182
J.-W. Lee et al. / Carbohydrate Research 346 (2011) 177–182
5. Lewkowski, J. ARKIVOC 2001, 1, (ARKAT-USA; ISSN 1424-6376), 17–54.
6. Román-Leshkov, Y.; Barrett, C. J.; Liu, Z. Y.; Dumesic, J. A. Nature 2007, 447,
982–986.
7. Kunkes, E. L.; Simonetti, D. A.; West, R. M.; Serrano-Ruiz, J. C.; Gärtner, C. A.;
Dumestic, J. A. Science 2008, 322, 417–421.
8. Binder, J. B.; Raines, R. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1979–1985.
9. Li, C.; Zhao, Z. K.; Wang, A.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, T. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345,
1846–1850.
10. Hu, S.; Xhang, Z.; Zhou, T.; Song, J.; Fang, H.; Han, B. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 873–
877.
11. Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Z. K. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1111–1114.
12. Chun, J.-A.; Lee, J.-W.; Yi, Y.-B.; Hong, S.-S.; Chung, C.-H. Korean J. Chem. Eng.
2010, 27, 920–925.
13. Chun, J.-A.; Lee, J.-W.; Yi, Y.-B.; Hong, S.-S.; Chung, C.-H. Starch/Stärke 2010, 62,
326–330.
examined with nine concentrations of acorn biomass from 10% to
50% (w/v) at intervals of 5% to compare their relative productivity.
As shown in Figure 7, the highest productivity was identified with
a value of ca. 1.2-fold greater at 15% concentration of the biomass
than the control one (10%). However, over 20% concentration its
productivity began to decrease and reached down to a value of
ca. 0.4-fold at 50% (Fig. 7). In particular, much lower HMF produc-
ivity values (more than 50% decreases in its value) were observed
between 35% and 50% concentration of the biomass (Fig. 7), imply-
ing that its suitable concentration for the productivity of HMF
would be between 10% and 30%. Based on the above data, it is
thought the biomass concentration could be an important param-
eter in cost-effectively producing HMF from raw acorn biomass.
14. Röper, H. Starch/Stärke 2002, 54, 89–99.
15. Papaiconomou, N.; Yakelis, N.; Salminen, J.; Bergman, R.; Prausnitz, J. M.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Preliminary Report, 2005 (website:
4. Conclusions
16. Muzart, J. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 113–140.
17. Luo, H.-K.; Li, D.-G.; Li, S. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2004, 221, 9–17.
18. Zhao, H.; Holladay, J. E.; Brown, H.; Zhang, Z. C. Science 2007, 316, 1597–1600.
19. Su, Y.; Brown, H. M.; Huang, X.; Zhou, X.-D.; Amonette, J. E.; Zhang, Z. C. Appl.
Catal., A: General 2009, 361, 117–122.
20. Bellon-Maurel, V.; Vallat, C.; Goffinet, D. Appl. Spectrosc. 1995, 49, 556–562.
21. Pistorius, A. M. A.; DeGrip, W. J.; Egorova-Zachernyuk, T. A. Biotechnol. Bioeng.
2008, 103, 123–129.
22. Lin, J.-H.; Lii, C.-Y.; Chang, Y.-H. Carbohydr. Polym. 2005, 59, 507–515.
23. Hineo, M. Carbohydr. Res. 1977, 56, 219–223.
24. Tewari, J.; Irudayaraj, J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 3237–3243.
25. Sekkal, M.; Dincq, V.; Legrand, P.; Huvenne, J. P. J. Mol. Struct. 1995, 349, 349–
352.
We provide a new route to the sustainable production of HMF
using raw acorn biomass obtainable from the oak perennial that
can grow in the wild soils and is a non-food plant. FT-IR spectros-
copy, FESEM, and HPLC analysis confirmed that the major hydroly-
sis products of the biomass were glucose and maltose. The
combined addition of two halide catalysts was more effective for
the synthesis of HMF than their single addition. The highest yield
of HMF occurred in the reaction mixture containing a mix of
CrBr3/CrF3. The best productivity was achieved at 15% concentra-
tion of the biomass, indicating that it would be suitable for the
practical production of HMF from the biomass.
26. Kizil, R.; Irudayaraj, J.; Seetharaman, K. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3912–
3918.
27. Capron, I.; Robert, P.; Colonna, P.; Brogly, M.; Planchot, V. Carbohydr. Polym.
2007, 68, 249–259.
28. Petibois, C.; Rigalleau, V.; Melin, A.-M.; Perromat, A.; Cazorla, G.; Gin, H.;
Déléris, G. Clin. Chem. 1999, 45, 1530–1535.
Acknowledgments
29. Atichokudomchai, N.; Shobsngob, S.; Varavinit, S. Starch/Stärke 2000, 52, 283–
289.
30. Singh, V.; Ali, S. Z. Carbohydr. Polym. 2000, 41, 191–195.
31. Sievers, C.; Musin, I.; Marzialetti, T.; Olarte, M. B. V.; Agrawal, P. K.; Jones, C. W.
ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 665–671.
32. Kautz, C. F.; Robinson, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1928, 50, 1022–1030.
33. van Dam, H. E.; Kieboom, A. P. G.; van Bekkum, H. Starch/Stärke 1986, 38, 95–
101.
34. Kuster, B. F. M.; Temmink, H. M. G. Carbohydr. Res. 1977, 54, 185–191.
35. Kuster, B. F. M. Starch/Stärke 1990, 42, S314–321.
36. Hayes, D. J.; Fitzpatrick, S.; Hayes, M. H. B.; Ross, J. In Biorefineries—Industrial
Processes and Product; Kamm, B., Gruber, P. R., Kamm, M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2006; pp 139–164.
This research was supported by a fund from Dong-A University.
The authors greatly acknowledge the financial support.
References
1. Black, M.; Miller, R. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81, 1725–1728.
2. Ragauskas, A. J.; Williams, C. K.; Davison, B. H.; Britovsek, G.; Cainey, J.; Eckert,
C. A.; Federick, W. J., Jr.; Hallet, J. P.; Leak, D. J.; Liotta, C. L.; Mielenz, J. R.;
Murphy, R.; Templer, R.; Tschaplinski, T. Science 2006, 311, 484–489.
3. Corma, A.; Iborra, S.; Velty, A. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2411–2502.
4. Christensen, C. H.; Rass-Hansen, J.; Marsden, C. C.; Taarning, E.; Egeblad, K.
ChemSusChem 2008, 1, 283–289.
37. Mønsted, L.; Mønsted, O. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1950–1954.