The CPTH content of bait samples was quantified following
the extraction of approximately 2.0 g of bait with 25 mL of
mobile phase in a 50-mL centrifuge tube. The tubes were
capped, aligned horizontally, and mechanically shaken at
high speed for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 2000g
for 2 min. Extractions were repeated two more times with
Soil Testing Laboratory for characterization. Conductivity,
pH, percent organics, cation exchange capacity, texture
analysis, and moisture content were determined for each
sample.
Soil Laboratory Incubation. Untreated soils from three
sites were combined and mixed, and 10-g aliquots were placed
in 60-mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes. The soil was then
fortified with CPTH at 300 ppm. Control soils were not
fortified with CPTH. The uncovered tubes were incubated
in a Revco Model PG-8-1045-A environmental chamber at 25
°C and exposed to a 12:12 h light:dark cycle with an average
relative humidity of 65%. The mouths of the uncapped tubes
were positioned approximately 0.3 m from a bank of
fluorescent and incandescent light bulbs. Approximately 1
mL of deionized water was added to each tube on alternate
days. Soil samples were removed on days 0, 1, 3, 6 and 13,
extracted, and analyzed by HPLC using the same procedure
as was used for the field soil samples.
Mass Spectrom etry. HPLC/ MS was conducted on a
Hewlett Packard (HP) 1090 liquid chromatograph/ 5989 mass
spectrometer equipped with a HP 5990A particle beam
interface and operated in the electron impact (EI) ionization
mode. Mass spectrometry conditions were as follows: helium
nebulizer pressure, 38 psi; ionization potential, 70 eV;
desolvation chamber temperature, 40 °C; source temperature,
250 °C. The mass spectrometer was manually tuned using
perfluorotributylamine and monitoring ions m/z 69, 219, and
502 in EI mode. Analyses were conducted in the full scan
mode (100-300 m/z) and selected ion monitoring mode for
the detection of azo-CPT (m/z 125, 153, 278, 280), acetyl-CPT
(m/z 106, 141, 183, 185), and 3-hydroxy-p-toluidine (m/z 77,
94, 122, 123). Chromatographic separation was conducted
with a 250 cm × 4.6 mm Octyl/ H HPLC column (Keystone
Scientific). A mobile phase of acetonitrile:water (92:8) was
used at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/ min.
1
0 mL of mobile phase; supernatants were combined and
diluted to a final volume of 50.0 mL with mobile phase.
Aliquots were filtered through 0.45 µm nylon filters prior to
analysis by HPLC.
For analyses of soil samples, approximately 10 g of soil
was added to 50-mL centrifuge tubes containing 10.0 mL of
acetonitrile. The tubes were capped, aligned horizontally,
and mechanically shaken at high speed for 15 min. The soil-
containing tubes were then centrifuged at 1000g for 2 min.
Aliquots of the supernatant were removed, filtered through
0
.45 µm filters, transferred to two 2-mL amber autosampler
vials, and capped. CPTH content of the extracts was
determined by HPLC. Recoveries were determined by the
analysis of quality control (QC) samples containing 0.2, 0.5,
and 2.0 µg of CPTH/ g of soil. Soil moisture content was
determined by calculating mass difference following the
drying of 10.00-g aliquots of soil at 110 °C for at least 12 h.
Site Preparation. The rice fields at three different study
sites were prepared identically. Fields were divided into 0.3
m × 0.3 m treatment areas. Each treatment area was at least
1
m from any other treatment area. Two application methods,
aqueous and seed treatment, were evaluated at each site. For
each sampling day, triplicate treatment areas and a control
plot were required for each treatment method. Each study
site required 24 treatment and eight control areas.
