Paper
To study the variation of the catalysts during the reaction,
RSC Advances
7 Y. Wang, W. Deng, B. Wang, Q. Zhang, X. Wan, Z. Tang,
Y. Wang, C. Zhu, Z. Cao, G. Wang and H. Wan, Nat.
Commun., 2013, 4, 2141.
8 X. Xu, J. Lin and P. Cen, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2006, 14, 419–
427.
the spent catalysts were analyzed by TG-DTA and the results
were shown in Fig. 7. The weight loss of the spent catalyst was
relatively small due to the slow carbon deposition (Table S1†).
Both the EtOH/ult-0 h-500 spent for 9 and 48 h had most weight
ꢀ
loss ꢀunder 400 C and showed a broad heat ow peak around
9 S. Varadarajan and D. J. Miller, Biotechnol. Prog., 1999, 15,
845–854.
300 C, indicating complex chemical composition of the depo-
sition. Furthermore, XRD was used to study the crystal texture of 10 Z. Zhai, X. Li, C. Tang, J. Peng, N. Jiang, W. Bai, H. Gao and
the spent catalysts, and the results were shown in Fig. S6.† The Y. Liao, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53, 10318–10327.
intensity of diffraction peak was reduced aer reaction because 11 R. E. Holmen, Minnesota Mining and MFG, US Pat.,
of the carbon deposition. No peak shi was observed in the 2859240, 1958.
enlarged patterns, indicating that the crystal texture was stable 12 P. Sun, D. Yu, K. Fu, M. Gu, Y. Wang, H. Huang and H. Ying,
during the reaction and the carbon deposition should be
responsible for the catalyst deactivation.
Catal. Commun., 2009, 10, 1345–1349.
13 H. Wang, D. Yu, P. Sun, J. Yan, Y. Wang and H. Huang, Catal.
Commun., 2008, 9, 1799–1803.
14 J. Yan, D. Yu, H. Li, P. Sun and H. Huang, J. Rare Earths,
2010, 28, 803–806.
15 J. Yan, D. Yu, P. Sun and H. Huang, Chin. J. Catal., 2011, 32,
405–411.
16 D. Yu, P. Sun, Z. Tang, Z. Li and H. Huang, Can. J. Chem.
Eng., 2011, 89, 484–490.
17 J. Zhang, Y. Zhao, X. Feng, M. Pan, J. Zhao, W. Ji and C. T. Au,
Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 1376.
4. Conclusions
The structure–activity relationship of the BaSO4 catalyst was
studied for the dehydration reaction of LA to AA. Specic
conditions such as ethanol solvent and ultrasonic treatment
were employed in the co-precipitation preparation of BaSO4
catalysts, and the obtained catalyst had a much smaller
crystal size and more crystal defects. These catalysts, denoted
as EtOH/ult, also had much higher surface area and acid
amount. Further studies of the catalyst texture and binding
energy revealed that the crystal defects with unbalanced
electrons provided acid and basic sites, which acted as the
active sites in LA dehydration. This was further conrmed by
changing the catalyst preparation conditions such as the
aging time and calcination temperature, in which the catal-
ysis performance had a good correlation with the amounts of
crystal defects and acid amounts. The highest surface area
and acid amount were obtained over the EtOH/ult-0 h-500
catalyst, which consequently showed enhanced reaction
activity (88.9% LA conversion) and selectivity (78.8% AA
selectivity).
¨
18 G. Nafe, Y. Traa, T. Hirth and E. Klemm, Catal. Lett., 2014,
144, 1144–1150.
19 J. Zhang, X. Feng, Y. Zhao, W. Ji and C. T. Au, J. Ind. Eng.
Chem., 2014, 20, 1353–1358.
20 C. Yuan, H. Liu, Z. Zhang, H. Lu, Q. Zhu and Y. Chen, Chin. J.
Catal., 2015, 36, 1861–1866.
21 B. Yan, L. Z. Tao, Y. Liang and B. Q. Xu, ACS Catal., 2014, 4,
1931–1943.
22 B. Yan, L. Z. Tao, Y. Liang and B. Q. Xu, ChemSusChem, 2014,
7, 1568–1578.
23 E. Blanco, C. Lorentz, P. Delichere, L. Burel, M. Vrinat,
J. M. M. Millet and S. Loridant, Appl. Catal., B, 2016, 180,
596–606.
¨
´
´
24 G. Nafe, M. A. Lopez-Martınez, M. Dyballa, M. Hunger,
Y. Traa, T. Hirth and E. Klemm, J. Catal., 2015, 329,
413–424.
Acknowledgements
25 V. C. Ghantani, S. T. Lomate, M. K. Dongare and
S. B. Umbarkar, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 1211.
26 E. Blanco, P. Delichere, J. M. M. Millet and S. Loridant, Catal.
Today, 2014, 226, 185–191.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No. 21676155).
27 Y. Matsuura, A. Onda, S. Ogo and K. Yanagisawa, Catal.
Today, 2014, 226, 192–197.
28 J. Peng, X. Li, C. Tang and W. Bai, Green Chem., 2014, 16,
108–111.
29 C. Tang, J. Peng, G. Fan, X. Li, X. Pu and W. Bai, Catal.
Commun., 2014, 43, 231–234.
30 J. Zhang, Y. Zhao, M. Pan, X. Feng, W. Ji and C. T. Au, ACS
Catal., 2011, 1, 32–41.
31 D. Wu, H. Zhu, C. Zhang and L. Chen, Chem. Commun., 2010,
46, 7250–7252.
32 H. P. Cong and S. H. Yu, Cryst. Growth Des., 2009, 9, 210–
217.
References
1 M. Dusselier, P. Van Wouwe, A. Dewaele, E. Makshina and
B. F. Sels, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 1415.
2 P. Gallezot, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 1538–1558.
3 Y. Fan, C. Zhou and X. Zhu, Catal. Rev., 2009, 51, 293–324.
4 Z. Y. Zhong, P. J. Dijkstra and J. Feijen, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 11291–11298.
5 M. A. Abdel-Rahman, Y. Tashiro and K. Sonomoto,
Biotechnol. Adv., 2013, 31, 877–902.
6 F. Auneau, L. S. Arani, M. Besson, L. Djakovitch, C. Michel,
F. Delbecq, P. Sautet and C. Pinel, Top. Catal., 2012, 55, 33 V. Ramaswamy, R. M. Vimalathithan and V. Ponnusamy,
474–479.
J. Ceram. Process. Res., 2011, 12, 173–175.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017
RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 10278–10286 | 10285