Direct Detection of SnMe
2
and Sn Me
2 4
A R T I C L E S
pentene derivatives 1-313a,15-23 and are consistent with formal
cheletropic cycloreversion to yield SnMe2 and the corresponding
conjugated diene as the primary photochemical reaction of these
molecules. In the gas phase, flash photolysis of 4a affords a
transient product with UV-vis spectrum and reactivity similar
to those assigned previously to SnMe2 in experiments with other
photochemical precursors to the molecule.12 Likewise, laser
photolysis of 4b in solution leads to behavior that is strikingly
similar to that observed from the related germanium compounds
corresponding dimetallenes (5b, 10b, 11b) predict a similar trend
in absorption maxima for these compounds, with predicted
values of λmax ) 445, 374, and 365 nm for the distannene,
digermene, and disilene, respectively. The agreement between
the predicted and experimental solution-phase spectra of
1
3a,73,74
Ge2Me4 (10b; λmax ) 370 nm)
and Si2Me4 (11b; λmax )
65
360 nm) is again outstanding and affords a considerable degree
of confidence in the ability of the theoretical method to predict
the position of the lowest-energy absorption band in Sn2Me4
(5b) with reasonable accuracy. We can thus be fairly certain
that the spectrum that grows in over the first ca. 1 µs after pulsed
laser photolysis of 4b is due to the distannene (λmax ≈ 470 nm),
shifted to the blue of the stannylene absorption band but
overlapped partially with it.
1
a and 3a,b, which was attributed to the initial formation of
the corresponding germylene derivatives (GeMe2, GePh2, and
GeMes2, respectively) followed by the products of dimerization
(
the corresponding digermenes) and then their subsequent
13a
oligomerization products. In all four cases (viz, 1a, 3a,b, and
b), this process is characterized by the sequential formation
4
Interestingly, the temporal behaviors of the transient signals
of species that absorb at successively shorter wavelengths than
the initially formed transient and exhibit successively longer
lifetimes, as would be expected. We thus assign the initially
formed species from laser photolysis of 4b to SnMe2 (λmax ≈
observed at the long- and short-wavelength edges (e.g., 530-
5
40 and 430-450 nm, respectively) of the broad transient
absorptions observed upon flash photolysis of 4b in solution
differ considerably from one another only in the first ca. 2 µs
after the laser pulse and then follow qualitatively similar time
dependences thereafter. These similarities presumably result
simply from the substantial overlap in the spectra of the two
species. Nevertheless, we considered in some detail the alterna-
tive possibility, that this behavior results from reVersible
interconversion of the stannylene and distannene over the time
scale of their eventual removal from the system via oligomer-
ization.
5
00 nm); the second one to its dimerization product, tetra-
methyldistannene (5b; λmax ≈ 470 nm); and the long-lived
species absorbing below 300 nm to higher SnMe2 oligomers
(eq 3).
The absorption spectrum of the stannylene in solution is
similar to that measured in the gas-phase experiments, although
because of instrumental limitations, we have been able to detect
only the short-wavelength rising edge of the gas-phase absorp-
tion band. Qualitative comparisons of the (1-2 µs) time scale
over which the initial decay of the stannylene and the growth
of its primary product occur to that observed in previous
experiments with GePh2 (for which a rate constant for dimer-
The possibility seems a reasonable one, as most of the stable
acyclic distannenes that are currently known are dissociative
42,75-80
in solution.
These compounds all contain sterically bulky
substituents, and most are tetraaryl-substituted; the individual
1
0
-1 -1
13a
ization of kdim ) 1.1 × 10
M
s
has been measured )
effects of steric and electronic factors on the SndSn bond
suggest that the dimerization of SnMe2 in solution proceeds at
a similar rate. This is consistent with the second-order decay
81
strengths in these compounds are not clear. We thus decided
to expand the scope of our DFT calculations on SnMe2 and 5b
to examine the predicted variations in bond dissociation energy
of the SndSn bond as a function of substituent, by bracketing
the value for the tetramethyl system with those for the parent
distannene (for which previous calculations have been re-
7
constant measured at 540 nm of k/ꢀ540 ) (1.4 ( 0.1) × 10 cm
-1
s ; if we assume that the extinction coefficient of the stannylene
3
-1
at its absorption maximum is on the order of 1000 dm mol
-
1
68,69
), a value of k ≈ 7 × 10 M s-1
9
-1
cm (cf. that for SiMe2
is obtained for the absolute rate constant for dimerization. To
our knowledge, the product of this reaction, tetramethyldistan-
nene (5b), has not been detected directly before under any set
of conditions.
