3
4
F.S.H. Simanjuntak et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 484 (2014) 33–38
Scheme 1. Synthesis of glycerol carbonate (GLC) from glycerol and dimethyl carbonate (DMC).
CH3
OCCH2
Mg precursor weight ratio of 10/1, 5/1, 1/1, 0.5/1, and 0.2/1, respec-
tively.
H
OCH CH2
OCH CH2
OH
2
2
x
y
x
2.2. Transesterification of DMC with glycerol
x = 106, y = 70
Fig. 1. Structure of surfactant, Pluronic F127.
In typical reaction condition, glycerol (21.7 mmol, 2.0 g), DMC
43.4 mmol, 3.9 g) and magnesium oxide (0.1 g) were added to the
00 mL round-bottomed flask having reflux condenser. The mix-
(
1
ture was heated with stirring at a desired temperature using bath
oil. After the reaction, the catalyst was separated from the reaction
mixture using syringe filter. The product was analyzed using HPLC
carbonate (DMC) with glycerol is preferable in terms of mild reac-
tion conditions and high glycerol carbonate yield (Scheme 1).
In the synthesis of glycerol carbonate from glycerol and DMC,
a heterogeneous catalyst is preferred due to the high boiling tem-
perature of glycerol and glycerol carbonate. Accordingly, various
heterogeneous base catalysts including MgO, Mg Al hydrotalcite,
Mg La mixed oxide, and Mg/Al/Zr have been studied [28–30].
Among them, as shown in Table S1, commercial MgO was found
to have very poor catalytic activity compared to other Mg-based
mixed oxide catalysts.
(Waters) equipped with an Aminex HPX-87H column (Biorad) and
a RI detector (Waters 410). The mobile phase used was a 5 mM
H SO aqueous solution and the flow rate was set at 0.6 mL/min.
2
4
2.3. Instrument
Structural characterizations of all samples were conducted
As a way to increase the catalytic activity of MgO, we synthesized
MgO using a surfactant, pluronic F127 (Fig. 1), a triblock copolymer
of ethylene oxide/propylene oxide/ethylene oxide. The morphol-
ogy, surface area, and catalytic activity were compared with those
of other MgO catalysts synthesized without using a surfactant. To
elucidate the high catalytic activity of MgO prepared using the sur-
factant, the catalysts were analyzed using XRD, BET, and UV–vis.
The basic site concentration of the catalyst was determined by the
using by X-Ray diffraction (Shimadzu XRD-6000, Japan). The
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area was determined using
a Belsorp-mini II apparatus (BEL Inc., Osaka, Japan). Basic site con-
centration on the surface of catalyst was measured by benzoic acid
titration method using Hammett indicators and TPD of CO . The
2
titration was conducted three times and the average value was
used in this report. The TPD experiment conducted using Belcat-B
(Belcat, Osaka, Japan) equipped with a thermal conductivity detec-
titration method and CO –TPD.
2
tor (TCD). All samples were pretreated in situ in a He flow of
◦
3
0 mL/min at 300 C and exposed to a flowing mixture 3% of CO in
2
◦
He for 10 min at 30 C. Then, purged with He to remove physically
2
. Experimental procedure
◦
◦
adsorbed CO2 and heated to 700 C with heating rate 10 C/min.
The UV–DRS (diffuse reflectance spectra) was obtained using a
UV–vis–NIR infrared spectrophotometer (Cary 5000, Varian, USA).
The particle shape image was measured using SEM (FEI Inc., Nova-
Nano 200, Hillsboro).
2.1. Catalyst preparation
All reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used as
received without further purifications.
In this study, three kinds of magnesium oxide were synthesized:
direct calcinations of Mg(NO ) ·6H O (MgO–C), precipitation
3. Results and discussion
3
2
2
of Mg(NO ) ·6H O using KOH (MgO–P) and calcination of
3
2
2
Mg(NO ) ·6H O—surfactant mixture (MgO–S).
3.1. Effects of preparation method
3
2
2
In direct calcinations method, Mg(NO ) ·6H O was calcined at
3
2
2
◦
6
80 C in air atmosphere for 4 h.
In precipitation method, KOH (0.1 mol) in 50 g of distilled water
Three kinds of magnesium oxides were prepared by cal-
cining a magnesium precursor. MgO–C was obtained from the
direct calcination of Mg(NO ) ·6H O, while MgO–P was synthe-
was dropwised into the solution of Mg(NO ) ·6H O (6.6 g in 50 g
3
2
2
3
2
2
of water) until the pH reached 10 and stirred for 24 h at room tem-
perature. Formed white solid was filtered and washed with water,
sized by calcining the precipitated magnesium precursor from
Mg(NO ) ·6H O in a KOH solution. The third sample, MgO–S(5),
3
2
2
◦
◦
dried at 100 C for 12 h, and subsequently calcined at 680 C for 4 h.
In surfactant method, 12.8 g of triblock polymer, poly(ethylene
oxide)-b-poly(propylene oxide)-b-poly(ethylene oxide), Pluronic
F127 (EO106PO70EO106) in 25 g of ethanol was stirred with
Mg(NO ) ·6H O (2.56 g) and HNO (0.49 g, 70 wt%). The mixture
was obtained by calcining a magnesium precursor that was
obtained from a mixture of Mg(NO ) ·6H O and the surfactant
3
2
2
Pluronic F127 (EO1 PO EO ) with a weight ratio of surfac-
06
70
106
tant/Mg precursor of 5.
The XRD patterns of the catalysts, shown in Fig. 2, revealed that
all samples had a clear MgO crystalline phase. The crystallite size
of MgO particles obtained from the Scherrer equation using the
(2 0 0) peak was estimated to be 25.3, 10.7, and 14.0 nm for MgO–C,
MgO–P, and MgO–S(5), respectively.
3
2
2
3
◦
was stirred for 1 day at room temperature, then dried at 130 C
for 1 day. The solid was collected and calcined at 680 C for 4 h in
◦
air. MgO catalyst were marked as MgO–S(10), MgO–S(5), MgO–S(1),
MgO–S(0.5), and MgO–S(0.2) for samples prepared with surfactant/