Finally, the right hand side of the molecule can be built up
first and linked to 4 or a derivative thereof in which the OH has
been converted into a leaving group (halide, sulfonate ester) as
shown in Scheme 3.
Scheme 4 Reagents: a. HSCH2CH2NHAc, NaH, THF, 91%; b.
Me2NH, NaBH4, MeOH, 90%; c. 2 M KOH, reflux, 94%; d. 7, H2O,
55 ◦C, 88%.
Scheme 3 Reagents: a. HSCH2CH2NH2; b. MeNH2; c. 4 or derivative.
We have recently shown that 5-(chloromethyl)furfural (CMF)
12 can be derived in a single step from either sugars, cellulose,
or raw cellulosic biomass in isolated yields between 80–90%,13
and are now in the course of developing new applications and
markets for this renewable platform chemical. For example, the
natural pesticide d-aminolevulinic acid 13 has been derived from
12 in three steps with an overall yield of 68%.14
of CMF 12 as a biomass-derived platform chemical for the
green synthesis of pharmaceuticals and other value-added
products.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the US National Science Foun-
dation, grant CBET 0932391. The authors also acknowledge
the assistance of Nabin Meher and Mikae¨l Le Meur in the early
development of this project.
Looking at the structures of CMF 12 and ranitidine 1, a
functional correspondence can clearly be seen, wherein the
(dimethylamino)methyl group could be envisaged to be intro-
duced by reductive amination of the C O group, and the sulfide
bond formed by taking advantage of the reactive chloromethyl
functionality.
Our approach to 1 is presented in Scheme 4. Here, the
key thioethylamino fragment is introduced in excellent yield
by reaction of 12 with commercial N-acetylcysteamine. Early
attempts to substitute 12 with cysteamine itself or directly with
fragment 10 were found to proceed in low yields. Treatment of 14
with Me2NH and NaBH4 then gives amine 15,15 and hydrolysis
of the acetyl group provides 5. Our synthesis then merges with
the literature at the reaction of 5 with reagent 7,10 which in our
hands proceeded to give 1 in 90% yield.16
Notes and references
1 R. Wright, J. Health Care Market., 1996, 16, 24.
2 J. Bradshaw, Chron. Drug Discovery, 1993, 3, 45.
3 R. G. Glushkov, E. V. Adamskaya, T. I. Vozyakova and A. F. Oleinik,
Khimiko-Farmatsevticheskii Zhurnal, 1990, 24, 53 and references
therein.
4 Z. Han and B. Zhou, Yiyao Gongye, 1986, 17, 515.
5 M. Hohnjec, J. Kuftinec, M. Malnar, M. Skreblin, F. Kajfez, A. Nagl
and N. Blazevic, Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances, 1986, 15,
533.
6 B. J. Price, J. W. Clitherow and J. Bradshaw, US Patent 4128658,
1978.
7 S. Hirai, H. Hirano, H. Arai, Y. Kiba, H. Shibata, Y. Kusayanagi,
M. Yotsuji, K. Hashiba and K. Tanada, US Patent 4643849, 1987.
8 F. Liu, Y. Liu, B. Li, Y. Duan and G. Xu, Huaxue Tongbao, 2003, 66,
w121.
9 K. S. K. Murthy, G. Weeratunga, B. K. Radatus and K. P. S. Sidhu,
US Patent 5750714, 1998.
10 J. M. Khanna, N. Kumar and B. Khera, P. C. Ray, US Patent 5696275,
1997.
11 T. H Brown, M. A Armitage, R. C Blakemore, P. Blurton, G. J.
Durant, C. R Ganellin, R. J. Ife, M. E Parsons, D. A Rawlings and
B. P Slingsby, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 1990, 25, 217; B. Alhede, F. P.
Clausen, Eur. Patent 0219225, 1989.
The strength of the approach described in Scheme 4, apart
from the use of a renewable starting material, is that all the
reaction yields are high (average 91%), culminating in an overall
68% yield of 1. If this result is superimposed on previously
reported yields of 12 from biomass sources,13 the outcome
would be 61, 57, and 54% isolated chemical yields of ranitidine
1 from sucrose, cellulose, and corn stover, respectively. From
a green chemistry perspective, it is also noteworthy that no
chromatography is required at any step in the synthesis. In
terms of formal green metrics, we calculate an atom economy,17
including all stoichiometric reagents (organic and inorganic),
of 56.3% (see ESI†), which is good for a multistep process. We
suggest that this efficient, renewable approach to the synthesis
of ranitidine 1 will not only provide facile, economic access
to this familiar drug, but also stimulate further development
12 F. Moimas, C. Angeli, G. Comisso, P. Zanon and E. Decorte,
Synthesis, 1985, 509.
13 M. Mascal and E. B. Nikitin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 7924;
M. Mascal and E. B. Nikitin, ChemSusChem, 2009, 2, 859.
14 M. Mascal and S. Dutta, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 40.
15 The reductive amination of furfural derivatives has been described:
A. Cukalovic and C. V. Stevens, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 1201; A. J.
Aasena and J. Skramstad, Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem., 1998,
331, 228.
16 The 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of 1 are consistent with reported
values in the literature: T. J. Cholerton, J. H. Hunt, G. Klinkert and
M. Martin-Smith, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1984, 1761.
17 B. M. Trost, Science, 1991, 254, 1471.
3102 | Green Chem., 2011, 13, 3101–3102
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©