2124
Y. Yanagisawa et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 2123–2126
Table 2
(b)
O
(a)
O
Effect of solvent on enantioselectivitya
Si face
HO
R
Si face
O
Entry
Solvent
ET(30)b
eec (%)
O
chiral auxiliary
Re face
1
2
Toluene
Et2O
CH2Cl2
MeCN
MeOH
33.9
34.5
40.7
45.6
55.4
18
10
8
4
3
O
substrate
Re f ace
substrate
chiral template
(C. Tem.)
3
R; OH, =NOH, NH2
4d
5
Figure 1. Models for chiral photoreaction. (a) Covalent bond model. (b) Non-
a
b
c
Reaction conditions: 6 (5 equiv), À78 °C, Irradiated for 2 h (>280 nm).
covalent bond model.
Ref. 17.
Error in ee upon GC analysis (InertCap CHIRAMIX) after methylation: <1%.
At À40 °C.
d
3
HOOC
R
S
S
8
especially high ee value (entry 1). It is noted that further stabiliza-
tion of the supramolecular complex may occur by interactions
4
(5)
(6)
( )
OH
NOH
NH2
R;
p–p
O
3
between the aromatic ring on C. Tem. and toluene. This type of
effect was previously reported, whereby naphthalene derivatives
as an additive could enhance de values.18 On the other hand, high
polar solvents showed worse selectivities, since these solvents
caused dissociation of 1Á6 supramolecular complex by a solvation
to 1 and 6 respectively.
Next, we investigated optimal amounts of 6 (Table 3). It is
assumed that a large amount of 6 could easily generate the supra-
molecular complex. As anticipated, the ee values were raised by
increasing the amount of 6. This tendency was also supported by
1H NMR titration experiments.15 On the contrary, the conversion
of starting material 1 did not change in the range of 1–5 equiv of
6 used, though the yield was decreased when decreasing the
amount of 6. That means free 1 also gave undesired products when
a small amount of 6 was used. Although the structures of the
byproducts were unknown, they were observed at every entry in
GC analysis.
Furthermore, we examined the temperature effect (Table 4).
The ee values showed temperature dependence, since lower tem-
perature promoted association ability of 1 and 6 (entries 1–3). Fur-
thermore, the conversions were also slightly increased with
decreasing temperature; this is attributed to the increased solubil-
ity of ethylene. The best conditions were established as shown in
entry 3.
Although we obtained an ee 18% in this reaction, this was
deemed insufficient for an enantiodifferentiating reaction. There-
fore, we implemented another strategy for improvement of enanti-
C. Tem.
HOOC
major
hν
+
+
solvent, Temp., 2 h
HOOC
R
R
O
1
5 mM
2
O
ent-3
minor
Scheme 1. Enantiodifferentiating [2+2] photocycloaddition.
were determined by comparison with the authentic sample de-
rived by the hydrolysis of the compounds obtained by correspond-
ing diastereoselective reaction and defined by X-ray
crystallography.11
As shown in Table 1, phenylmenthol 4, which would make the
simple pseudo–ester bond with carboxylic acid 1, did not give
any enantioselectivity; this is likely because the non-covalent link-
age (hydrogen bond) was not strong enough to make desired com-
plex compared to the dimer formation of 1 (entry 1).15 We next
used oxime derivative 5, a precursor of phenylmenthyl amine 6
having both proton donor (NOH) and proton acceptor (NOH).
Moreover, a stronger interaction was expected between 1 and 5
compared to homologous binding (carboxyl–carboxyl and
oxime–oxime).16 However, 5, having an sp2 carbon at C-3 position
also did not show any enantioselectivity (entry 2). Presumably, the
stereochemistry of the C-3 position must be important for intro-
ducing enantioselectivity. In contrast, phenylmenthyl amine 6 gave
a moderate enantioselectivity (entry 3). That means both acid–
base interactions between amine and carboxylic acid, and menthyl
skeleton are surely necessary for making the desired chiral supra-
molecular complex that introduces enantioselectivity.
To obtain further information on conditions for optimal enanti-
oselectivity, we next investigated the solvent effect (Table 2). As
shown in Table 2, less polar solvents showed better selectivities
and had a good correlation to ET(30) values.17 This tendency can
be explained by the fact that a lower solvent polarity enhances
acid–base interactions, which become strong enough to form a sta-
ble supramolecular complex in solution. Notably, toluene gave an
oselectivity; namely,
a selective excitation approach. It was
reported that such a strategy was very effective for controlling
the stereoselectivity in supramolecular reaction.19 Therefore, we
anticipated this strategy may also be effective for improving ee
of this reaction. In the above reaction, we used over 280 nm exci-
tation wavelength; however, this wavelength excites all chemical
species. Especially, free carboxylic acid 1, whose reaction faces
were not controlled by C. Tem., or self-association complex of 1,
afforded racemic products 3 and some byproducts as already men-
tioned. On the other hand, if we can preferentially irradiate the
Table 3
Effect of C. Tem. equivalents on enantioselectivitya
Table 1
Entry
6 (equiv)
Conv.b (%)
Yieldb (%)
eec (%)
Effect of C-3 substituent of an 8-phenylmenthyl derivative on enantioselectivitya
1
2
3
1
3
5
84
83
74
16 (19)d
25 (30)d
40 (54)d
8
10
18
Entry
C. Tem.
eeb (%)
1
2
3
OH (4)
@NOH (5)
NH2 (6)
0
0
18
a
Reaction conditions: toluene, À78 °C, Irradiated for 2 h (>280 nm).
b
Determined by GC analysis (ZB-WAXpuls) using naphthalene as an internal
a
Reaction conditions: toluene, C. Tem. (5 equiv), at À78 °C, irradiated for 2 h
(>280 nm).
standard.
c
Error in ee upon GC analysis (InertCap CHIRAMIX) after methylation: <1%.
b
d
Error in ee upon GC analysis (InetrCap CHIRAMIX) after methylation: <1%.
Yield based on conversion.