33,34,44
ported
) and tetraphenyldistannene (5c), as a model for the
known tetraaryldistannenes that are dissociative in solution. To
provide a benchmark for the calculations on the tin systems,
we also carried out similar calculations for the corresponding
digermenes (10) and disilenes (11) (Table 3) and hexameth-
yldistannane, all using the same theoretical method.
Comparison of the experimental spectra of SnMe2 (λmax )
22,70
5
4
00 nm), GeMe2 (λmax ) 480 nm),
and SiMe2 (λmax ) 453-
65 nm)6
0,64
reveals a consistent trend toward decreasing
The trend of decreasing BDE with increasing atomic number
of the group 14 element, which is observed in the present
excitation energy with increasing size of the group 14 element,
28
similar to that exhibited by 9 (λmax ) 484 nm ) and its Ge and
Si analogues (λmax ) 450 nm71 and 440 nm, respectively).
The trend is reproduced reasonably faithfully by the TD-DFT
calculations, which predict lowest-energy absorption maxima
of 502, 463, and 457 nm for SnMe2, GeMe2,1 and SiMe2,
respectively. Calculations using the same method for the
72
(73) Mochida, K.; Kayamori, T.; Wakasa, M.; Hayashi, H.; Egorov, M. P.
Organometallics 2000, 19, 3379.
(
74) Taraban, M. B.; Volkova, O. S.; Plyusnin, V. F.; Ivanov, Y. V.; Leshina,
T. V.; Egorov, M. P.; Nefedov, O. M.; Kayamori, T.; Mochida, K. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2000, 601, 324.
3a
(
75) Goldberg, D. E.; Harris, D. H.; Lappert, M. F.; Thomas, K. M. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 261.
(
76) Klinkhammer, K. W.; Schwarz, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995,
34, 1334.
(
67) Martinho Simoes, J. A.; Liebman, J. F.; Slayden, S. W. In The Chemistry
of Organic, Germanium, Tin and Lead Compounds; Patai, S., Ed.; John
Wiley & Sons Ltd.: New York, 1995; Vol. 1, pp 245-266.
(77) Weidenbruch, M.; Kilian, H.; Peters, K.; von Schnering, H. G.; Marsmann,
H. Chem. Ber. 1995, 128, 983.
(78) Klinkhammer, K. W.; Fassler, T. F.; Grutzmacher, H. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1998, 37, 124.
(
68) Drahnak, T. J.; Michl, J.; West, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 5427.
69) Raabe, G.; Vancik, H.; West, R.; Michl, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
(
(79) Della Bona, M. A.; Cassani, M. C.; Keates, J. M.; Lawless, G. A.; Lappert,
M. F.; Sturmann, M.; Weidenbruch, M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998,
1187.
(80) Sturmann, M.; Saak, W.; Klinkhammer, K. W.; Weidenbruch, M. Z. Anorg.
Allg. Chem. 1999, 625, 1955.
(81) (a) Power, P. P. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998, 2939. (b) Power, P. P.
Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 3463.
6
71.
(
70) Mochida, K.; Tokura, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 65, 1642.
71) Kira, M.; Ishida, S.; Iwamoto, T.; Ichinohe, M.; Kabuto, C.; Ignatovich,
L.; Sakurai, H. Chem. Lett. 1999, 1999, 263.
(
(72) Kira, M.; Ishida, S.; Iwamoto, T.; Kabuto, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
1
21, 9722.
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 127, NO. 49, 2005 17475