1234
B. R. Kusche et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 1233–1235
nonactin analog. This complexity does not lend itself to straightfor-
ward drug development.
Mycelia were recovered from each culture and an approximate
wet weight determined; addition of 11 had no effect upon biomass
production. Macrotetrolides present in the extracts were quanti-
fied by reverse-phase HPLC.20 It was determined that nonactin pro-
duction was inhibited by more than 90% in fermentative cultures
containing either 10 mM or 1 mM of 11. Nonactin production
was at the same level as in the control in a culture containing
0.01 mM of 11; a concentration of 0.1 mM of 11 lead to an interme-
diate level of nonactin production. In all cases, no new macrotetro-
lide analogs were evident in either MS or LC–MS analyses of the
extracts. In addition to showing that 11 had little effect on biomass
production, each of the fermentative cultures reliably generated
other secondary metabolites (phenazines) usually co-synthesized
with macrotetrolides when secondary metabolism is initiated in
S. griseus. Furthermore, analysis22 of the extracts demonstrated
that both enantiomers of nonactic acid, the monomer precursor
to nonactin, were generated in each culture irrespective of the con-
centration of 11 added. We have demonstrated, therefore, that
while 11 does not serve as a precursor to new macrotetrolides, it
Fermentative cultures of S. griseus can generate 6–15 g/L of
macrotetrolide mixtures (>90% 1 and 2). When nonactic acid is
added to fermentative cultures of either S. griseus, or genetically al-
tered strains of S. griseus that have been blocked in the early stages
of nonactin biosynthesis, it can be readily and efficiently incorpo-
rated into nonactin.12 These observations strongly suggest that
precursor-directed biosynthesis has the potential to generate
new nonactin analogs.13,14 As we know that a complex structure
such as nonactic acid will serve as a substrate for precursor-direc-
ted biosynthesis, our first task was to set bounds on the system by
discovering the simplest, most straightforward nonactic acid ana-
log that would work. To that end we completed the synthesis of
the substituted furan derivative 11 (Scheme 1) and evaluated it
in precursor-directed biosynthesis experiments.
Alkylation of a furan-derived anion with propylene oxide was
achieved using White’s method affording 8 in 66% yield after distil-
lation.10 The secondary alcohol of 6 was protected as an acetate by
reaction with acetic anhydride in pyridine to give 9 (79%).15 The
furan derivative 10 was obtained by a free radical addition reaction
with ethyl 2-iodopropionate, as described by Baciocchi and Mura-
glia, to give 10 in 11% yield.16,17 Saponification of 10 gave the free
acid 11 (81%).18 Although the synthesis generated a mixture of dia-
stereoisomers, the synthesis was quite short and effective and we
hoped that new analogs would more likely be formed using such a
mixture in a precursor-directed feeding experiment.
To assess the incorporation of compound 11 into new macrote-
trolide analogs, two fermentative cultures of S. griseus ETH A7796
were prepared from a single vegetative culture and grown for
48 h under standard conditions.19 At 48 h after inoculation of the
fermentative culture (50 mL), 56 mg of 11 (56 mg in 0.5 mL of eth-
anol) was added to one culture; a blank sample (0.5 mL ethanol)
was added to the equivalent control culture. The cultures were al-
lowed to grow for an additional 96 h and the macrotetrolide mix-
ture was isolated according to standard protocols.19 Analysis of the
macrotetrolide mixtures by HPLC20 and LC–MS (TOF)21 showed an
unexpected drastic reduction in macrotetrolide production in the
fed culture compared to the control. Unfortunately, no likely non-
actin analogs could be detected in the extract by both LC–MS and
MS analysis of the complex mixture.
