W. Bidell et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 562 (1998) 115–122
119
Table 1
Analytical and spectroscopic dataa
Compound
Spectroscopic data
3
C 92.2 (92.5), H: 1.0 (1.0). MS (FAB, NOBA
1Hb 4.68 (s, br, CH2); 7.46, 8.16 (m, arom. H, AA%BB%); 13.42 (s, OH).
matrix, toluene): expected [M+ ion not found,
(CS2+C6D5CD3, −38°C): 4.02 (d, 2J=14.5, CH2); 4.98 (d, 2J=14.5, CH2); 7.43, 8.11
(m, arom. H, AA%BB%); 13.48 (s, OH). 13Cc: 37 (s, CH2); 65 (s, sp3 carbons C60);
110–155 (s, 16 C60 and 6 arene side chain signals); 186 (s, CO). IRa: 3450 (vw, w(OH)),
1622 (m, w(CꢀO)), 1585 (m), 1417 (s), 1339 (s), 1266 (s), 1183 (w), 810 (w), 775 (m), 732
(m), 723 (m), 578 (vw), 528 (s). UV–vis (CH2Cl2, nm): 229, 257, 328, 407, 437 (sh),
473, 489, 523 (sh).
only [C60]
+. m.p.:\310°C (dec.)
4
C 91.8 (92.3), H 1.6 (1.4), m.p.:\300°C (dec.). MS 1Hb: 4.33 (s, OCH3); 4.61, 5.43 (s, br, CH2); 8.08–8.10, 8.48–8.52 (m, arom. H,
(FAB, NOBA matrix, toluene): 1014 (4.5%,
AA%BB%). (C6D5CD3, −15°C): 4.00 (s, OCH3); 3.91 (d, 2J=14.2, CH2); 4.93 (d,
2J=14.2, CH2); 7.09–7.11, 8.16–8.19 (m, arom. H, AA%BB%). (C6D5CD3, 92°C): 3.99
(s, OCH3); 4.52 (s, br, CH2); 7.21–7.24, 8.12–8.15 (m, arom. H, AA%BB%). 13Cd: 39 (s,
CH2); 63 (s, OCH3); 66 (s, sp3 carbons C60); 110–160 (s, 20 peaks for C60 and arene
side chain signals); 183 (s, CO). IRa: 1672 (vs, w(CꢀO)), 1594 (m), 1567 (m),1317 (s),
1313 (s), 1255 (vs), 1083 (m), 1115 (w), 1061 (w), 1040 (m), 988 (m), 970 (vw), 952
(w), 800 (vw), 768 (w), 744 (m), 724 (m), 578 (m), 528 (vs). UV–vis (CH2Cl2, nm):
232, 255, 328, 431.
[M]+); 720 (58%, [C60
[M-C60H2]+).
]
+); 292 (100%,
7
C 80.6 (78.4), H 2.6 (3.3), Na 2.3 (3.1) MS (FAB, 1He: 3.64 (s, OCH2); 4.88, 5.20 (s, br, CH2); 7.62, 8.39 (m, arom. H, AA%BB%). IRa:
NOBA matrix, THF): expected [M]+ ion not
found, only 986 [M-2(Na-15C5)]+ and 721
1628 (vw), 1602 (w), 1580 (s), 1351 (s), 1299 (s), 1247 (m), 1119 (s), 950 (m), 860 (vw),
769 (w), 738 (m), 676 (vw), 578 (vw), 528 (s). UV–vis (THF, nm): 257, 288 (sh), 327,
404, 435, 489, 525, 573, 616.
[C60H]+
.
8
C 80.6 (80.3), H 2.6 (2.6), Cl 2.0 (2.1), N 0.7 (0.8) 1Hf: 3.98 (s, OCH3); 3.54, 4.92 (s, br, CH2); 7.12 (m, P(C6H5)3); 7.63–7.82, 8.11–8.18
(m, arom. H, AA%BB%). 31P-NMR (81 MHz, toluene-D8, 25°C): 25.0 (s, br) IRa: 1785
(m, w(NO)), 1756 (w, sh), 1672 (s, w(CꢀO)), 1593 (w), 1568 (w), 1316 (s), 1255 (s), 1186
(vw), 1159 (vw), 1093 (w) 1040 (w), 988 (w), 970 (vw), 952 (vw), 768 (vw), 7.42 (s),
723 (s), 693 (m), 579 (vw), 527 (s), 521 (s).
a Analytical data given as found (calc.)%. NMR data given as: chemical shift (ppm) [multiplicity (J in Hz), assignment]. Infrared data, in Nujol
mull, cm−1
.
b 300 MHz, CS2+C6D5CD3, 25°C.
c 75.4 MHz, CS2 (D2O, external), 25°C.
d 125 MHz, CS2+CD2Cl2, 25°C.
e In THF-d8, 50°C.
f 250 MHz, toluene-D8, 25°C.
The broad singlet for the methylene protons Ha, He
suggested a low conformational inversion barrier on the
1H-NMR time scale (Fig. 3). Indeed, variable tempera-
ture experiments showed the two signals for Ha and He
coalesced at ca. 6°C and on cooling to −40°C resolved
into two doublets at 4.98 and 4.02 ppm with a geminal
coupling constant of 14.5 Hz (Fig. 3). At r.t., the
different fine structure for the adducts.
Cyclic voltammetry investigations were undertaken
on 3 and 4 as well as the related analogues 5 and 6
shown in Scheme 2. The experiments were conducted in
dichloromethane solvent containing 0.1 M tetrabuty-
lammonium perchlorate as the supporting electrolyte
using platinum electrodes in the form of either mi-
crodisc electrodes (of radius ca. 30 mm) or flag elec-
trodes of traditional dimensions (3 mm).
Dihydroxy-anthraquinone-C60 3 was found to show
two separate one electron oxidations at potentials of
+0.49 and +0.82 V (vs SCE), respectively. However,
the related analogue 5 showed a single two electron
oxidation wave with a halfwave potential of +1.51 V
(vs SCE). This may be attributed to the reaction shown
in Scheme 2. The cyclic voltammetry studies confirmed
the production of H+. Tafel analysis showed the oxida-
tion to be electrochemically irreversible (Tafel slope 120
mV per decade). The contrast in the oxidation be-
haviour with 3 is intriguing. The significant decrease in
1H-NMR spectrum of dimethoxy-anthraquinone-C60
4
showed two separate peaks for the methylene protons
(Ha, He) at 4.93 and 3.91 ppm which resolved on
cooling to −15°C into two doublets with a geminal
coupling constant of 14.2 Hz. On heating the NMR
sample, the coalesce temperature occurred at ca. 50°C
and on heating to 90°C, the methylene protons showed
a broad singlet at 4.52 ppm.
The UV–vis spectra (CH2Cl2) of dihydroxy-an-
thraquinone-C60 3 and dimethoxy-anthraquinone-C60
4
all exhibit typical peaks assignable to the fullerene
moiety at ca. 220, 255 and 330 nm. In addition, there is
a broad absorption at 450–600 nm which exhibits