2
the original O contained in the reactor, including the
-
6
headspace, i.e., 2.6 × 10 mol.
The predicted net 1:1 stoichiometric ratio of carbonyl
production (R3) compared to CF production (R4) was
confirmed by switching to ethanol, which yields acetaldehyde
that can more easily be detected against the high background
concentration of acetone (instead of 2-propanol which yields
acetone). The acetaldehyde concentration was found to
increase from zero to 1.2 mM as CF increased to 1.4 mM
under our standard conditions.
Other chlorocarbons besides CT can also be dehaloge-
nated via this process. Relative rates of dehalogenation for
a series of chlorinated methanes and ethanes, obtained under
identical conditions in sunlight, are summarized in Table 1.
The substituted methanes were apparently dehalogenated
at a rate that was inversely related to the C-Cl bond energy
(
CT > CF). Among the ethanes, reduction occurred more
readily at the most heavily substituted carbon atom. For
example, 1,1,1,2-TECA is reduced 30 times faster than 1,1,2,2-
TECA, while 1,1,1-TCA reduction was 70 times faster than
FIGURE 5. Zero-order reaction rates for both carbon tetrachloride
loss and chloroform production increase linearly with 2-propanol
14
-1
concentration (75 W Xe lamp, I
A
) 6.6 × 10 photon s ; [A] )
1
,1,2-TCA. Although PCE and TCE were degraded, no reaction
0
.69 M; [CT] ) 3 mM; optical depth ) 2.2 M cm; anoxic). Linear
0
-
products other than Cl could be identified. The expected
hydrogenolysis products, TCE and DCE, respectively, were
not observed.
-
2
regression parameters for CT loss rate: slope ) (2.3 ( 0.1) × 10 ;
-
2
2
intercept ) (1.7 ( 0.7) × 10 ; r ) 0.997; n ) 12.
Combinations of other carbonyls, including methyl ethyl
ketone, 2-pentanone, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, biacetyl, ben-
zophenone, acetophenone, methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol,
and 1-butanol, are also effective and are currently under
investigation.
apparently first-order in CT (Figure 1). This suggests the
existence of two different rate-limiting steps, depending on
[CT]. We consider each phase in turn. During the zero-order
period, when [CT] is still high and the propagation steps R3
and R4, in particular, are fast, the overall loss of CT is limited
by an earlier step in the mechanism. This is postulated to be
R2 because of the observed first-order dependence on [iP]
under these conditions (Figure 5). The slope of this plot is
Acknowledgments
This publication was made possible by grant number P42
ES004940 from the National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, NIH with funding provided by EPA. We thank
Brian Barbaris and Kristen Taylor for their assistance in the
laboratory and Jennifer Slack and Cynthia Malbrough for
help in preparing the manuscript.
2
therefore equal to k A*. Since water and ground-state acetone
are both poor H-donors (1), initiation reactions equivalent
to R2 do not occur in the absence of iP, and the intercept is
within 2-3 SDs of zero. No further kinetic information
concerning subsequent steps in the proposed reaction
mechanism can be extracted from the kinetic data during
the zero-order period since R2 is the rate-limiting step.
If we next focus on the second phase (last 10% of the
reaction), when [CT] is low due to reduction to CF, the
reaction becomes first-order in [CT]. Here it is postulated
that a later step in the proposed mechanism, i.e., R4, becomes
Literature Cited
(1) Scaiano, J. C. J. Photochem. 1973/74, 2, 81-118.
(2) Cowan, D. O.; Drisko, R. L. Elements of Organic Chemistry;
Plenum Press: New York, 1976.
(
3) Churio, M. S.; Greal, M. A. J. Chem. Educ. 1997, 74, 436-438.
rate-limiting. This is reasonable since k is 3-5 orders of
4
magnitude smaller than the other second-order rate con-
stants. During this first-order CT period a kinetic analysis
becomes more useful. The rate law can be written as
(4) Coxon, J. M.; Halton, B. Organic Photochemistry, 2nd ed.;
Cambridge University Press: London, 1987.
(
5) Rubin, M. B. CRC Handbook of Organic Photochemistry and
Photobiology; Harspool, W. M.; Song, P.-S., Eds.; CRC Press:
Boca Raton, 1995; pp 430-436.
•
ν ) -d[CT]/ dt ) d[CF]/ dt ) k [CT][iP ]
(7)
(6) Calvert, J. G.; Pitts, J. N., Jr. Photochemistry; Wiley: New York,
966.
3
1
(
7) Wagner, P.; Park, B.-S. Organic Photochemistry; Padwa, A., Ed.;
Marcel Dekker: New York, 1991; Vol. 2, pp 227-366.
8) Golub, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 2615-2619.
9) Golub, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 4925-4926.
Under conditions of steady illumination, making pseudo-
steady-state assumptions for [A*], [iP ], and [CT ] results in
the following rate law.
•
•
(
(
(
(
(
10) Schumb, W. C. Hydrogen Peroxide; Reinhold: New York, 1955;
pp 548-549.
11) Seinfeld, J. H. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution;
1
/ 2
ν ) k (2I / k ) [CT]
(8)
3
A
5
Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1986.
Thus, under pseudo-steady-state conditions, the reaction
becomes first-order in [CT], as observed (Figure 1).
A 120-min time lag was observed before CT reduction
12) Rabek, J. F. Experimental Methods in Photochemistry and
Photophysics; Wiley-Interscience: Chichester, 1982; Part 2, p
9
44.
began when the reactor was purged with air instead of He.
(
(
13) Wardman, P. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1989, 18, 1637-1755.
14) Blank, B.; Henne, A., Laroff, G. P.; Fischer, H. Pure Appl. Chem.
•
This arises because O
). After the O
of CT proceeded, but at a higher rate than expected based
on the results of O -free experiments. A rate increase could
occur if the O reaction produced more carbonyl chromo-
phore. Hydrogen peroxide should be produced stoichio-
metrically from the dissolved O . The observed H of
3.5 × 10 mol was reasonably close to that estimated for
2
is a better iP scavenger than CT (1-
4
2
was consumed by iP oxidation, the degradation
1
975, 41, 475-494.
(
(
15) Porter, G.; Dogra, R. O.; Loutfy, S. E.; Sagumori, S. E.; Yip, R. W.
Faraday Trans. 1973, 69, 1462-1474.
16) Turro, N. J. Modern Molecular Photochemistry; Benjamin
2
2
Cummings: 1978; p 91.
2
2
O
2
(17) Alfassi, Z. B. Chemical Kinetics of Small Organic Radicals; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, 1988; Vol. 3, pp 41-69.
-
6
≈
1
2 3 2
9
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 34, NO. 7, 2000