Published on Web 02/14/2002
Hydroxide as General Base in the Saponification of Ethyl
Acetate
Julio F. Mata-Segreda*
Contribution from the School of Chemistry, UniVersity of Costa Rica, 2060 Costa Rica
Received August 9, 2001
2 2
Abstract: The second-order rate constant for the saponification of ethyl acetate at 30.0 °C in H O/D O
-
1
mixtures of deuterium atom fraction n (a proton inventory experiment) obeys the relation k
M
2
(n) ) 0.122 s
-
1
3
(1 - n + 1.2n) (1 - n + 0.48n)/(1 - n + 1.4n) (1 - n + 0.68n) . This result is interpreted as a process
where formation of the tetrahedral intermediate is the rate-determining step and the transition-state complex
is formed via nucleophilic interaction of a water molecule with general-base assistance from hydroxide ion,
opposite to the direct nucleophilic collision commonly accepted. This mechanistic picture agrees with previous
heavy-atom kinetic isotope effect data of Marlier on the alkaline hydrolysis of methyl formate (Marlier, J. F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5953).
The alkaline hydrolysis of carboxylic esters in solution is
commonly accepted to take place by a two-step mechanism,
where formation of the tetrahedral intermediate is strongly rate-
acids undergo alkaline hydrolysis with relatively low enthalpies
of activation, e.g., 40 kJ/mol for ethyl formate, 43 kJ/mol for
ethyl acetate, 44 kJ/mol for ethyl isobutyrate, and 52 kJ/mol
1
1
determining and occurs through direct nucleophilic collisions
for ethyl pivalate, too low a value to account for extensive
between hydroxide ions and ester molecules (eq 1, the BAC2
mechanism).
desolvation.
Kinetic data on the saponification of ethyl acetate in mixtures
of water and organic solvents show that one water molecule is
involved in the formation of the transition-state (TS) complex.
These cases include acetone-H2O mixtures in the range from
4
pure water to a water concentration of 22 M, dioxane-H2O
mixtures over the water concentration range from 24 to 53 M,4
and DMSO-H2O mixtures with water concentrations from 5
5
to 25 M. This idea of general-base catalysis also fits well with
the intuitive picture of a moving negatively charged “OH”
atomic configuration, randomly diffusing in aqueous media via
a Grotthuss mechanism, until it becomes attached to the
2
Marlier challenged this commonly held view in 1993 on the
basis of heavy-atom kinetic isotope effect experiments. The
author measured carbonyl carbon and oxygen as well as
nucleophilic oxygen kinetic isotope effects for the alkaline
hydrolysis of methyl formate in water solvent at 25 °C. Carbonyl
oxygen k16/k18 ) 0.999, carbonyl carbon k12/k13 ) 1.038, and
oxygen nucleophile k16/k18 ) 1.023 were interpreted as consis-
tent with a stepwise mechanism with rate-limiting formation
of the tetrahedral intermediate. The isotope effect on the oxygen
nucleophile was interpreted as a molecular event where the
attacking nucleophile in aqueous alkali is water, with general
base assistance from hydroxide.
6
aqueous solvation sphere of the ester. Once in place, the TS
complex for ester alkaline hydrolysis may be formed through
the intermediacy of a bridging water molecule. Thus, consid-
erations other than Marlier’s kinetic isotope effects also suggest
the direct nucleophilic collision as a less likely mechanism for
the saponification of carboxylic esters.
7
A proton inVentory experiment for the saponification of a
common carboxylic ester will clearly discriminate the direct
nucleophilic collision from the general-base-catalyzed mecha-
nism, since this kind of probe allows the determination of the
minimal structure of the TS complex. A minimal structure
includes all the reacting molecules and ions involved in the
formation of the TS complex, without details about the config-
uration of loosely bound solvent molecules.
Hydroxide ion is strongly solvated in aqueous environment,
as can be inferred from its high enthalpy of hydration of -423.4
kJ/mol. A direct ester/OH nucleophilic collision must in-
3
-
volve a great amount of desolvation energy. Esters of carboxylic
*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jmata@
cariari.ucr.ac.cr.
(4) Tommila, E.; Koivisto, A.; Lyyra, J. P.; Antell, K.; Heimo, S. Ann. Acad.
Sci. Fennicae A II 1952, No. 47.
(
(
(
1) Kirby, A. J. In ComprehensiVe Chemical Kinetics; Bamford, C. H., Tipper,
C. F. H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1972; Vol. 10.
(5) Tommila, E.; Murto, Acta Chem. Scand. 1963, 17, 1947.
(6) Laidler, K. J. Chemical Kinetics, 3rd ed.; Harper & Row: New York, 1987;
p 221.
2) (a) Marlier, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5953. (b) Marlier, J. F.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 283.
3) Friedman, H. L.; Krishnan, C. V. In Water. A ComprehensiVe Treatise;
Franks, F., Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1973; Vol. 3, p 56.
(7) Schowen, K. B. J. In Transition States of Biochemical Processes; Gandour,
R. D., Schowen, R. L., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1978.
10.1021/ja011931t CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 124, NO. 10, 2002 2259