We decided to further evaluate the inhibitory effects of 11 on
the production of nonactin to determine if adding less material
might allow for the production of higher levels of nonactin in
which a low incorporation of 11 might then be more evident. To
this end a series of fermentative cultures were evaluated, with a
range of concentrations of 11 ranging from 0.01 mM to 10 mM, to-
gether with a control culture receiving no exogenous compound.
is indeed a reasonably potent (IC50 ꢀ 100
lM) and selective inhib-
itor of nonactin biosynthesis. As nonactic acid production is not
perturbed, the furan derivative 11 is interfering with the assembly
of nonactin from its monomeric precursors, a process that requires
only the products of the nonK and nonJ type II polyketide synthase-
encoding genes and the nonL CoASH-dependent ligase-encoding
gene.23,24 The inhibition shown by 11 is distinguished from that
of our earlier acetylenic analogs which likely block the formation
of the monomer, nonactic acid.25
While we were not successful in the developing new nonactin
analogs through precursor-directed biosynthesis we have set limi-
tations on the nonactic acid analogs that may be used; it is likely
that the tetrahydrofuran ring of nonactic acid will be essential.
We have discovered, however, an inhibitor that likely will be of
use in our quest to determine how the macrocycle of nonactin is
constructed in vivo from monomeric precursors which, in turn, will
allow us to develop improved approaches for the discovery of non-
actin analogs by precursor-directed biosynthesis.
Acknowledgment
Financial support of this work from the NIH (CA77347) is grate-
fully acknowledged.
References and notes
1. Keller-Schierlein, W.; Gerlach, H. Fortschritted. Chem. Org. Naturstoffe 1968, 26,
161.
2. Meyers, E.; Pansy, F. E.; Perlman, D.; Smith, D. A.; Weisenborn, F. L. J. Antibiot.
1965, 18, 128.
3. Borrel, M. N.; Pereira, E.; Fiallo, M.; Garnier-Suillerot, A. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994,
223, 125.
4. Izatt, R. M.; Bradshaw, S. A.; Nielsen, S. A.; Lamb, J. D.; Christensen, J. J.; Sen, D.
Chem. Rev. 1985, 85, 271.
a
OH
OAc
b
O
7
O
O
5. Lipinski, C. A. J. Pharm. Toxicol. Meth. 2000, 44, 239.
8
9
6. Lee, J. Y. K.; Byeang, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 52, 571.
7. Lee, J. Y. K.; Byeang, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3364.
8. Fleming, I. G.; Sunil, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 17, 2733.
9. Fleming, I. G.; Sunil, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 19, 2287.
10. Arco, M. J.; Trammell, M. H.; White, J. D. J. Organic Chem. 1976, 43, 479.
11. Bartlett, P. A. M.; James, D.; Ottow, Eckhard J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5304.
12. Woo, A. J.; Strohl, W. R.; Priestley, N. D. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 43,
1662.
13. Ritacco, F.; Graziani, E.; Summers, M.; Zabriskie, T.; Yu, K.; Bernan, V.; Carter,
G.; Greenstein, M. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 1971.
14. Jacobsen, J.; Hutchinson, C. R.; Cane, D. E.; Khosla, C. Science 1997, 277, 367.
15. 1-(Furan-2-yl)propan-2-yl acetate (9). Acetic anhydride (12.8 mL, 135 mmol) and
thenpyridine (18.4 mL, 225 mmol)were added toasolutionof8 (5.7 g, 45 mmol)
in THF (15 mL). The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for 2 h
after which the reaction was quenched by the addition of water (100 mL). The
resulting mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3Â 100 mL) and the organic
phases were recovered, combined and washed with water (50 mL), aqueous
c
OAc
OAc
d
CO2Et
CO2Et
O
11
O
10
Scheme 1. Synthesis
a furan-based nonactic acid analog 11. Reagents and
conditions: (a) n-BuLi, À78 °C, THF then propylene oxide, 66%; (b) Ac2O, pyridine,
THF, 79%; (c) BEt3, Fe2(SO4)3, ethyl DL-2-iodopropionate, DMSO, 11%; (d) 2.5 M LiOH,
MeOH, THF, 81%.