Application Methods. All treatment areas were fortified
on the same day by one of two methods. For the rice
application method, 30 grains of 2% CPTH-treated rice bait
2
were placed randomly over each 0.09 m treatment area. The
rice bait on each treatment area contained approximately
GC/ MS was conducted on a HP 5890 gas chromatograph
and 5970 mass selective detector. The GC was equipped with
a 0.25 mm × 15 m DB-5 column (J&W Scientific) and operated
with helium carrier gas at a flow rate of approximately 45
mL/ min at an initial temperature of 50 °C, ramped at 10 °C/
min to 160 °C, held at 160 °C for 0.1 min, ramped at 30 °C/
min to a final temperature of 290 °C, and held at the final
temperature for 2.5 min. Mass spectrometry conditions were
as follows: ionization energy, 70 eV, mass range, m/z ) 70-
400; ion source temperature, 280 °C.
1
3.2 mg of CPTH. This application rate is equal to 10× the
maximum permitted application rate. No bait was applied
to control areas. To ensure that the initial quantity of CPTH
in contact with the soil was known, an aqueous treatment
method was also employed in which 1.00 mL of a 13.2 mg of
CPTH/ mL of water solution was evenly applied with a syringe
over each aqueous treatment area. Control areas received
no CPTH solution. The field application experiments were
completed in the spring of 1994 from March 28 to April 10.
The ambient temperatures ranged from 58 to 82 °F with
predominately clear skies except for the occurrence of rain
on day 12.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. NMR spec-
tra of the synthesized standards of acetyl-CPT and cis- and
trans-azo-CPT were collected on a Bruker-ACE spectrometer,
1
13
Sam ple Collection. Soil samples were collected one day
prior to treatment, several hours after treatment, and 1, 3, 6,
and 13 days post-treatment. On each sampling day, a control
and three treated samples were collected for each application
method; eight samples were collected per sampling day at
each site. Each sample was obtained by collecting the top
300 MHz ( H) and 75 MHz ( C).
Synthesis of Standards. Postulated degradation products
of CPTH were synthesized for use in identification of actual
CPTH degradation products. Acetyl-CPT (N-acetyl-3-chloro-
p-toluidine hydrochloride) (Figure 1) was prepared from the
free base of CPTH. The free base was prepared by differential
pH extraction on 489.2 mg of CPTH. A total of 130 mg of the
free base CPT (0.92 mmol) was taken up in anhydrous diethyl
ether, and 1 mL of acetyl chloride (14.2 mmol) was added
dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred at room tem-
perature for 30 min. The reaction was quenched by the
addition of distilled water, and the ether was evaporated under
vacuo. The white crystals that formed in the aqueous layer
were filtered (86.8 mg, 0.47 mmol, 51% yield). Analysis by
GC/ MS and HPLC indicated a purity of >99%. Mass spectral
3
cm deep layer of soil in the desired treatment or control
area in a plastic bucket. The soil-containing buckets were
covered and mechanically shaken to provide a homogeneous
sample of which a 500-g subsample was removed and placed
in a 500-mL polyethylene jar. The samples were placed
immediately in a freezer, stored for no longer than 4 days,
and shipped frozen overnight to our laboratory in Denver.
Samples were stored at -26 °C until analyzed.
Storage Stability. Soil samples were stored in our
laboratory for 19-33 days prior to analysis. To estimate the
loss of CPTH during this storage period, control soils from
each study site were combined, homogenized, and fortified
at 0, 0.20, 0.50, and 2.00 µg of CPTH/ g and stored at identical
conditions to the actual field samples. CPTH content of the
soils was determined after 0, 8, 15, 26, and 33 days of storage.
Soil Characterization. Representative control soil samples
from each study site were sent to the Colorado State University
1
data agreed with published data (8). Analysis by H NMR
3
(CDCl , 7.24 ppm) yielded the following data: H-2, 7.55 ppm
(s, 1 p); H-5 and H-6, overlapping, 7.12 and 7.23 ppm (d, 8.4
Hz, d, overlapping solvent peak, 2 p); H-7, 2.29 ppm (s, 3 p);
acetyl methyl, 2.14 ppm (s, 3 p).
Azo-CPT (3,3′-chloro-4,4′-methylazobenzene) (Figure 1)
was synthesized by following the procedure for the reduction
of halogenonitroarenes with lithium aluminum hydride by
VOL. 31, NO. 2, 1997 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
9
3 4 7