2682
Organometallics 2008, 27, 2682–2684
Carbon-Carbon Bond Formation on Reaction of a Copper(I)
Stannyl Complex with Carbon Dioxide
Koyel X. Bhattacharyya,* Jennifer A. Akana, David S. Laitar, Jacob M. Berlin, and
Joseph P. Sadighi†
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 18-344, 77 Massachusetts AVenue,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
ReceiVed February 24, 2008
Scheme 1. (IPr)Cu-E Complexes React Differently with
Summary: The reaction of (IPr)CuOt-Bu (IPr ) 1,3-bis(2,6-
diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene) with triphenylstannane
forms a stannyl complex, (IPr)CuSnPh3, by deprotonation of
the tin-hydrogen bond. This stannyl complex reacts with CO2
to afford (IPr)CuO2CPh as the sole copper-containing species.
A tin-carbon bond in (IPr)CuSnPh3 also undergoes facile
cleaVage by mild acids such as 2,4-lutidinium chloride.
CO2 Depending on Choice of E
Carbon dioxide is a benign and readily available source of
carbon;1 however, thermodynamic and kinetic considerations
limit its practical use in chemical synthesis.2 Metal complexes
that display unique reactivity toward carbon dioxide hold
promise in the development of new catalytic CO2-fixation
reactions.3,4 The reactivity of organocopper complexes with CO2
to form copper carboxylates5,6 encouraged the study of other
complexes containing copper-E bonds (E ) main-group ligand)
(Scheme 1). The N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) supported
copper-boryl species (IPr)CuB(pin) (IPr ) 1,3-bis(2,6-diiso-
propylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene, B(pin) ) boryl pinacolate)
reacts with CO2 to form (IPr)CuOB(pin), with concomitant
extrusion of CO.3 DFT calculations support a nucleophilic
Cu-B bond, with initial formation of B-C and Cu-O bonds
upon insertion of CO2.7 The silyl complex (IPr)CuSiPh3 showed
similar net reactivity, reducing CO2 to CO and forming
(IPr)CuOSiPh3.8 To explore whether and how a copper-tin bond
would react with CO2, we synthesized the stannyl complex
(IPr)CuSnPh3 (1). To our surprise, treatment of 1 with CO2
resulted in carbon-carbon bond formation, affording the
benzoate complex (IPr)CuO2CPh (2).13
The copper stannyl complex 1 was initially synthesized by
the addition of Ph3SnH to [(IPr)CuH]2 in benzene solution (eq
1).9 Although this reaction proceeded in good yield, the high
air-sensitivity and thermal instability of the hydride prompted
a search for more synthetically convenient routes to the stannyl
complex. Interestingly, the reaction of Ph3SnH with (IPr)CuMe
instead produces methyltriphenyltin and [(IPr)CuH]2,5 as judged
1
by H NMR spectroscopy. We later found that (IPr)CuOt-Bu
is sufficiently basic to deprotonate the stannane, forming 1 and
1
t-BuOH (eq 2).9 Complex 1 was characterized by H NMR
spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 1).
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: koyel@mit.edu.
† Current address: U.S. Army Infantry School, Fort Benning, GA.
(1) Behr, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 661–678.
(2) Carbon Dioxide Fixation and Reduction in Biological and Model
Systems; Branden, C.-I., Schneider, G., Ed.s; Oxford University Press: New
York, 1994. (b) Baiker, A. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 14, 751–762.
(3) Laitar, D. S.; Muller, P.; Sadighi, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 17196–17197.
Single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by
slow vapor diffusion of hexanes into a toluene solution of 1 at
-40 °C. Complex 1 possesses a Cu-Sn bond length of 2.469(5)
Å, similar to that of other copper stannyl complexes (2.45-2.50
Å).10
Complex 1 reacts with CO2 (1.04 atm) to form a single NHC-
containing species (eq 3), as determined by 1H NMR spectros-
copy. Single crystals of the product were analyzed by X-ray
diffraction and identified as the benzoate complex 2 (Figure
(4) See, for example: (a) Meshitsuka, S.; Ichikawa, M.; Tamura, K.
Chem. Commun. 1974, 158–159. (b) Beley, M.; Collin, J.-P.; Ruppert, R.;
Sauvage, J.-P. Chem. Commun. 1984, 1315–1316. (c) Beley, M.; Collin,
J.-P.; Ruppert, R.; Sauvage, J.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 7461–7467.
(d) Hammouche, M.; Lexa, D.; Momenteau, M.; Save´ant, J.-M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8455–8466. (e) Bhugun, I.; Lexa, D.; Save´ant, J.-
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1769–1776.
(5) Mankad, N. P.; Gray, T. G.; Laitar, D. S.; Sadighi, J. P. Organo-
metallics 2004, 23, 1191–1193.
(6) (a) Ikariya, T.; Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974, 72, 145–
151. (b) Marsich, N.; Camus, A.; Nardin, G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1982,
239, 429–437. (c) Miyashita, A.; Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1976,
113, 187–199. (d) Miyashita, A.; Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1973,
49, C57-C58.
(9) Mankad, N. P.; Laitar, D. S.; Sadighi, J. P. Organometallics 2004,
23, 3369–3371.
(7) Zhao, H.; Lin, Z.; Marder, T. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15637–
15643.
(10) (a) Dias, H. V. R.; Wang, X.; Diyabalanage, H. V. K. Inorg. Chem.
2005, 44, 7322–7324. (b) Klett, J.; Klinkhammer, K. W.; Niemeyer, M.
Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2531–2536.
(8) Laitar, D. S. Synthetic and Catalytic Studies of Group 11 N-
Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes, Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
(11) Darensbourg, D. J.; Bauch, C. G.; Reibenspies, J. H.; Rheingold,
A. L. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 4203.
10.1021/om8001729 CCC: $40.75
2008 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 05/20/2008