Communication
Green Chemistry
The reaction intermediates were characterized by NMR and fructose are the key to promote the reaction. Our work pro-
1
3
13
the no. 2 carbon labelled C (2- C) of fructose was used to vides a convenient way for HMF formation and separation and
assign the chemical shifts of intermediates. The cyclic fructose paves the way for further improvement of HMF productivity via
(β-pyranose, α-furanose, and β-furanose) was first confirmed in the modification of the solvent structure or the design of high-
the initial spectrum (t = 0 min) as shown in Fig. S4.† When the performance heterogeneous catalysts.
reaction proceeded for 30 minutes (Fig. 2b), a new resonance
peak at 152.3 ppm of HMF appeared, while the other new peaks
were attributed to the reaction intermediates and byproducts. Conflicts of interest
31
Based on the proposed reaction mechanism in DMSO, fruc-
tose first isomerized and the isomer appeared at 109 ppm. The
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1
3
2
- C of the first dehydration intermediate IM1 was similar to
that of the isomer and can be assigned to 111.5 ppm. As the
reaction proceeds for 5 hours, the second dehydration inter-
mediate IM2 was obvious as indicated by the 157 ppm peak,
which agrees with the result in DMSO solvent. Besides, the
main intermediates were also verified by H NMR spectroscopy
as shown in Fig. S5 and Table S2†, combined with experimental
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the programs supported by the
Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-JSC037) and the
Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau (2018B10056 and
1
2019B10096).
characterization and DFT calculations. By comparing the NMR
13
spectra of labeled and unlabeled C, it is found that the main
byproducts formed in this system are located around 176 and
Notes and references
9
5–105 ppm. The peak at 176 ppm can be assigned to LA due to
31
the HMF hydrolysis in water after the reaction. The peaks
around 95–105 ppm are the difructose dianhydrides (DFAs) as
indicated in DMSO, which can further form HMF with enough
1 A. A. Rosatella, S. P. Simeonov, R. F. M. Frade and
C. A. M. Afonso, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 754.
2 P. Y. Dapsens, C. Mondelli and J. Pérez-Ramírez, ACS
Catal., 2012, 2, 1487–1499.
19
reaction time (∼16 h at 150 °C).
The intermediates were further determined by electrospray
ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) as shown in Fig. 2c.
Note that the negative ion mode was employed because it is
beneficial for the detection of intermediates. The peak of m/z
3 R. J. van Putten, J. C. van der Waal, E. de Jong,
C. B. Rasrendra, H. J. Heeres and J. G. de Vries, Chem. Rev.,
2013, 113, 1499–1597.
4 B. R. Caes, R. E. Teixeira, K. G. Knapp and R. T. Raines,
ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2015, 3, 2591–2605.
5 C. Xu, E. Paone, D. Rodriguez-Padron, R. Luque and
F. Mauriello, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2020, 49, 4273–4306.
6 T. Gan, Y. Liu, Q. He, H. Zhang, X. He and H. Ji, ACS
Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2020, 8, 8692–8699.
7 Y. Lu, C.-L. Dong, Y.-C. Huang, Y. Zou, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Li,
N. He, J. Shi and S. Wang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59,
19215–19221.
8 J. Wang, W. Xu, J. Ren, X. Liu, G. Lu and Y. Wang, Green
Chem., 2011, 13, 2678.
9 B. R. Caes and R. T. Raines, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4, 353–
356.
at 179 was assigned to the fructose species corresponding to
−
[
Fru − H] , being verified by their fragments. The two dehydra-
tion intermediates were detected at m/z values of 161 and 143,
−
−
corresponding to [Fru − H
2
O − H] and [Fru − 2H O − H] ,
2
respectively. Besides, these reactants and intermediates almost
disappeared at the end of the reaction, in line with their
characteristics.
As demonstrated above, DPhSO presents a similar catalytic
mechanism and activity as compared to DMSO. The biggest
difference between DPhSO and DMSO is their melting and
boiling points. The higher melting point of DPhSO is the key
to facilitating the efficient separation of the DPhSO precipitate
and HMF product. The comparison of these properties for 10 J. Chen, K. Li, L. Chen, R. Liu, X. Huang and D. Ye, Green
DPhSO and DMSO is shown in Table S4.†
Chem., 2014, 16, 2490–2499.
1
1
1 H. Wang, Q. Kong, Y. Wang, T. Deng, C. Chen, X. Hou and
Y. Zhu, ChemCatChem, 2014, 6, 728–732.
2 J. Zhang, X. Yu, F. Zou, Y. Zhong, N. Du and X. Huang, ACS
Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2015, 3, 3338–3345.
Conclusions
In conclusion, a simple synthesis and separation of HMF have 13 Z. Hu, Y. Peng, Y. Gao, Y. Qian, S. Ying, D. Yuan, S. Horike,
been achieved from fructose with DPhSO as both the solvent
and catalyst. Fructose is entirely converted and the HMF yield
N. Ogiwara, R. Babarao, Y. Wang, N. Yan and D. Zhao,
Chem. Mater., 2016, 28, 2659–2667.
is 68.4% at 140 °C. Significantly, HMF can be facilely isolated 14 T. S. Hansen, J. M. Woodley and A. Riisager, Carbohydr.
from DPhSO with water, thus realizing the easy separation and Res., 2009, 344, 2568–2572.
availability for further reaction. Moreover, large-scale HMF 15 A. Ranoux, K. Djanashvili, I. W. C. E. Arends and
production is feasible as DPhSO exhibits excellent reusability U. Hanefeld, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 760–763.
over six times. The investigation of the reaction mechanism 16 Y. Li, H. Liu, C. Song, X. Gu, H. Li, W. Zhu, S. Yin and
showed that hydrogen bond interactions between DPhSO and C. Han, Bioresour. Technol., 2013, 133, 347–353.
3244 | Green Chem., 2021, 23, 3241–3245
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021