δ 166.1, 139.4,
134.5, 132.5, 132.1, 131.3, 128.7, 127.5, 125.1, 129.6, 122.2, 121.1, 121.0,
58.3, 58.1, 38.6, 28.1, 15.5; HREIMS m/z 297.1361 [M]+ (calcd for
C18H19NO3, 297.1365).
1
804, 755 cm-1; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.46 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H),
7.27 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (dt, J = 15.0, 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (s, 1H), 6.75
(s, 1H), 3.96 (s, 2H), 2.82–2.76 (m, 2H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 1.28 (dd, J = 14.7,
13
7.1 Hz, 3H); C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 143.8 (C), 143.0 (C), 141.2
(C), 139.4 (C), 128.8 (C), 127.6 (CH), 126.3(C), 125.1 (C), 124.6 (CH),
120.7 (CH), 113.8 (CH), 110.4 (CH), 53.6 (CH2), 40.2 (CH3), 23.2
(CH2), 14.8 (CH3)。HREIMS m/z 255.1250 [M]+ (calcd for C16H17NO2,
255.1259).
Conclusions
To enable the production of phenanthridine-type derivatives in
sufficient quantities to enable their use in further bioassays, a
totally synthetic route to the key intermediate 8 was developed.
This new route hinges on an efficient palladium-catalysed
coupling reaction involving sequential C–N and C–C bond
formation with C–H activation. In conclusion, an efficient
and convenient synthesis of the key intermediate of potent
phenanthridins Wnt agonists has been reported. This route
featured a one-step palladium catalysed preparation of 4-ethyl-
5-methyl-8,9-dimethoxyphenanthridin-6(5H)-one (6). The
relatively simple reaction procedure, utilisation of cheap and
readily available reagents, and ideal yields (23%) of products
are the main advantages of the present approach.
4-Ethyl-5-methyl-8,9-dimethoxy-5,6-dihydrophenanthridine
(7):
A solution of 6 (30 mg, 0.1 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added to LAH
(20 mg) at –78 °C. The reaction was stirred for 2 h and then quenched
using H2O (5 mL). The mixture was then extracted with Et2O (20 mL)
twice. The organic phase was washed with brine and concentrated,
and the residue was purified by column chromatography to give 7 as
a colourless solid (21 mg, 75% yield), its X-ray crystal structure was
determined (Fig. 3), m.p. 72–74 °C; IR (KBr) nmax 2912, 1653, 1638,