C2-H2· · ·O10ii (ii ) 1-x, 1-y, 1-z) and C6-H6· · ·O10iii
(iii ) 1/2+y, 1-x, 1/2+z), with C· · ·O 3.372(2) and
3.398(2) Å, respectively. When the full symmetry of
molecule 2c is applied, a complex network involving a
total of 16 C-H· · ·O hydrogen bonds per molecule arises.
It is noteworthy that these H-bonds involve the two H
atoms ortho to the Cl atom and the carbonyl oxygen atom
O10 as acceptor exclusively. Close stacking of molecules in
the z-direction is achieved by interlocking of the V-shaped
grooves formed by diad-related arylcarboxylate planes.
Figure 6 illustrates the inclusion of two DMF molecules
within a cavity created by two host molecules in the
compound 3a·(DMF)2. Each DMF molecule inserts into the
The parent compound 2a (monoclinic, P21/n) crystallizes
with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit.5
j
These have pseudo-4 symmetries and conformations very
Figure 6. Inclusion of DMF molecules by host 3a.
similar to one another and to that of the chlorinated analogue
2c. However, in its own crystal, 2a displays minimal
C-H· · ·O hydrogen bonding,5 and the enhanced ability of
host 2c to form hydrogen bonds may be related to its
tendency to form gels. The crystal packing of 2a also differs
from that of 2c. In 2a, close packing is achieved by insertion
of a phenyl ring of one molecule within the V-groove of a
neighboring molecule. The result is extensive molecular
overlap when the crystal structure is viewed down the
bowl-like cavity generated by three alternate arylcarboxylate
units, the whole assembly shown having a center of inversion.
Inspection of the crystal packing shows that guest molecules
are fully surrounded by host molecules. Only one weak
host-guest hydrogen bond was detected: C13-H13· · ·O31ii
with C· · ·O 3.353(2) Å (ii ) 2-x, 1-y, 1-z, atom O31 being
that of the DMF molecule).
H-bonding between host molecules is minimal; only one
bond with C· · ·O < 3.4 Å was found, namely C4-H4· · ·O19ii
(ii ) x, 1+y, z) with C· · ·O ) 3.143(2) Å. In contrast to 2c,
where Cl-induced acidity in flanking C-H groups appears
to promote C-H· · ·O hydrogen bonding, the F atoms
surprisingly do not appear to manifest analogous effects in
the crystal of inclusion compound 3a·(DMF)2.
j
common direction of the host pseudo-4 axes (Figure 5).
While the factors favoring organogelation are not fully
understood, self-assembly via noncovalent interactions,
including H-bonding, have been indicated as playing a role.7
For the novel host compounds reported here, the small
sample of crystal structures gives some indications of
H-bonding potential in the solid state. Possible structural
differences in crystals of the gelator 2c and the nongelator
2a that may account for their different behaviors include the
presence of numerous intermolecular C-H· · ·O hydrogen
bonds and close Cl· · ·Cl contacts for the former compound
versus only relatively few C-H· · ·O hydrogen bonds for the
latter. Further X-ray studies and investigation of the nature
of molecular association in the gels are necessary to develop
a possible mechanism for organogelation and to understand
the different behaviors of the two series of host compounds.
Figure 5. Crystal packing in 2a viewed approximately parallel to
the [101] direction.
The novel hexasalicylide host 3a is located on a center of
inversion.6 Aryl carboxylate units are linked by trans ester
linkages (C-C-O-C range -176.1(2) to +176.7(2)°) and
alternate in orientation. Space-filling models show that in
this conformation the central region of the host is blocked
by oxygen atoms of the ester groups with O· · ·O distances
of 2.806(2) and 3.157(2) Å. The molecule therefore presents
two bowl-shaped cavities to potential guest molecules, above
and below the belt of constricting oxygen atoms.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the “High-
Tech Research Center” Project for Private Universities:
mating fund subsidy from MEXT (Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology), 2005-2009.
M.R.C. acknowledges research support from the University
of Cape Town and the NRF (Pretoria).
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedure,
spectroscopic characterization, and CIF files for compounds
2c and 3a·(DMF)2. This material is available free of charge
(6) Crystal data for 3a·(DMF)2: empirical formula C24H16F3NO7, M )
487.38, triclinic, space group P-1 (No. 2), a ) 9.5721(7) Å, b ) 10.0848(7)
Å, c ) 12.5819(6) Å, R ) 69.849(4)°, ꢀ ) 73.108(4)°, γ ) 75.513(4)°, V
) 1075.7(1) Å3, Z ) 2, Dc ) 1.505 g/cm3, F000 ) 500, Mo KR radiation,
λ ) 0.71073 Å, T ) 213(2)K, 2θmax ) 52.8°, 7836 reflections collected,
4386 unique (Rint ) 0.0490). Final GooF ) 1.031, R1 ) 0.0371, wR2 )
0.0885, R indices based on 3333 reflections with I >2σ(I) (refinement on
F2), 319 parameters, 0 restraints. Lp corrections applied, µ ) 0.128 mm-1.
OL8004485
(7) Pal, A.; Ghosh, Y. K.; Bhattacharya, S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7334–
7348.
2122
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 11, 2008