10.1002/anie.201814347
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
are shown in Figure 4a. High tumor uptake of 64Cu-ZD4 was
observed as indicated by the arrow, and revealed 64Cu-ZD4 to be
a suitable PET probe for in vivo tumor VEGFR imaging. In
comparison, the tumor uptake of 64Cu-ZD6474 was revealed by
the PET imaging to be much less. For each PET scan, regions of
interest (ROIs) quantification analysis of tumor uptake was
performed to obtain an imaging ROI–derived percentage of the
injected radioactive dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g). From ROI
analysis of decay-corrected PET images, the tumor uptake of
64Cu-ZD4 probe was 6.16 ± 0.30 %ID/g as early as 2 h p.i., and
increased to 7.24 ± 0.23 %ID/g and 7.90 ± 0.39 %ID/g at 6 h and
24 h p.i., respectively. For the parent monomer radiotracer, the
tumor uptake of 64Cu-ZD6474 was only 0.30 ± 0.11 %ID/g at 2 h,
0.66 ± 0.04 %ID/g at 6 h, and 0.46 ± 0.14 %ID/g at 24 h p.i.. The
following histological study confirmed the abundant expression of
VEGFR in the U87 tumor, which accounted for the high uptake of
VEGFR-specific radiotracers. The in vivo PET imaging clearly
showed that the improved binding of hybrid ZD-4 led to a
significantly increased tumor uptake of 64Cu-ZD4, which was 12-
times higher than that of radiolabeled parent monomer 64Cu-
ZD6474 (P < 0.0001). The high tumor uptake and favorable
pharmacological properties, suggests 64Cu-ZD4 a suitable PET
radiopharmaceutical. Promising radionuclide-based therapeutic
products could be produced by incorporation into developed
agents with appropriate radionuclides.
platform that was capable of probing the actual distribution of cell-
surface receptors could greatly facilitate the rational design of
multivalent drugs.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Houston Methodist Research
Institute. Additional support was acquired from the following
sources: DoD BCRP Breakthrough Award (BC141561P1),
George and Angelina Kostas Research Center for Cardiovascular
Nanomedicine award, the Ernest Cockrell Jr. Presidential
Distinguished Endowed Chair, the National Institutes of Health
(U54CA143837, U54CA151668, U54CA210181), Elaine and
Marvy A. Finger Distinguished Endowed Chair, China National
Natural Science Foundation (81773559, 21472191), the Double
First-Class University Project (CPU2018GY03, CPU2018GY24),
and the Project of State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines,
China Pharmaceutical University (SKLNMZZRC201810). We
thank the electron microscopy and small animal imaging core
facility of Houston Methodist Research Institute. Dr. Zhong Xue is
acknowledged for providing algorithm calculation support.
Keywords: atomic force microscopy • ligand design •
multivalency • PET imaging • VEGFR
[1]
a) M. Mammen, S.-K. Choi, M. Whitesides George, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 1998, 37, 2754-2794; b) C. Fasting, C. A. Schalley, M. Weber, O.
Seitz, S. Hecht, B. Koksch, J. Dernedde, C. Graf, E.-W. Knapp, R. Haag,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10472-10498; c) L. Xu, J. S. Josan, J.
Vagner, M. R. Caplan, V. J. Hruby, E. A. Mash, R. M. Lynch, D. L. Morse,
R. J. Gillies, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109, 21295-21300; d) S. Bhatia,
L. C. Camacho, R. Haag, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8654-8666; e)
S. Cecioni, A. Imberty, S. Vidal, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 525-561; f) G. V.
Dubacheva, T. Curk, R. Auzély-Velty, D. Frenkel, R. P. Richter, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2015, 112, 5579; g) M. Honer, L. Gobbi, L. Martarello, R.
A. Comley, Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19, 1936-1944; h) M. Srinivasarao,
C. V. Galliford, P. S. Low, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 203-219; i)
L. Lang, W. Li, N. Guo, Y. Ma, L. Zhu, D. O. Kiesewetter, B. Shen, G.
Niu, X. Chen, Bioconjugate Chem. 2011, 22, 2415-2422.
[2]
[3]
a) J. E. Gestwicki, C. W. Cairo, L. E. Strong, K. A. Oetjen, L. L. Kiessling,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14922-14933; b) L. L. Kiessling, J. E.
Gestwicki, L. E. Strong, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 696-703.
a) V. M. Krishnamurthy, V. Semetey, P. J. Bracher, N. Shen, G. M.
Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1312-1320; b) M.-H. Li, H.
Zong, P. R. Leroueil, S. K. Choi, J. R. Baker, Bioconjugate Chem. 2017,
28, 1649-1657.
Figure 4. Whole-body microPET/CT image of U87 glioblastoma-bearing mice.
(a) Representative PET/CT images of the tumor-bearing mice were displayed
24 h p.i. of 64Cu-ZD6474 and 64Cu-ZD4 radiotracers. Tumor is indicated by a
white arrowhead. (b) Comparison of decay-corrected ROI analysis of 64Cu-
ZD6474 and 64Cu-ZD4 in tumor. Data shown are represented as mean ± SD (n
= 6 per group, P < 0.0001). (c) The imaged U87 glioblastoma xenograft was
histologically studied using haemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) and VEGFR2-
antibody immunohistochemistry (VEGFR2 IHC) staining.
[4]
a) C.-K. Lee, Y.-M. Wang, L.-S. Huang, S. Lin, Micron 2007, 38, 446-
461; b) X. Huang, X. Li, Q. Wang, J. Dai, J. Hou, L. Chen, Biomaterials
2013, 34, 6139-6146; c) D. J. Müller, M. Krieg, D. Alsteens, Y. F. Dufrêne,
Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20, 4-13.
[5]
[6]
N. Almqvist, R. Bhatia, G. Primbs, N. Desai, S. Banerjee, R. Lal, Biophys.
J. 2004, 86, 1753-1762.
a) Y.-s. Kim, F. Li, B. E. O’Neill, Z. Li, Bioconjugate Chem. 2013, 24,
1937-1944; b) F. Li, S. Jiang, Y. Zu, D. Y. Lee, Z. Li, J. Nucl. Med. 2014,
55, 1525-1531.
In summary, we successfully demonstrated an AFM force
measurement platform that was applied to guide the efficient
design of VEGFR-targeting hybrid ZD-4 from drug ZD6474.
Compound ZD-4 exhibited picomolar receptor affinity, increased
tumor uptake and favorable pharmacological properties, which
showed high potential in diagnostic imaging and therapeutic
treatment of VEGFR-related diseases. Our study suggested a
useful strategy to design ligands with dramatic increased binding
affinity from known drug by effectively combining various
multivalent binding mechanisms. And the force measurement
[7]
a) J. Folkman, New England J. Med. 1971, 285, 1182-1186; b) N. Ferrara,
H.-P. Gerber, J. LeCouter, Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 669-676.
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.