8160
K. Makino et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 8159–8162
selective tandem Michael-aldol reaction using chiral
glycine esters as a key step.
the desired isomer in a ratio of 91:8:1:0 and in 71% yield
(entry 4). The N-aromatic group in the N-sulfonamide
proved to serve face-selectively in the intramolecular
aldol condensation. Using the optimized conditions, we
carried out synthesis of natural (2S,3R)-3-hydroxy-3-
methylproline in a laboratory scale (20 mmol) as shown
in Scheme 2. Thus, N-1-naphthylsulfonyl-glycine (6) was
esterified with (R)-binaphthol by the acid chloride meth-
od in two steps and the thus-obtained chiral ester was
subjected to the tandem Michael-aldol reaction under
the conditions described above to afford (2S,3R,aR)-3-
hydroxy-3-methylproline ester 3d as a major product
in 77% yield and the same diastereomeric ratio. The
product (2S,3R,aR)-3d without purification was hydro-
lyzed with a mixture of concentrated hydrochloric
acid–acetic acid–water (1.2:2.8:1) at 95 °C for 24 h. Puri-
fication of the crude product using ion-exchange resin
furnished the (2S,3R)-3-hydroxy-3-methylproline with
concomitant diastereomers. Pure 1 was obtained after
conversion to the toluenesulfonic acid salt by crystalliza-
Our synthetic plan is illustrated in Scheme 1, in which
we envisaged that asymmetric synthesis using the chiral
auxiliary in the ester function might be a practical solu-
tion for a large-scale synthesis of (2S,3R)-3-hydroxy-3-
methylproline. Thus, we chose binaphthol as a chiral
7
auxiliary. Binaphthyl monoester 2a of N-tosylglycine
was prepared by careful treatment of N-tosylglycyl chlo-
ride with (S)-binaphthol in the presence of pyridine at
8
0
°C. The diastereoselective tandem Michael-aldol reac-
tion of 2a was extensively investigated and is summa-
rized in Table 1. The reaction in the presence of
diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undecane (DBU) as a base in tetrahy-
drofuran stereorandomly proceeded to give four dia-
stereomers (entry 1). So we examined additive effects.
Addition of 1equiv of lithium chloride (LiCl), however,
impressively improved the diastereomeric ratio to
9
7
7:20:3:0 (entry 2). The stereostructure of the major
1
1
isomer 3a was unambiguously determined to be unnatu-
tion from 2-propanol in 68% yield. The overall yield of
(2S,3R)-3-hydroxy-3-methylproline (1) as the toluene-
sulfonic acid salts from 6 was 39%.
1
0
ral 2R,3S after conversion to the prolinol derivative 5
with lithium aluminum hydride by comparison with the
2
e
authentic sample. With this encouraging result in
hand, we surveyed further additive effects of several
metal salts. Most of the examined salts resulted in no reac-
ion or had no positive effect for the diastereoselectivity.
Calcium chloride was found to also affect the diastereo-
selectivity but to have no effect on the chemical yield
For elucidation of the reaction mechanism, we first
examined whether the reaction proceeds under kinetic
or thermodynamic control. Thus, a 98:2 mixture of
(2R,3S,aS)-3a and (2S,3R,aS)-4a was treated with
DBU (0.2 equiv) and lithium chloride (1equiv) at
ꢀ15 °C for 65 h and the recovered material showed no
change in the diastereomeric ratio. Therefore, the
reaction proved to be kinetic. From the experiments de-
scribed above it is apparent that the diastereoselectivity
is attributed to the presence of lithium chloride and the
N-protecting group. Although the origin of this interest-
ing lithium chloride-induced diastereoselectivity is not
clear at present, lithium chloride seems to play an
(
entry 5). From the view point of chemical yield we
chose lithium chloride as the additive and next examined
effects of the N-protecting group in the glycine deriva-
tive as shown in Table 2. The reaction was conducted
in the presence of DBU (0.2 equiv) and lithium chloride
(
1equiv) at ꢀ15 °C for 65 h. The N-1-naphthylsulfonyl-
glycine (S)-binaphthyl ester (2d) was the most efficient in
terms of diastereoselectivity and chemical yield to afford
a
Table 1.
OH
OH
anti
DBU (0.2 eq)
O
additive (1.0 eq)
HO
+
HO
O
+
+
OR*
OR*
diastereomers
N
N
O
THF
conditions
R* =
Ts
Ts
TsHN
O
O
O
(2S,3R,aS)-4a
(
2R,3S,aS)-3a
(
S)-2a
syn
syn
OH
OH
Ts
2S,3S)-5
N
(
Entry
Additive
Temperature (°C)
Time (d)
Yield (%)
18
3a:4a
syn
23:30
77:20
29:42
27:44
89:9
anti
1
2
3
4
5
––
ꢀ71 to rt
ꢀ71to rt
ꢀ15
1
1
>2
>2
>2
30:17
3:0
21:8
22:7
2:0
LiCl
NaCl
KCl
44
4
6
6
ꢀ15
CaCl
2
ꢀ15
a
2 2 3 3 2 4 4
Addition of other metal salts such as MgCl , ZnCl , FeCl , LaCl Æ7H O, TiCl , and Ti(O-iPr) gave no Michael-aldol adduct.